Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative evaluation of the cyclic strength of 15Kh2NMFAA steel on the basis of strain and energy approaches

  • Scientific-Technical Section
  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

Abstract

A comparison is made of the cyclic strength of 15Kh2NMFAA steel in three conditions, namely, normal, with increased brittleness, and with increased plasticity. Evaluation on the basis of the strain approach in the form of curves of the ranges of total strain Δεt vs the number of cycles until the occurrence of a crack Ni revealed different locations and slopes for different conditions of the steel. The energy criteria, namely, the energy of full deformation per cycle ΔWt and the total energy of full deformation Wt, have a generalized character and the experimental results form a common file for the three conditions of 15Kh2NMFAA steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Standards for Strength Calculation for Atomic Power Station Equipment and Piping (PNAÉ G-7-002-86) [in Russian], Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1989).

  2. N. A. Makhutov, A. Z. Vorob'ev, M. M. Gadenin, et al., The Strength of Structures in Low-Cycle Loading [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. P. Kogaev, N. A. Makhutov, and A. P. Gusenkov, Strength and Life Calculations of Machine Parts and Structures [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feltner and Morrow, “The hysteresis energy of microplastic strain as a criterion of fatigue failure,” Tekh. Mekh., No. 1, 20–29 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. R. Halford, “The energy required for fatigue,” J. Mater.,1, No. 1, 3–18 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. M. Radhakrishnan, “An analysis of low cycle fatigue based on hysteresis energy,” Fatigue Eng. Mater. and Struct.,3, No. 1, 75–84 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Puškár and S. Golovin, Kumulácia Poskodenia v Procese Únavy, VEDA, Bratislava (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Kliman and M. Bílý, “Hysterézna energia pri opakovanom zatazovani,” Kovové Materialy,4, No. 2, 508–518 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Kliman, “Determination of service life on the basis of the energy criterion,” The Mechanical Fatigue of Metals. Proceedings of the Sixth International Colloquium [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1983), pp. 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. T. Troshchenko, Fatigue and Inelasticity of Metals [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Golos and Él'in, “A theory of accumulation of fatigue damages based on the criterion of specific energy of total strain,” Sovrem. Mashinostr., Ser. B, No. 1, 64–72 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. G. Mazepa and V. A. Yukhanov, “The influence of contrasting heat treatment cycles on the cyclic properties of 15Kh2NMFAA steel,” Probl. Prochn., No. 10, 29–32 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 3, pp. 21–27, March, 1994.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazepa, A.G. A comparative evaluation of the cyclic strength of 15Kh2NMFAA steel on the basis of strain and energy approaches. Strength Mater 26, 181–186 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209392

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209392

Keywords

Navigation