Advertisement

Child and Youth Care Forum

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 275–290 | Cite as

Correlates of maternal involvement in on-site and off-site day care centers

  • Jay Fagan
Articles

Abstract

This study used an ecological framework to examine correlates of maternal involvement in on-site and off-site day care centers serving infants. Maternal involvement was defined as the amount of time mothers spend in the center, participation in caregiving in the center, and frequency and diversity of maternal communications with caregivers. On-site mothers who reported higher levels of separation anxiety from children spent significantly more time in the center. Child age was negatively related to the amount of time spent in the program among on-site mothers.

Keywords

Care Center School Psychology Separation Anxiety Ecological Framework Time Mother 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, A. (1991). Fathers' participation in day care.Early Child Development and Care, 66, 115–126.Google Scholar
  2. Baber, K. M., & Monaghan, P. (1988). College women's career and motherhood expectations: New options, old dilemmas.Sex Roles 19, 189–203.Google Scholar
  3. Barglow, P., Vaughn, B., & Molitor, N. (1987). Effects of maternal absence due to employment on the quality of infant-mother attachment in a low-risk sample.Child Development, 58, 945–954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Belsky, J., & Rovine, M. (1988). Nonmaternal care in the first year of life and infant-parent attachment security.Child Development, 59, 157–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowlby, J.(1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1, Attachment). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  6. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss (Vol. 2, Separation). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1987).Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (expanded ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Is early intervention effective? A report on longitudinal evaluations of preschool programs (Vol.2). Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Child Development.Google Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, R. (1992). Employer supported child care.Child and Youth Care Forum, 21, 361–366.Google Scholar
  11. Burchinal, M. R., Bryant, D. M., Lee, M. W., & Ramey, C. T. (1992). Early day care, infant-mother attachment, and maternal responsiveness in the infant's first year.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 383–396.Google Scholar
  12. Caldwell, B. (1985). What is quality day care? In B. Caldwell & A. Hilliard (Eds.),What is quality day care? Washington, D.C.: NAEYC.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, S. (1979). Mother-infant interaction as a function of maternal ratings of temperament.Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 10, 67–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carey, W., & McDevitt, S. C. (1978). Revision of theInfant Temperament Questionnaire.Pediatrics, 61, 735–739.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cochran, M. (1988). Parental empowerment in family matters: Lessons learned from a research program. In D.R. Powell (Ed.),Parent education as early childhood intervention: Emerging directions in theory, research, and practice. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  16. Fiene, R. J. (1979). Theoretical model for computing adult-child ratios. Harrisburg, PA: Bureau of Child Development, Association of Regulatory Administration.Google Scholar
  17. Fullard, W., McDevitt, S. C., & Carey, W. B. (1984). Assessing temperament in one- to three-year-old children.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 9, 205–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenberger, E., Goldberg, W.A., Crawford, T., & Granger, J. (1988). Beliefs about the consequences of maternal employment for children.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 35–59.Google Scholar
  19. Greenberger, E., Goldberg, W. A., & Hamill, S. (1989). Spousal support for work and parenting. In E. Greenberger,Survey measures for the study of work, parenting, and well-being. Irvine, CA: University of California, Program in Social Ecology.Google Scholar
  20. Greenberger, E., & O'Neil, R. (1990). Parents' concerns about their child's development: Implications for fathers' and mothers' well-being and attitudes toward work.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 621–635.Google Scholar
  21. Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). The inner resources of school achievement: Motivational mediators of children's perceptions of their parents.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 508–517.Google Scholar
  22. Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents' involvement in children's schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model.Child Development, 65, 237–252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hock, E., McBride, S., & Gnezda, M. T. (1989). Maternal separation anxiety: Mother-infant separation from the maternal perspective.Child Development, 60, 793–802.Google Scholar
  24. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975).Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Yalem University, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
  25. Klein, P. (1984). The relation of Israeli mothers toward infants in relation to infants' perceived temperament.Child Development, 55, 1212–1218.Google Scholar
  26. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Prodromidis, M. (1992). Nonmaternal care and the security of infant-mother attachment: A reanalysis of the data.Infant Behavior and Development, 15, 78–83.Google Scholar
  27. Lamb, M.E., Thompson, R., Gardner, W., & Charnov, E. (1985).Infant-mother attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Maccoby, E., Snow, M. E., & Jacklin, C. (1984). Children's dispositions and mother-child interaction at 12 and 18 months: A short-term longitudinal study.Developmental Psychology, 20, 459–472.Google Scholar
  29. Mason, K.O., & Lu, Y. (1988). Attitudes toward women's familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977–1985.Gender and Society, 2, 39–57.Google Scholar
  30. McKey, R.H., Condelli, L., Ganson, H., Barrett, B.J., Mcconkey, C., & Plantz M.C. (1985).The impact of Head Start on children, families, and communities (DHHS Publication No. 85-31193). Washington, DC: CSR Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Meyerhoff, M.K., & White, B. (1986). Making the grade as parents.Psychology Today, 20(9), 38–45.Google Scholar
  32. Parker, F.L., Piotrkowski, C.S., & Peay, L. (1987). Head Start as a social support for mothers: The psychological benefits of involvement.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 220–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Peters-Martin, P., & Wachs, T. (1984). A longitudinal study in temperament and its correlates in the first 12 months.Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 285–298.Google Scholar
  34. Powell, D. R. (1978). Correlates of parent-teacher communication frequency and diversity.The Journal of Educational Research, 71, 333–343.Google Scholar
  35. Powell, D. R. (1988). Emerging directions in parent-child intervention. In D. R. Powell (Ed.),Parent education as early childhood intervention. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  36. Powell, D. R. (1989).Families and early childhood programs. Washington, D.C.: NAEYC.Google Scholar
  37. Schumacher, J.L., Weinraub, M., & Belsky, J. (1991).Child Care as Social Support Scale. Unpublished scale. Philadelphia: Temple University.Google Scholar
  38. Shimoni, R., & Ferguson, B. (1992). Rethinking parent involvement in child care programs.Child and Youth Care Forum, 21, 105–118.Google Scholar
  39. Spanier, G. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–32.Google Scholar
  40. Sroufe, L.A. (1988). The role of infant-caregiver attachment in development. In Belsky, J., & Nezworski, T. (Eds.),Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 18–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Swick, K. J., & McKnight, S. (1989). Characteristics of kindergarten teachers who promote parent involvement.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 4, 19–29.Google Scholar
  42. Weissbourd, B. (1992). Making child care family-centered: A vision for the 90's.Child and Youth Forum, 21, 385–397.Google Scholar
  43. White, K. R., Bush, D. W., & Casto, G. C. (1985). Learning from previous reviews of early intervention.The Journal of Special Education, 19, 417–428.Google Scholar
  44. White, K. R., Taylor, M. J., & Moss, V. D. (1992). Does research support claims about the benefits of involving parents in early intervention programs?Review of Educational Research, 62, 91–125.Google Scholar
  45. Whitehead, L. C. (1988). Cohesion and communication between families and day care: A proposed model.Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 17, 255–267.Google Scholar
  46. Zigler, E. F., & Freedman, J. (1987). Head Start: A pioneer of family support. In S. L. Kagan, D. R. Powell, B. Weissbourd,& E. F. Zigler (Eds.),America's family support programs: Perspectives and prospects. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Zigler, E. F., & Turner, P. (1982). Parents and day care workers: A failed partnership? in E. F. Zigler & E. W. Gordon (Eds.),Day care: Scientific and social policy issues. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay Fagan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social AdministrationTemple UniversityPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations