Volunteer attrition is a common problem for Big Brothers/Big Sisters agencies. The present study investigated the utility of a self-report personality inventory, the 16 PF, as an attrition screening tool. Through discriminant analysis, the 16 PF correctly classified 100% of committed and uncommitted volunteers (N= 22). Committed volunteers tended to be more-conceptual, conscientious, and feelings-oriented than uncommitted volunteers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Carrilio, T. (1988).Development of effective measures to screen volunteers working with children, report. Philadelphia, PA: BB/BS of America.
Cattell, R., Eber, H., & Tatsuoka, T. (1986).The 16 PF handbook. Champaign, IL: IPAT.
Herman, K.C. (1992). Enhancing screening for child and youth care work with problem-specific measures: An example with Big Brothers/Big Sisters volunteers.Child and Youth Care Forum, 22(6), 459–476.
Herman, K.C., & Usita, P.M. (1992). Predictive validity of the 16 PF in screening Big Brothers/Big Sisters volunteers,Psychological Reports, 74(1), 249–250.
Klein, L. (1988).Program management manual. Philadelphia, PA: BB/BS of America.
Meissen, G.J., & Lounsbury, J.W. (1981). A comparison of expectations of volunteers, children, and parents in a Big Brother/Big Sister program.Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 250–256.
Rubin, A., & Thorelli, I.M. (1984). Egoistic motives and longevity of participation by social service volunteers.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(3), 223–235.
About this article
Cite this article
Herman, K.C., Usita, P.M. Predicting Big Brothers/Big Sisters volunteer attrition with the 16 PF. Child Youth Care Forum 23, 207–211 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209229
- Discriminant Analysis
- School Psychology
- Screening Tool
- Personality Inventory
- Volunteer Attrition