Abstract
This paper considers distance learning at all levels, learning that can occur anywhere. Most education today in schools, universities, and companies is dependent on students being at a particular location, such as a university. The major distance learning institutions today are in Europe, but the potential for this type of learning is great as we reach out to serve greater numbers of students. The following factors are critical in forming a distance learning institute today: the quality of learning provided to each student; whether courses work for very large numbers of students; and the cost per student hour, for both development and delivery. Many delivery technologies are possible today. We examine them from the standpoint of these factors. The conclusion is that highly interactive multimedia learning units, either CD ROMs or (in the near future) broadband networks, provide the best delivery system today for distance learning. The paper concludes with a brief review of strategies for developing the curriculum units needed to support distance learning.
References
Anon. (1991). Distance learning methodology and information resources management.International Journal of Information Resource Management 2(1).
Anon. (1993).The Electronic University: A Guide to Distance Learning, Peterson's Guides in cooperation with National University Continuing Education Assoc. (NUCEA), Princeton, New Jersey.
Bates, A. W. (Ed.) (1990).Media and Technology in European Distance Education: Proceedings of the EADTU Workshop on Media, Methods and Technology, EADTU, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Bork, A. (1987). Interaction: Lessons from computer-based learning. In Laurillard, D. (Ed.),Interactive Media: Working Methods and Practical Applications, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chincester, U.K..
Bork, A., Ibrahim, B., et al. (1992). The Irvine-Geneva course development system. In Aiken, R. (Ed.),Education and Society, Information Processing 92, Vol. II. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Burge, E., and Roberts, J.Classrooms with a Difference: A Practical Guide to the Use of Conferencing Technologies, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Claxton, C. and Murrell, P. (1987).Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practices, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4.
Jones, G. (1991).Make All America a School Mind Extension University, Jones 21st Century, Englewood, Colorado.
Jones, A., Scanlon, E., and O'Shea, T. (Eds.) (1987).The Computer Revolution in Education: New Technologies for Distance Teaching, St. Martins Press, New York.
Kozma, R. J. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research 61: 179–211.
Laurillard, D. (1993).Rethinking University Teaching, Routledge, London.
Perraton, H. (Ed.) (1993).Distance Education for Teacher Training, Routledge, New York.
Smith, P., andKelly, M. (Eds.) (1987).Distance Education and the Mainstream: Convergence in Education, Croom Helm, New York.
The Johnson Foundation (1993). An American Imperative: Higher Expectations in Higher Education. Report of the Wingspread Group on Higher Education.
Walter, P. (1977).The Open University, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bork, A. Distance learning and interaction: Toward a virtual learning institution. J Sci Educ Technol 4, 227–244 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211838
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211838