Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 151–167 | Cite as

Preface to a practical theology of aging

  • Don S. Browning
Articles

Abstract

To address theologically the issue of aging is to confront the problems of practical theology. The problems of aging give us an opportunity to begin afresh our reflections upon the nature of practical theology. A practical theology of aging must take experience seriously. It must use phenomenological description and empirical analysis to open up the surface and the depth dimensions of experience. But then the results of these labors must be correlated with a hermeneutics of Christian symbols. When the results of these endeavors are pooled, the key to meaningful aging emerges as learning to “care” for oneself, one's future, and the future of the race.

Keywords

Empirical Analysis Cross Cultural Psychology Phenomenological Description Depth Dimension Practical Theology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Maurice Merleau-Ponty,The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964), pp. 64–78.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., p. 67.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paul Ricoeur,Freedom and Nature (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966), p. 87.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., p. 88.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The method of correlation I have in mind here should not be confused with Tillich's method of correlating answers from revelation with questions from existence. Although the method I am discussing includes that method, it goes beyond this. It is closer to the method of correlation described throughout the works of Seward Hiltner, Daniel Day Williams, and, most recently, David Tracy. See Chapter 6 of myAtonement and Psychotherapy (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1966), pp. 149–72; and David Tracy, “The Task of Fundamental Theology,”Journal of Religion 54, no. 1 (January 1974):18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    For an important discussion of how theoretically true statements are not always directly relevant for creative adaptation, see Heinz Hartmann,Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation (New York: International Universities Press, 1958), p. 19.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See Simone de Beauvoir's summary of the physiology of aging,The Coming of Age (New York: Warner Publications, 1973), pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    This emphasis upon the mediated nature of the experience of aging and eventual death is compatible with the point of view developed by Paul Ricoeur inFreedom and Nature, pp. 432–33 and 456–63.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    My analysis of denial and consent is closely parallel to Ricoeur's description of refusal and consent,Freedom and Nature, pp. 463–80.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernice Neugarten and Nancy Datn, “Sociological Perspectives on the Life Cycle,” inLife-Span Developmental Psychology, ed. Paul Baltes and Warner Schaire (New York: Academic Press, 1973), pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Discussions of these last stages of life appear in several different places in Erik H. Erikson's writings, notably inChildhood and Society, 2nd ed. (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1963), pp. 247–74;Identity and the Life Cycle (New York: International Universities Press, 1959), pp. 50–100; andYouth: Identity and Crisis (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1968), pp. 91–141.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erikson,Childhood and Society, p. 65.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erikson,Youth: Identity and Crisis, p. 92.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ibid., p. 138.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erikson,Childhood and Society, p. 267; andYouth: Identity and Crisis, p. 138.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erik H. Erikson,Insight and Responsibility (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1964), p. 130.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Erikson,Youth: Identity and Crisis, p. 138 (italics mine).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erikson,Insight and Responsibility, p. 130.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Erikson,Youth: Identity and Crisis, p. 140.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Recent work on the theory of instinct advances the idea that there is no way arbitrarily to separate instinct from learning. See William Barrett and Daniel Yankelovich,Ego and Instinct (New York: Random House, 1970), pp. 347–82 and 441–46. Therefore, these authors assume that all instinctive tendencies, especially in man, need an “average expectable environment” or a “continuum of experience” to activate and stabilize these tendencies. Furthermore, they argue that man's ethical tendencies—even his altruistic care for his own children and for the wider human race—have instinctive foundations, but foundations that must have both environmental and ideological supports in order to become manifest. Explicit in their work and implicit in the work of Erikson is a repudiation in the field of ethics of the entire Kantian tradition of the separation of nature from freedom, history, and the realm of moral action.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barrett and Yankelovich,Ego and Instinct.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robert Lifton, “On Death and the Continuity of Life: A ‘New’ Paradigm,”History of Childhood Quarterly 1, no. 4 (Spring 1974): 681–96.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Freud posited in his later theory beginning withBeyond the Pleasure Principle (1920) an unconscious need for union, which is similar to what Erikson is speaking about under the rubric of generativity and Lifton with the idea of symbolic immortality. The difference is that Freud never disentangled his later concept of Eros from his earlier Helmholtzian model of sexual energies. In addition, in Erikson and Lifton, generativity and symbolic immortality take on a considerably different valuation tone, are more directly associated with the central organizing processes of the ego, and are actively invoked as major interpretative concepts in their psychologies.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robert Butler and Myrna Lewis,Aging and Mental Health (St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1973), p. 23.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elaine Cumming and William Henry,Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement (New York: Basic Books, 1966). For critiques of the disengagement theory of aging see Bernice Neugarten et al., “Personality and Patterns of Aging,” and Arnold M. Rose, “A Current Theoretical Issue in Social Gerontology,” inMiddle Age and Aging, ed. Bernice Neugarten (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    James N. Lapsley,Salvation and Health (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1972); and William Beardslee,A House for Hope (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beardslee,House for Hope, p. 120.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibid., pp. 120 and 124.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ibid., pp. 120–21.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibid, p. 98.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ibid., pp. 101–102.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lapsley,Salvation and Health, p. 53.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barrett and Yankelovich,Ego and Instinct, p. 150.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Beardslee,House for Hope, p. 68. For Whitehead's basic discussions of his understanding of God see hisReligion in the Making (New York: Meridian Press, 1960), pp. 66–80, 91–109, 143–50;Process and Reality (New York: Harper & Row, 1960), pp. 46–52, 519–33; Scienceand the Modern World (New York: Mentor Books, 1956), pp. 173–80.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Beardslee,House for Hope, p. 71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don S. Browning
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Chicago Divinity SchoolChicago

Personalised recommendations