Population and Environment

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 89–111 | Cite as

The coevolution of population and environment: The ecology and ideology of feedback relations in Pakistan

  • Michael R. Dove


A new approach to the study of population and environment is proposed, based on Norgaard's theory of “co-evolution.” This theory is applied to two developments currently underway in Pakistan: the transfer of tree cover from public forests to private farms, and the partial replacement of woodfuel by dungfuel in household hearths. Both developments are characterized by feedback from the ecosystem to the sociosystem, which consists of a shift of regulatory mechanisms and complexity from the former to the latter. The efficacy of this feedback depends on an accurate perception of the process by the participating population. These perceptions are more accurate in the case of the forest-farm transition than the woodfuel-dungfuel transition, and this explains why the latter appears less sustainable than the former. Accuracy of perception also varies systematically between government officials and local peoples, primarily due to openness to explanations of behavior based on population/resource pressure. It is concluded that external development agencies have a potentially important role to play in demystifying perception of feedback processes between ecosystem and sociosystem.


Regulatory Mechanism Local People Government Official Tree Cover Partial Replacement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abernethy, V. (1988). Editorial: The road taken.Population and Environment 10(1), 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal, B. (1986).Cold hearths and barren slopes: The woodfuel crisis in the third world. Riverdale (MD.): Riverdale Co. for Institute of Economic Growth.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard, G. & Kristoferson, L. (1985).Agricultural residues as fuel in the third world. IIED Energy Information Programme, Technical Report No.4. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  4. Bernier, F. (1891).Travels in the Mogul Empire: AD 1656–1668. Archibald Constable (Tr.). Delhi: S. Chand.Google Scholar
  5. Blaikie, P. (1985).The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Bokhari, A.S. (1989). Pakistan: A review and analysis of forest policy and legislation. Consultant's Report. Islamabad: World Bank.Google Scholar
  7. Buhler, G. (Tr.) (1964).The laws of Manu. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (Orig. 1886. Oxford University Press.)Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, T. (1992). Socio-economic aspects of household fuel use in Pakistan. In M.R. Dove & C. Carpenter (Eds.).The sociology of natural resources in Pakistan and adjoining countries: Case studies in applied social science (pp. 304–329). Lahore: Vanguard Press for the Mashal Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Carpenter, C. (1990). Women and livestock, fodder, and uncultivated land in Pakistan: A summary of role responsibilities.Society and Natural Resources 4, 65–79.Google Scholar
  10. Cernea, M.M. (1985). Alternative units of social organization sustaining afforestation strategies. In M.M. Cernea (Ed.).Putting people first: sociological variables in rural development (pp. 267–293). New York: Oxford University Press for The World Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Champion, H.G., Seth, S.K., Khattak, G.M. (1965).Forest types of Pakistan. Peshawar: Pakistan Forest Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Dewees, P.A. (1989). The woodfuel crisis reconsidered: Observations on the dynamics of abundance and scarcity.World Development 17(8), 1159–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dove, M.R. (1990). The anthropology of development vs. development anthropology: Mediating the forester-farmer relationship in Pakistan.Practicing Anthropology 13(2), 21–28.Google Scholar
  14. Dove, M.R. (1992a). Foresters' beliefs about farmers: An agenda for social science research in social forestry.Agroforestry Systems 17, 13–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dove, M.R. (1992b). The dialectical history of “jungle” in the subcontinent.Journal of Anthropological Research 48(3), 231–253.Google Scholar
  16. Eckholm, E.P. (1976).Losing ground: Environmental stress and world food prospects. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. for the Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Government of Pakistan (G.O.P.) (1962). TheWest Pakistan forest manual, Vol.I. Peshawar: G.S.&P. Dept.Google Scholar
  18. Kangle, R.P. (1988). TheKautilya Arthasastra. 3 Vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (Orig. 1969. Bombay: Bombay University Press.)Google Scholar
  19. Leach, G. (1987).Household energy in South Asia. London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
  20. Macdonell, A.A. & Keith, A.B. (1958).Vedic index of names and subjects, 2 vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (Orig. 1912. London.)Google Scholar
  21. Michie, B.H. (1986). Indigenous technology and farming systems research: Agroforestry in the Indian desert. In J.R. Jones & B.J. Wallace (Eds.).Social sciences and farming systems research (pp. 221–244). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  22. Norgaard, R.B. (1981). Sociosystem and ecosystem coevolution in the Amazon.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8, 238–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norgaard R.B. (1984a). Coevolutionary agricultural development.Economic Development and Culture Change 32(3), 525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Norgaard R.B. (1984b). Coevolutionary development potential.Land Economics 60(2), 160–173.Google Scholar
  25. Norgaard R.B. (1987). Economics as mechanics and the demise of biological diversity.Ecological Modelling 38, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norgaard R.B. (1988). Sustainable development: a co-evolutionary view.Futures (December), 606–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norgaard R.B. (1989). The case for methodological pluralism.Ecological Economics 1, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rao, S. (1957). History of our knowledge of the Indian fauna through the ages.Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 54(2), 251–280.Google Scholar
  29. Rappaport, Roy A. (1978). Maladaptation in social systems. In J. Friedman & M.J. Rowlands (Eds.).Evolution of Social Systems, (pp. 49–71). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rauf, M.A. (1981).Forestry development in Pakistan: A study of human perspectives. Peshawar: Pakistan Forest Institute.Google Scholar
  31. Repetto, R. (1988).The forest for the trees? Government policies and the misuse of forest resources. Washington, D.C: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Sardar, M.R. (1986). Mountain farmers' perceptions of soil erosion and response to soil conservation. Ph.D. dissertation, S.U.N.Y. Syracuse.Google Scholar
  33. Sheikh, M.I. (1986).A case study on hurries—Acacia nilotica block plantations for wood production in Pakistan. Peshawar: Pakistan Forest Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Shiva, V. (1989).Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  35. Sopher, D.E. (1980). Indian civilization and the tropical savanna environment. In D.R. Harris (Ed.).Human ecology in savanna environments, (pp. 185–207). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, M., Warburton, M., & Hatley, T. (1986).Uncertainty on a Himalayan scale: An institutional theory of environmental perception and a strategic framework for the sustainable development of the Himalaya. London: Ethnographica.Google Scholar
  37. Whyte, R.O. (1968).Grasslands of the monsoon. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  38. Wolf, E.R. (1982).Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Dove
    • 1
  1. 1.East-West CenterProgram on EnvironmentHonolulu

Personalised recommendations