How and why journalists avoid the population-environment connection

Population and Environment volume 18, pages339–372(1997)Cite this article

Abstract

Recent surveys show that Americans are less concerned about population than they were 25 years ago, and they are not connecting environmental degradation to population growth. News coverage is a significant variable affecting public opinion, and how reporters frame a problem frequently signals what is causing the problem. Using a random sample of 150 stories about urban sprawl, endangered species and water shortages, Part I of this study shows that only about one story in 10 framed population growth as a source of the problem. Further, only one story in the entire sample mentioned population stability among the realm of possible solutions. Part II presents the results of interviews with 25 journalists whose stories on local environmental problems omitted the causal role of population growth. It shows that journalists are aware of the controversial nature of the population issue, and prefer to avoid it if possible. Most interviewees said that a national phenomenon like population growth was beyond the scope of what they could write as local reporters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

38,10 €

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Abernethy, V. (1993).Population politics: The choices that shape our future. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altschull, J. H. (1984).Agents of power: The role of the news media in human affairs. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, K. D. (1990). From POET to PISTOL: Reflections on the ecological complex.Sociological Inquiry 60(4), 386–394.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, R. (1993).Eco-Scam: The false prophets of ecological apocalypse. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett, W. L. (1988).News: The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966).The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borquez, J. (1993). Newsmaking and policymaking: Steps toward a dialogue. In R. Spitzer (Ed.).Media and public policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breed, W. (1955, May). Social control in the newsroom.Social Forces, 326–335.

  9. Burd, G. (1972, April–May). The civic superlative: We're no. 1. The press as civic cheerleader.Twin Cities Journalism Review 1.

  10. Cobleigh, I. (1971).All about investing in real estate securities. New York: Weybright and Talley.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Commission on Population Growth and the American Future (1972).Population and the American future. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Commoner, B. (1990).Making peace with the planet. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Constanza, R. (1992). Balancing humans in the biosphere. In L. Grant (Ed.).Elephants in the Volkswagen: Facing tough questions about our overcrowded country (pp. 50–59). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Council on Environmental Quality (1976).Environmental Quality—1976. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Quoted in R. Jackson (1981).Land use in America (p. 129). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crossette, B. (1995, February 5). U.N. meeting plans to discuss crisis in world food supply.The New York Times, p. 12.

  17. Darnton, R. (1975). Writing news and telling stories.Daedalus, 104(2), 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Detjen, J. (1992, Nov. 19). Scientists: Earth near danger level. Knight-Ridder News Service, quoted inAustin American Statesman, p. A6.

  19. Edelman, M. J. (1993). Contestable categories and public opinion.Political Communication, 10(3), 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ehrlich, P. (1968).The population bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ehrlich, P. (1989, Winter). Speaking out on overpopulation: A conspiracy of silence is limiting action on the world's most basic environmental problem.Issues in Science and Technology, 5(2), 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ehrlich, P., & Ehrlich, A. (1990).The population explosion. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ehrlich, P., & Ehrlich, A. (1992). The most overpopulated nation. In L. Grant (Ed.).Elephants in the Volkswagen: Facing tough questions about our overcrowded country, (pp. 125–133). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Entman, R. (1989).Democracy without citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gans, H. (1979).Deciding what's news. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gandy, O. (1982).Beyond agenda-setting. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goodkin, L. (1974).When real estate and home building become big business: Mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures. Boston: Cahners Books.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Graber, D. (1989). Content and meaning: What's it all about?American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Griffin, R., & Molen, D., & Schoenfeld, C., & Scotton, J. (1991).Interpreting public issues. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harrison, P. (1992).The third revolution. London: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hart, R. (1987).The sound of leadership: Presidential communication in the modern age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Homer-Dixon, T., & Boutwell, J., & Rathjens, G. (1993). Environmental change and violent conflict: Growing scarcities of renewable resources can contribute to social instability and civil strife.Scientific American, 268(2), pp. 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hovland, C. I., & Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1965).Experiments on mass communication. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Howell, D. (1992).Scientific literacy and environmental policy: The missing prerequisite for sound decision making. New York: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hueber, G. (1991, April). Americans report high levels of environmental concern, activity.The Gallup Poll Monthly, pp. 6–7.

  37. Iyengar, S. (1989). How citizens think about national issues: A matter of responsibility.American Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 878–900.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Iyengar, S. (1991).Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jackson, R. (1981).Land use in America. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kaniss, P. (1991).Making local news. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kingdon, J. (1973).Congressmen's voting decisions. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lazarsfeld, P. F.. Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968).The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign (3rd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Linsky, M. (1988). The media and public deliberation. In R. Reich (Ed.).The power of public ideas (pp. 205–228). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lippmann, W. (1922).Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  45. McCartney, H. (1987, Spring). Applying fiction conflict situations to analysis of news stories.Journalism Quarterly, 64, 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  46. McCombs, M., Einsiedel, E., & Weaver, D. (1991).Contemporary public opinion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  47. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media.Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  48. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1977). Agenda-setting and the political process. In D. Shaw & M. McCombs (Eds.).The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp.149–156). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  49. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas.Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  50. McMahan, J. (1976).Property development: Effective decision making in uncertain times. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Molotch, H. (1976). The city as growth machine: Toward a political economy of place.American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Molotch, H., & Lester, W. (1974). News as purposive behavior.American Sociological Review, 39, 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Myers, N. (1991).Population, resources, and the environment: The critical challenges. New York: United Nations Population Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Newport, F., & Saad, L. (1992, May). Public support mixed for U.S. efforts to curb world overpopulation.The Gallup Poll Monthly, 320, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984).The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Orians, C. E., & Skumanich, M. (1995).The population-environment connection: What does it mean for environmental policy? (Report issued under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830). Washington, DC: Futures Studies Unit, Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Paletz, D., Reichert, P., & Mclntyre, B. (1971). How the media support local governmental authority.Public Opinion Quarterly, 80–92.

  58. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. (1993, January–March). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse.Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pew Global Stewardship Initiative (1993).Report of findings from focus groups on population, consumption, and the environment. Washington, DC: Beiden & Russonello Research and Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (1992). Land, energy, and water: The constraints governing ideal U.S. population size. In L. Grant (Ed.).Elephants in the Volkswagen: Facing tough questions about our overcrowded country (pp. 18–31). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Postel, S. (1993). Facing water scarcity. In L. Starke (Ed.).State of the world, 1993 (pp. 22–41). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Reese, S., & Danielian, L. (1989). Intermedia influence and the drug issue: Converging on cocaine. In P. Shoemaker (Ed.).Communication campaigns about drugs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rogers, E., Dearing, J., & Bregman, D. (1993). The anatomy of agenda-setting research.Journal of Communication, 43(2), 68–85.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Royal Society and National Academy of Sciences (1992). The Royal Society and the National Academy of Sciences on population growth and sustainability.Population and Development Review 18(2), 375–378.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sears, P. (1956). The process of environmental change by man. Originally published in W. E. Thomas (Ed.).Man's role in changing the face of the Earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted in R. L. Smith (Ed.), (1972).The ecology of man: An ecosystems approach (pp. 129–138). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Simon, J. (1981).The ultimate resource. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Simon, J. (1990).Population matters. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Spitzer, R. (Ed.). (1993).Media and public policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Stocking, H., & Gross, P. (1989).How do journalists think? A proposal for the study of cognitive bias in newsmaking. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tuchman, G. (1978).Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ward, B., & Dubos, R. (1972).Only one Earth. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wenk, Jr., E. (1986).Tradeoffs: Imperatives of choice in a high-tech world. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Werbos, P. (1992). Energy and population: Transitional issues and eventual limits. In L. Grant (Ed.).Elephants in the Volkswagen: Facing tough questions about our overcrowded country (pp. 32–49). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wheeler, T. (Speaker/Moderator). (1994).Covering population as a local story (Cassette tape 5, Society of Environmental Journalists Fourth National Conference). Sylva, NC: Goodkind of Sound.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wimmer, R., & Dominick, J. (1983).Mass media research: An introduction (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Communication, University of Southwestern Louisiana, P.O. Box 43650, 70504-3650, Lafayette, LA

    Dr. T. Michael Maher

Authors
  1. Dr. T. Michael Maher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dr. T. Michael Maher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maher, T.M. How and why journalists avoid the population-environment connection. Popul Environ 18, 339–372 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208512

Download citation

Keywords

  • Random Sample
  • Significant Variable
  • Population Growth
  • Water Shortage
  • Environmental Problem