Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 411–430 | Cite as

Calcium channel antagonists, part I: Fundamental properties: Mechanisms. classification, sites of action

  • Lionel H. Opie
Article

Summary

Ca2+ channel antagonists are agents that interact with the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel in a highly specific way. The prototype agents of cardiovascular importance are verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem, in historical order of appearance. These agents all have different molecular structures and bind separately with receptor sites located in or near the calcium channel, at molecular sites still to be fully identified. There are probably three distinct receptor sites (V, N, D) which stand in relation to the “gate” of the long-acting “L” calcium channel. There is probably overlap among the receptor sites, especially between the V and D sites to explain their common properties. All three agents inhibit the voltage-dependent calcium channel in vascular smooth muscle and also myocardial slow calcium channels. The ratio of the arterial to the myocardial effect is an index of the arterial selectivity, generally held to be a desirable property because the negative inotropic effect is usually a liability. The general clinical impression that nifedipine is the agent most active in vascular tissue in relation to the myocardial effect is supported by data on the relative potencies of these three agents on blood perfused dog preparations and by a comparison of the potency on rat vascular (portal vein) versus myocardial effects. Nonetheless all three agents are highly active in the inhibition of K+-induced vascular contractions (nifedipine 10−9 M to 10−8 M; verapamil 10−7 M to 10−6 M; and diltiazem 5×10−7 M to 10−6 M; concentrations for 50% inhibition of K+-induced vascular contractions in rat or rabbit aorta; comparative data for resistance vessels not available). The clinical impression that verapamil and diltiazem are more active on nodal tissue is also supported by a comparison of potencies on blood perfused dog nodal preparations in comparison with effects on coronary flow, with verapamil and diltiazem being approximately 10× more potent on the AV node than increasing coronary blood flow, so that the nodal effect is first detected. These basic pharmacological properties explain why all these three agents have clinical effects relevant to inhibition of vascular contraction (antihypertensive and antianginal effects) and only verapamil and diltiazem have clinically relevant inhibitory effects on the AV node (inhibition of supraventricular tachycardias). The comparative potencies of verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine in angina and hypertension will be examined in Parts II and III of this review.

Key words

calcium antagonists verapamil nifedipine diltiazem binding sites classification of calcium antagonists calcium channels 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fleckenstein A, Tritthard H, Fleckenstein B, Herbst A, Grun G. A new group of competitive Ca antagonists (iproveratril, D600, prenylamine) with highly potent inhibitory effects on excitation-contraction coupling in mammalian myocardium.Pflug Arch Physiol 1969;307:25(abstract).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fleckenstein A. Specific inhibitors and promoters of calcium action in the excitation-contraction coupling of heart muscle and their role in the prevention or production of myocardial lesions. In: Harris P, Opie LH, eds.Calcium and the heart. London: Academic Press, 1971. p. 135.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sperelakis N. Properties of calcium-dependent slow action potentials, and their possible role in arrhythmias. In: Opie LH, ed.Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular disease. New York: Raven Press, 1984, Pp. 277–291.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Godfraind T, Miller R, Wibo M. Calcium antagonism and calcium entry blockade.Pharmacol Rev 1986;38:321–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murphy KMM, Gould RJ, Largent BL, et al. A unitary mechanism of calcium antagonist drug action.Proc Natl Acad Sci 1983;80:860–864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glossmann H, Ferry DR, Lubbecke F, et al. Calcium channels: direct identification with radioligand binding studies.Trends Pharmacol Sci 1982;3:431–437.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glossmann H, Ferry DR, Goll A, et al. Calcium channels: basic properties as revealed by radioligand binding studies.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1985;7(Suppl 6):S20-S30.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spedding M: Calcium antagonist subgroups.Trends Pharm Sci 1985;6:109–114.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcia ML, King VF, Siegl PKS, et al. Binding of Ca2+ entry blockers to cardiac sarcolemmal membrane vesicles.J Biol Chem 1986;261:8146–8157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balwierczak JL, Johnson CL, Schwartz A. The relationship between the binding site of [3H]d-cis-diltiazem and that of other non-dihydropyridine calcium entry blockers in cardiac sarcolemma.Molec Pharmacol 1987;31:175–179.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schramm M, Thomas G, Towart R, et al. Novel dihydropyridines with positive inotropic action through activation of Ca2+ channels.Nature 1983;303:535–537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Defeudis FV. Calcium antagonist subgroupsTrends Pharm Sci 1985;6:237–238.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Opie LH, Singh BN: Calcium channel antagonists. In: Opie LH, ed.Drugs for the heart, second expanded edition. Orlando: Grune and Stratton, 1987, Pp. 34–53.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hondeghem L, Katzung BG. Time and voltage-dependent interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with cardiac sodium channels.Biochim Biophys Acta 0978;472:373–398.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weld FM, Coromilas J, Rottman JN, et al. Mechanisms of quinidine-induced depression of maximum upstroke velocity in ovine cardiac Purkinje fibers.Circ Res 1982;50:369–376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Green FJ, Farmer BB, Wiseman GL, et al. Effect of membrane depolarization on binding of [3H] nitrendipine to rat cardiac myocytes.Circ Res 1985;56:576–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kanaya S, Arlock P, Katzung BG, et al. Diltiazem and verapamil preferentially block inactivated calcium channels.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1983;15:145–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Catterall WA, Curtis BM. Molecular properties of voltagesensitive calcium channels. In: Lichtlen PR, ed.6th International Adalat Symposium. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1986. Pp. 375–382.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanguinetti MC, Kass RS. Voltage-dependent block of calcium channel current in the calf Purkinje fiber by dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists.Circ Res 1984;55:336–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Opie LH. Calcium ions, drug action and the heart — with special reference to calcium channel blockers (calcium antagonist drugs). In: Denborough MA, ed.The role of calcium in drug action. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1987, 103–138.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glossmann H, Striessnig J, Hymel L, et al. Purification and reconstitution of calcium channel drug receptor sites.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schwartz A. Mechanisms of action of calcium channel modulators: an update.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bean BP. Two kinds of calcium channels in canine atrial cells. Differences in kinetics, selectivity and pharmacology.J Gen Physiol 1985;86:1–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hess P, Lansman JB, Nilius B, et al. Calcium channel types in cardiac myocytes: Modulation by dihydropyridines and β-adrenergic stimulation.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1986;8(Suppl 9):S11-S21.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reuter H, Prod'hom B, Kokubun S, et al. Calcium channels in the heart: properties and modulation by dihydropyridine enantiomers.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wagner JA, Snyder SH. Historical overview: From binding sites to channel opening.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reuter H: Electrophysiology of calcium channels in the heart. In: Opie LH, ed.Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular disease. New York: Raven Press, 1984. Pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsien RW, Hess P, Landsman JB. Current views of cardiac calcium channels and their response to calcium antagonists and agonists. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds.Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias. Orlando: Grune and Stratton, 1985. Pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kokubun S, Prod'hom B, Becker C, et al. Studies on Ca channels in intact cardiac cells: voltage-dependent effects and cooperative interactions of dihydropyridine enantiomers.Mol Pharmacol 1986;30:571–584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schneider JA, Sperelakis N. Slow Ca2+ and Na+ responses induced by isoproterenol and methylxanthines in isolated perfused guinea-pig hearts exposed to elevated K+.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1975;7:249–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matsuda H, Noma A. Isolation of calcium current and its sensitivity to monovalent cations in dialysed ventricular cells of guinea-pig.J Physiol 1984;357:533–573.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mullins LJ. The generation of electric currents in cardiac fibers by Na/Ca exchange.Am J Physiol 1979;236:C103-C110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reuter H. Localization of beta-adrenergic receptors, and effects of noradrenaline and cyclic nucleotides on action potentials, ionic currents and tension in mammalian cardiac muscle.J Physiol 1974;242:429–451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reuter H, Scholtz A. The regulation of the calcium conductance of cardiac muscle by adrenaline.J Physiol 1977;264:49–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Catterall WA, Takahashi M, Curtis BM. Molecular properties of dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Benham CD, Tsien RW. Noradrenaline increases L-type calcium current in smooth muscle cells of rabbit ear artery independently of α- and β-adrenoceptors.J Physiol 1987;384:98P.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bolton TB. Mechanisms of action of transmitters and other substances on smooth muscle.Physiol Rev 1979;59:606–718.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Towart R. The selective inhibition of serotonin-induced contractions of rabbit cerebral vascular smooth muscle by calcium antagonistic dihydropyridines. An investigation of the mechanism of action of nimodipine.Circ Res 1981;48:650–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Van Breemen C, Mangel A, Fahim M, et al. Selectivity of calcium antagonist action in vascular smooth muscle.Am J Cardiol 1982;49:507–510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johns A, Leijten P, Yamamoto H, et al. Calcium regulation in vascular smooth muscle contractility.Am J Cardiol 1987;59:18A-23A.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Allen IS, Cohen NM, Dhallan RD, et al. Angiotensin II increases the calcium current in neonatal rat single cardiac myocytes.J Pkysiol 1987A;384:74P.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Allen IS, Cohen NM, Dhallan RD, et al. Phorbol esters increase the rate of spontaneous beating in cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes.J Physiol 1987B;384:77P.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Alvarez JL, Mongo KG, Vassort G. Effects of α1-adrenergic stimulation on the Ca current in single ventricular frog cells.J Physiol 1987;384:76P.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Opie LH.The heart: Physiology, metabolism, pharmacology and therapy. London and Orlando: Grune and Stratton, 1984.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nelson MT, Laher I, Worley J. Membrane potential regulates dihydropyridine inhibition of single calcium channels and contraction of rabbit mesenteric artery.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  46. 45A.
    Lullman H, Timmermans PBMWM, Ziegler A. Accumulation of drugs by resting or beating cardiac tissue.Eur J Pharmacol 1979;60:277–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 46.
    Payet MD, Schanne OF, Ruiz-Ceretti E, et al. Inhibitory action of blockers of the slow inward current in rat myocardium, a study in steady state and rate of action.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1980;12:187–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 47.
    Burges RA, Gardiner DG, Carter AJ, et al. Amlodipine: Long-term natriuretic and antihypertensive activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats with developing and established hypertension.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    Taira N. Differences in cardiovascular profile among calcium antagonists.Am J Cardiol 1987;59:24B-29B.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 49.
    Nayler WG, McInnes I, Swann JB, et al. Some effects of iproveratril (Isoptin) on the cardiovascular system.J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1968;161:247–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 50.
    Watanabe AM, Besch HR. Subcellular myocardial effects of verapamil and D600: Comparison with propranolol.J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1974;191:241–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 51.
    Godfraind T, Kaba A. Blockade or reversal of contraction induced by calcium and adrenaline in depolarized arterial smooth muscle.Br J Pharmacol 1969;36:549–560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 52.
    Lee KS, Tsien RW. Mechanism of calcium channel blockade by verapamil, D600, diltiazem and nitrendipine in single dialysed heart cells.Nature 1983;302:790–794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 53.
    Hariman RJ, Mangiardi LM, McAllister RG, et al. Reversal of the cardiovascular effects of verapamil by calcium and sodium: Differences between electrophysiologic and hemodynamic responses.Circulation 1979;59:797–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 54.
    Lang J, Timour-Chah Q, El Chebly M, et al. Effect of gradual rise in plasma calcium concentration on the impairment of atrioventricular nodal conduction due to verapamil.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1986;8:6–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 55.
    Vanhoutte PM. The Expert Committee of the World Health Organization on Classification of Calcium Antagonists: The viewpoint of the rapporteur.Am J Cardiol 1987;59:3A-8A.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 56.
    Nayler WG, Dillon JS, Daly MJ. Cellular sites of action of calcium antagonists and β-adrenoeeptor blockers. In: Opie LH, ed.Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular disease. New York: Raven Press, 1984. Pp. 181–191.Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    Godfraind T. Classification of calcium antagonists.Am J Cardiol 1987;59:11B-23B.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 58.
    Opie LH, Davey DA. Biological membranes in hypertension: Is control of intracellular calcium and other ions mediated by a membrane defect.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987;488:154–173.Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    Hermsmeyer RK. Calcium channel modulation by dihydropyridine calcium antagonists in vascular muscle.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    Finkel AS, Hirst GDS, van Helden DF. Some properties of excitatory junction currents recorded from submucosal arterioles of guinea-pig ileum.J Physiol 1984;351:87–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 61.
    Chiu AT, McCall DE, Thoolen MJMC, et al. Ca++ utilization in the constriction of rat aorta to full and partial α1- adrenoceptor agonists.J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1986;238:224–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 62.
    Beckeringh JJ, Michel MC, Brodde O-E. The hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol as a measure of the efficacy of alpha-adrenoceptor agonists in rat aorta.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    Ruffolo RR. Differences in vascular α1- and β2-adreno-ceptor occupancy-response coupling: Relationship to inhibition of vasoconstrictor responses by calcium channel antagonists.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  65. 64.
    Folkow B, Hallback M, Jones JV, et al. Dependence on external calcium for the noradrenaline contractility of the resistance vessels in spontaneously hypertensive and renal hypertensive rats, as compared with normotensive controls.Acta Physiol Scand 1977;1:84–97.Google Scholar
  66. 65.
    Adelstein RS, Eisenberg E. Regulation and kinetics of the actin-myosin-ATP interaction.Ann Rev Biochem 1980;49:921–956.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 66.
    Rapaport RM, Murad F. Endothelium-dependent and nitrovasodilator-induced relaxation of vascular smooth muscle: role of cyclic GMP.J Cycl Nucl Prot Phosphoryl Res 1983;9:281–296.Google Scholar
  68. 67.
    Rapaport RM, Draznin MB, Murad F. Endothelium-dependent relaxation in rat aorta may be mediated through cyclic GMP-dependent protein dephosphorylation.Nature 1983;306:174–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 68.
    Murphy RA, Gerthoffer WT. Cell calcium and contractile system regulation in arterial smooth muscle. In: Opie LH, ed.Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular disease. New York: Raven Press, 1984. Pp. 75–84.Google Scholar
  70. 69.
    Mras S. Effects of calcium on stress and myosin phosphorylation in swine carotid media.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1986;8(Suppl 8):S80-S84.Google Scholar
  71. 70.
    Ljung B. Vascular selectivity of felodipine.Drugs 1985;29(Suppl 2):46–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 71.
    Chaffman M, Brogden RN. Diltiazem: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy.Drugs 1985;29:387–454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 72.
    Winslow E, Martorana M, Jones DNC, et al. Do calmodulin antagonists exert significant electrophysiological effects.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  74. 73.
    Mannhold R. Calmodulin antagonistic actions of Ca antagonists.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  75. 74.
    Bostrom S-L, Ljung B, Mardh S, et al. Interaction of the antihypertensive drug felodipine with calmodulin.Nature 1981;292:777–778.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 75.
    Walsh MP. Effects of felodipine (a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker) and analogues on calmodulindependent enzymes.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  77. 76.
    Quinn P, Briscoe MG, Nuttall A, et al. Species variation in arterial-myocardial sensitivity to verapamil.Cardiovasc Res 1981;15:398–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 77.
    Winniford MD, Fulton KL, Corbett JR, et al. Propranolol-verapamil versus propranolol-nifedipine in severe angina pectoris of effort: a randomized, double-blind crossover study.Am J Cardiol 1985;55:281–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 78.
    Joshi PI, Dalal JJ, Ruttley MSJ, et al. Nifedipine and left ventricular function in beta-blocked patients.Br Heart J 1982;45:457–459.Google Scholar
  80. 79.
    Millard RW, Lathrop DA, Grupp G, et al. Differential cardiovascular effects of calcium channel blocking agents: potential mechanisms.Am J Cardiol 1982;49:499–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 80.
    Iijima T, Yanagisawa T, Taira N. Increase in the slow inward current by intracellularly applied nifedipine and nicardipine in single ventricular cells of the guinea-pig heart.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1984;16:1175–1177.Google Scholar
  82. 81.
    Henry P, Borda L, Schuchleib R. Chronotropic and inotropic effects of vasodilators. In: Lichtlen PR, Kimaur E, Taira N, eds.International Adalat panel discussion. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica 1979. Pp. 14–21.Google Scholar
  83. 82.
    Porter CB, Walsh RA, Badke FR, et al. Differential effects of diltiazem and nitroprusside on left ventricular function in experimental chronic volume overload.Circulation 1983;68:685–692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 83.
    Krebs R. Adverse effects with calcium antagonists.Hypertension 1983;5(Suppl 2):125–129.Google Scholar
  85. 84.
    Smith HJ, Goldstein RA, Griffith JM. Regional contractility. Selective depression of ischemic myocardium by verapamil.Circ Res 1975;54:629–635.Google Scholar
  86. 85.
    Lumley P, Robertson MJ. Experimental conditions can differentially affect calcium channel blocker potency in guinea-pig cardiac muscle.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  87. 86.
    Schwartz A, Grupp G, Millard RW, et al. Calcium channel blockers: possible mechanisms of protective effects on the ischemie myocardium.Am Physiol Soc 1981;191–210.Google Scholar
  88. 87.
    Nayler WG, Grau A, Slade A. A protective effect of verapamil on hypoxic heart muscle.Cardiovasc Res 1976;10:650–662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 88.
    Ruiz-Ceretti E, Zumino AP, Schanne OF. Effects of TTX and verapamil on the upstroke components of the action potential from the atrioventricular node of the rabbit.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1978;10:95–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 89.
    Iijima T, Taira N. Effects of manganese ions and diltiazem on the spontaneous action potential of the canine atrioventricular node cell.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1983;15:863–866.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 90.
    Weiss AT, Lewis BS, Halon DA, et al. The use of calcium with verapamil in the management of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.Int J Cardiol 1983;4:275–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 91.
    Singh BN, Nademanee K. Use of calcium antagonists for cardiac arrhythmias.Am J Cardiol 1987;59:153B-162B.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 92.
    Rowland E, McKenna WJ, Gulker H, et al. Comparative effects of diltiazem and verapamil on atrioventricular conduction and atrioventricular reentry tachycardia.Circ Res 1983;52(Suppl 1):163–168.Google Scholar
  94. 93.
    Bauer JH, Reams G. Short- and long-term effects of calcium entry blockers on the kidney.Am J Cardiol 1987;59:66A-71A.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 94.
    Landmark K. Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of long-term therapy with nifedipine slow-release tablets.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1985;7:12–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 95.
    Loutzenhier R, Epstein M, Horton C. Inhibition by diltiazem of pressure-induced afferent vasoconstriction in the isolated perfused rat kidney.Am J Cardiol 1987;59:72A-75A.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 96.
    Isshiki T, Amodeo C, Messerli FH, et al. Diltiazem maintains renal vasodilation without hyperfiltration in hypertension: Studies in essential hypertensive man and the spontaneously hypertensive rat.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther, in press, 1987.Google Scholar
  98. 97.
    Guazzi MD, De Cesare N, Galli C, et al. Calcium-channel blockade with nifedipine and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with captopril in the therapy of patients with severe primary hypertension.Circulation 1984;70:279–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 98.
    Muiesan G, Agabiti-Rosei E, Castellano M, et al. Antihypertensive and humoral effects of verapamil and nifedipine in essential hypertension.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1982;4:S325-S329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 99.
    Lijnen P, Fagard R, Amery A. The acute hemodynamic and humoral responses to felodipine and metoprolol in mild hypertension.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  101. 100.
    Agabiti-Rosei E, Muiesan ML, Romanelli G, et al. Similarities and differences in the antihypertensive effect of two calcium antagonist drugs, verapamil and nifedipine.J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:916–924.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 101.
    Kiowski W, Erne P, Bertel O, et al. Acute and chronic sympathetic reflex activation and antihypertensive response to nifedipine.J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:344–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 102.
    Muiesan G, Agabiti-Rosei E, Romanelli G. Adrenergic activity and left ventricular function during treatment of essential hypertension with calcium antagonists.Am J Cardiol 1986;57:44D-49D.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 103.
    Nayler WG, Sturrock WJ. An inhibitory effect of verapamil and diltiazem on the release of noradrenaline from ischaemic and reperfused hearts.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1983;16:331–344.Google Scholar
  105. 104.
    Hiramatsu K, Yamagishi F, Kubota T, et al. Acute effects of the calcium antagonist, nifedipine, on blood pressure, pulse rate, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with essential hypertension.Am Heart J 1982;104:1346–1350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 105.
    Marone C, Luisoli S, Bomio F, et al. Body sodium-blood volume state, aldosterone, and cardiovascular responsiveness after calcium entry blockade with nifedipine.Kidney International 1985;28:658–665.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 106.
    Rojdmark S, Andersson DEH. Influence of verapamil on human glucose tolerance.Am J Cardiol 1986;57:39D-43D.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 107.
    Ravens KG. Effect of nifedipine on glucose tolerance in man. In: Lichtlen PR, ed.6th International Adalat Symposium. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1986. Pp. 367–371.Google Scholar
  109. 108.
    Daniels AR, Opie LH. Effect of slow-release nifedipine on glucose tolerance. In: Lichtlen PR, ed.6th International Adalat Symposium. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1986. Pp. 495–496.Google Scholar
  110. 109.
    Murphy MB, Scriven AJI, Dollery CT. Role of nifedipine in treatment of hypertension.Br Med J 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  111. 110.
    Rademaker M, Thomas RM, Kirby JD, et al. Effect of nifedipine on haemostasis, clotting and thrombolysis in vitro in healthy volunteers.Ann NY Acad Sci 1987, in press.Google Scholar
  112. 111.
    Hiroki T, Morishita Y, Inoue T, et al. Effect of nifedipine on platelet aggregation response to exercise in patients with ischaemic heart disease. In: Lichtlen PR, ed.6th International Adalat Symposium. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1986. Pp. 504–507.Google Scholar
  113. 112.
    Palermo A, Bertalero B, Costantini C, et al. The effect of verapamil on platelet function. In: Fleckenstein A, Laragh JH, eds.Hypertension—the next decade: Verapamil in focus. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987. Pp. 292–297.Google Scholar
  114. 113.
    Van Meel JCA, de Jonge A, Kalleman HO, et al. Vascular smooth muscle contraction initiated by postsynaptic alpha2-adrenoceptor activation is induced by an influx of extracellular calcium.Eur J Pharmacol 1981;69:205–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 114.
    Van Zwieten PA, van Meel CA, Timmermans BMWM. Functional interaction between calcium antagonists and the vasoconstriction by the stimulation of postsynaptic α2-adrenoceptors.Circ Res 1983;52 (Suppl I):77–80.Google Scholar
  116. 115.
    Nayler WG, Poole-Wilson P. Calcium antagonists: Definition and mode of action.Basic Res Cardiol 1981;76:1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 116.
    Lathrop DA, Valle-Aguilera JR, Millard RW, et al. Myocardial tissue.Am J Cardiol 1982;49:613–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 117.
    Thandroyen FT. Protective action of calcium channel antagonist agents against ventricular fibrillation in isolated perfused rat heart.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1982;14:21–32.Google Scholar
  119. 118.
    Thandroyen FT, Higginson L, Opie LH, et al. The influence of verapamil and its isomers on vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial ischemia and adrenergic stimulation in isolated rat heart.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1986;18:645–649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 119.
    Osterrieder W. Inhibition of the fast Na+ inward current by the Ca2+ channel blocker tiapamil.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1986;8:1101–1106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 120.
    Opie LH. Calcium ions, drug action and the heart—with special reference to calcium antagonist drugs.Pharmac Ther 1984;25:271–295.Google Scholar
  122. 121.
    International Society and Federation of Cardiology Working Group. Classification of calcium antagonists for cardiovascular diseases.Am J Cardiol 1987;60:630–632.Google Scholar
  123. 122.
    Fleckenstein A. Specific pharmacology of calcium in myocardium, cardiac pacemakers, and vascular smooth muscle.Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1977;17:149–166.Google Scholar
  124. 123.
    Himori N, Ono H, Taira N. Simultaneous assessment of effects of coronary vasodilators on the coronary blood flow and the myocardial contractility by using the blood-perfused canine papillary muscle.Japan J Pharmacol 1976;26:427–435.Google Scholar
  125. 124.
    Kawai C, Konishi T, Matsuyama E, et al. Comparative effects of three calcium antagonists, diltiazem, verapamil and nifedipine, on the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes.Circulation 1981;63:1035–1042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 125.
    Narimatsu A, Taira N. Effects on atrioventricular conduction of calcium antagonistic coronary vasodilators, local anaesthetics and quinidine injected into the posterior and the anterior septal artery of the atrioventricular node preparation of the dog.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 1976;294:169–177.Google Scholar
  127. 126.
    Ono H, Hashimoto K. Ca2+ antagonism in various parametersof cardiac function including coronary dilation with the use of nifedipine, perhexiline and verapamil. In:Winbury MM, Abiko Y, eds.Ischemic myocardium and antianginal drugs. New York: Raven Press, 1979. Pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
  128. 127.
    Motulsky HJ, Snavely MD, Hughes RJ, et al. Interaction of verapamil and other calcium channel blockers with α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors.Circ Res 1983;52:226–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 128.
    Karliner JS, Motulsky HJ, Dunlap J, et al. Verapamil competitively inhibits α1-adrenergic and muscarinic but not β-adrenergic receptors in rat myocardium.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1982;4:515–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 129.
    Corr PB, Sharma AD. Alpha-adrenergic mediated effects on myocardial calcium. In: Opie LH, ed.Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular disease. New York: Raven Press, 1984. Pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
  131. 130.
    Nayler WG, Thompson JE, Jarrott B. The interaction of calcium antagonists (slow channel blockers) with myocardial alpha adrenoceptors.J Mol Cell Cardiol 1982;14:185–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 131.
    Opie LH, Maseri A. Vasospastic angina. In: Krebs R, ed.Treatment of cardiovascular disease by Adalat (nifedipine). Stuttgart: Schattauer, 1986. Pp. 231–258.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lionel H. Opie
    • 1
  1. 1.Heart Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Medical SchoolUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations