Population and Environment

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 395–427 | Cite as

An ecological-economic assessment of deregulation of international commerce under GATT Part I

  • Herman Daly
  • Robert Goodland
Article

Keywords

International Commerce 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acheson, A.L.K., Chant, J.F. & Prachowny, M.F.J. (Eds.) (1972). Bretton Woods revisited. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, P. (1991). Odious debts: Loose lending, corruption, and the Third World's environmental legacy. Toronto: Earthscan (Probe International).Google Scholar
  3. Adcock, J. & Kildow, J. (1992). Environment and the trading system.Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 16:55–62.Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal, A. & Narain, S. (1991). Global warming in an unequal world.International Journal of Sustainable Development 1(1):98–104.Google Scholar
  5. Agarwal, A. & Narain, S. (1992). View from the South: We can no longer subsidize the North. New York:United Nations Development Forum 20 (3): 15–30.Google Scholar
  6. Agarwal, A. & Narain, S. (1992). North writes script for UNCED Tamasha in Brazil.Economic Times (India). February 9.Google Scholar
  7. Ahmad, Y., El Serafy, S. & Lutz, E. (Eds.) (1989). Environmental accounting for sustainable development. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, K., & Blackhurst, R. (Eds.) (1992). The greening of world trade issues. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  9. Anderson, K. (1992). Agricultural trade liberalization and the environment: a global perspective. The World Economy (Jan) 15(1):153–171.Google Scholar
  10. Arden-Clarke, C. (1991a). Conservation and sustainable management of tropical forests: The role of ITTO and GATT. Gland, Switzerland: World Wildlife Fund, Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  11. Arden-Clarke, C. 1991b. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, environmental protection and sustainable development. Gland, Switzerland, World Wildlife Fund for Nature.Google Scholar
  12. Arden-Clarke, C. (1991c). The cruel tradeoff. The Guardian. September 13.Google Scholar
  13. Arden-Clarke, C. (1992a). South-North terms of trade, environmental protection and sustainable development. Gland, Switzerland: World Wildlife Fund, Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  14. Arden-Clarke, C. (1992b). International trade, GATT, and the environment. Gland, Switzerland: WWF Position paper (May).Google Scholar
  15. Arden-Clarke, C. (1992c). The GATT report on trade and environment: A critique by the World Wide Fund for Nature. Gland, Switzerland: WWF (March).Google Scholar
  16. Audley, J. (1992). Critical analysis of Arthur Dunkel's report on trade and the environment. The Sierra Club's Center for Environmental Innovation. March 17.Google Scholar
  17. Baumol, W. J. (1971). Environmental protection, international spillovers and trade. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  18. Bhagwati, J. (1991). The world trading system at risk. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bhagwati, J. (1988). Protectionism. Boston, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bhagwati, J. and Patrick, H. (1990). Aggressive unilateralism. London, Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  21. Bhagwati, J. and Srinivasan, T. N. (1983). On the choice between capital and labor mobility. J. Internat. Economics 14:209–221.Google Scholar
  22. Barbier, E. (1990). Managing trade and environment: the demand for raw ivory in Japan and Hong Kong. World Economy (UK) 14:407–430.Google Scholar
  23. Barr, M., Honeywell, R. and Sofel, S. (1991). Labor and environmental rights in the proposed Mexico-United States Free Trade Agreement. Houston Journal of International Law. 14(1): 1–84.Google Scholar
  24. Baucus, M. (1991). Senator Max Baucus Reports. Trade and the Environment. September 17.Google Scholar
  25. Bhalla, A. S. (ed.). (1992). Environment, employment and development. Geneva, International Labor Office: 177 p.Google Scholar
  26. Bovard, J. (1991). The fair trade fraud. New York, St Martin's Press. 330 p.Google Scholar
  27. Bown, W. (1990). Trade deals a blow to the environment. New Scientist (UK). 128:20–21.Google Scholar
  28. Braga, C. (1992). Tropical forests and trade policy: The cases of Indonesia and Brazil. (247–274)in Low, P. (ed.). International Trade and Environment. Washington D.C. The World Bank. 365 p.Google Scholar
  29. Birdsall, N. and Wheeler, D. (1992). Trade policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens? Washington DC, World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Brown, G. E., Goold, J. J. and Cavanagh, J. (1992). Making trade fair: a social and environmental charter for North America. World Policy Journal (Spring): 309–327.Google Scholar
  31. Cameron, J. O'G., Mjolo-Thamage, T. and Robinson, J. C. (1992). Relationship between environmental agreements and instruments related to trade and development. Centre for International Environmental Law, King's College, London. Geneva, UNCED Research Paper 35.Google Scholar
  32. Cameron, J. and Ward, H. (1992). The multilateral trade organization: a legal and environmental assessment. Gland, Switzerland, World Wildlife Fund, Research Report (May).Google Scholar
  33. CAP Briefing, (1988). Farm policy and the environment: North-South links. Catholic Institute for International Relations. (UK).Google Scholar
  34. Charnovitz, S. (1991). Exploring the environmental exceptions in GATT Article XX. Journal of World Trade 25(5):37–55.Google Scholar
  35. Charnovitz, S. (1991). Trade links: Labor and the environment. International Economic Insights. 11:38–39.Google Scholar
  36. Citizen Trade Watch Campaign. (1992). Congressional Briefing on the December 20, 1991 Uruguay Round GATT “Final Act Text.” February 13. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  37. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica (November): 386–405.Google Scholar
  38. Cobb, J. B. Jr. (1992). Growth without progress? Loyola, Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (in press).Google Scholar
  39. Copeland, B.R. (1991). International trade in waste products in the presence of illegal disposal. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20(2): 143–162.Google Scholar
  40. Culbertson, J. (1991). U.S. free trade with Mexico: progress or self destruction? The Social Contract. (Fall): 7–11.Google Scholar
  41. Daly, H. E. (1991). Ecological economics and sustainable development-in Rossi, C. and Tiezzi, E. (eds.) Ecological Physical Chemistry. Amsterdam, Elesevier. 651 p.Google Scholar
  42. Daly, H. E. (1991). Sustainable growth: a bad oxymoron. Grassroots Development 15(3).Google Scholar
  43. Daly, H. E. (1992a). From adjustment to sustainable development: the obstacle of free trade. Loyola Law School ms (29 Feb).Google Scholar
  44. Daly, H. E. (1992b). Review of international policies to accelerate sustainable development in developing countries, and related policies. Daly H.E. and Cobb, J. (1989). For the common good. Boston, Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  45. Dawkins, K. (1992). Balancing: policies for just and sustainable trade. Minneapolis, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.Google Scholar
  46. Dean, J. (1991). Trade and the environment: a survey of the literature (15–28)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment. Washington D.C., The World Bank.Google Scholar
  47. Donahoe, T. (1991). The case against a North American free trade agreement. Columbia Journal of World Business 26(2):92–96.Google Scholar
  48. The December 20, 1991 GATT Uruguay Round “Final Act” text must be rejected. Letter from U.S. Environmental and Consumer Groups. 1992. January 9.Google Scholar
  49. Diwan, I. and Shafik, M. (1992). Investment, technology and the global environment (263–286) in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment. Washington D.C. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  50. Doddwell, D. (1992). GATT says rainforest “services” should be paid for. Financial Times. February 12.Google Scholar
  51. Dohlman, J. (1990). The trade effects of environmental legislation. The OECD Observer (Feb–Mar).Google Scholar
  52. The Economist. (1989). Greening Europe: The freedom to be cleaner than the rest. October 14.Google Scholar
  53. The Economist. (1991). Free trade's green hurdle. June 15. 61-22.Google Scholar
  54. El Serafy, S. (1989). The proper calculation of income from depletable natural resources—in Ahmad, Y. et al. (eds.) Environmental accounting for sustainable development. Washington D.C., The World Bank.Google Scholar
  55. El Serafy, S. (1991). The environment as capital (168-175)in Costanza R. (ed.) Ecological Economics. New York, Columbia University press.Google Scholar
  56. Engen, J. (1991). Trading for a greener world. Global Trade 111(6):20–22.Google Scholar
  57. Fletcher, S. and Tiemann, M. (1992). Environment and trade. Washington DC., Congressional Research Service 1B92006.Google Scholar
  58. GATT, (1971). Industrial pollution control and international trade. Geneva, GATT Studies in International Trade 1.Google Scholar
  59. GATT, (1982). Conciliation: United States — prohibition of imports of tuna and tuna products from Canada. Report of the Panel. L/5178.Google Scholar
  60. GATT, (1991). On environment, economy and GATT. GATT Briefing, No. 5–6.Google Scholar
  61. GATT, (1992). Trade and the environment. Geneva, GATT Secretariat. Paper No. 1529. (12 February): 35.Google Scholar
  62. GATT. (1992). News Release: Expanding trade can help solve environmental problems. February 3.Google Scholar
  63. GATT. (1992). Press Release: Environment concerns must not be kidnapped by protectionists says Arthur Dunkel. February 11.Google Scholar
  64. GATT Briefing. (1991). Green Trade: will there be a greening of GATT? Rongead, France.Google Scholar
  65. Goodland, R., Daly, H.E. and El Serafy, S. (eds.) (1991). Environmentally sustainable economic development: building on Brundtland. Washington DC, The World Bank, Environment Department Paper 46.Google Scholar
  66. Goodland, R. (1992). The case that the world has reached limits: more precisely that current throughput growth in the global economy cannot be sustained. Population and Environment. 13(3): 167–182.Google Scholar
  67. Goodland R. and Daly H.E. (1992a). Approaching global environmental sustainability. World Development. 2:35–41.Google Scholar
  68. Goodland, R. and Daly, H. E. (1993). Why Northern income growth is not the solution to Southern poverty. Ecological Economics.Google Scholar
  69. Grimmett, J.J. (1991). Environmental regulation and the GATT. Washington DC, Congressional Research Service 91-285 A.Google Scholar
  70. Grossman G. and Krueger, A. and National Bureau of Economic Research. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement: timber. 39.Google Scholar
  71. Hahn, R.W. and Richards, K. R. (1989). The internationalization of environmental regulation. Harvard International Law Journal 30(2):421–426.Google Scholar
  72. Hansson, G. (1990). Harmonization and international trade. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Harrod, R. F. (1951). The life of John Maynard Keynes. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Heckscher, E.F. and Ohlin, B. (1991). The Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Hines, C. (1990). Green protectionism: halting the four horsemen of the free trade Apocalypse. London, Earth Resources Research.Google Scholar
  76. Hudson, S. (1992). Trade, environment, and the pursuit of sustainable development (86-89)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment, Washington D.C., The World Bank.Google Scholar
  77. Jackson, J. H. (1992). World trade rules and environmental policies: congruence or conflict? Washington and Lee law Review 49(4): 1227–1278.Google Scholar
  78. Joyce, C. (1992). U.S. environmentalists oppose world trade deal. New Scientist (UK). 133.Google Scholar
  79. Kelley, M., Kamp, D., Gregory, M. and Rich, D. (1991). U.S. Mexico free trade negotiations and the environment: exploring the issues. Columbia Journal of World Business. 26(2):42–58.Google Scholar
  80. Keynes, J.M. (1933). National self-sufficiency—in Moggeridge, D. (ed.) The Collected Writings of J.M. Keynes (vol. 21). London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  81. Korten, D. (1992). Development heresy and the ecological revolution. Development (Philippines). (January 2).Google Scholar
  82. Krugman, P. R. (1990). Rethinking international trade. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  83. Krutilla, K. (1991). Environmental regulation in an open economy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20:127–142.Google Scholar
  84. Lopez, R. (1992). The environment as a factor of production (199-124)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment. Washington D.C. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  85. Low, P. (1992). International trade and the environment: an overview. (1-25)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment, Washington D.C., The World Bank.Google Scholar
  86. Low, P. and Yeates, A. (1992). Do “dirty industries” migrate? (135-154)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment. Washington D.C. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  87. Lucas, R., Wheeler, D. and Heftige, H. (1992). Economic development, environmental regulation and the international mitigation of toxic industrial pollution: 1960-1988. (109–132)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment, Washington D.C., The World Bank.Google Scholar
  88. Lubinski. (1989). Protection of the natural environment and trade between developed and developing capitalist countries. Warsaw, Economic papers 21:22–37.Google Scholar
  89. Meade, J.E. (1965). The stationary economy. Allen and Unwin. London.Google Scholar
  90. Meade, J.E. (1976). The just economy. Allen and Unwin. London.Google Scholar
  91. Meade, J.E. (1972). The controlled economy. State University of New York Press. Albany.Google Scholar
  92. Meadows, D.L., Meadows, D.H., and Randers, J. (1991). Beyond the limits. Mills, Vt.Google Scholar
  93. McCracken, J. (1991). GATT and the environment: who wins and who is interested? Libertas: European Review 1(2):58–67.Google Scholar
  94. McDonald, J. (1991). Greening the GATT: Harmonizing free trade and environmental protection in the new world order. Environmental Law (in press).Google Scholar
  95. Mies, M. (1991). Consumption patterns of the North: the cause of environmental destruction and poverty in the South: women and children first. Geneva, UNCED (UNICEF & UNFPA).Google Scholar
  96. Nordhaus, W. and Tobin, J. (1972). Is growth obsolete? -in Economic Growth. New York, Columbia Univ. Press, National Bureau of Economic Research, General Series, No: 96E.Google Scholar
  97. OECD. (1975). The polluter pays principle: definition, analysis, implementation. Paris, OECD 117.Google Scholar
  98. Office of Technology Assessment, (1992). Trade and environment: conflicts and opportunities. Washington, DC, OTA, U.S. Congress.Google Scholar
  99. Parikh, J. and Parikh, K. (1991). Consumption patterns: the driving force of environmental stress. Geneva, UNCED.Google Scholar
  100. Pearson, C. and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (1982). Policies and their environmental implications for developing countries. New York, UNCTAD, (2).Google Scholar
  101. Pearce, D. (1992). Should GATT be reformed for environmental reasons? London, CSERGE Discussion Paper GEC 92-01.Google Scholar
  102. Petersmann, E-U. (1991). Trade policy, environmental policy and the GATT: why trade rules and environmental rules should be mutually consistent. Aussenwirtschaft (Switzerland) 46(2):197–221.Google Scholar
  103. Public Citizen's Congress Watch. (1991). Everything you always wanted to know about GATT but were afraid to ask. November. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  104. Radetzki, M. (1992). Economic growth and environment. (175-(194)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment. Washington D.C., The World Bank.Google Scholar
  105. Raghavan, C. (1990). Recolonization: GATT, the Uruguay Round and the Third World. London, Zed Books and the Third World Network.Google Scholar
  106. Rainforest Action Network. (1991). How free-trade will affect rainforests. August. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  107. Reinstein, R. (1991). Trade and Environment. U.S. State Department. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  108. Ritchie, M. (1990). GATT, agriculture and the environment: the U.S. double zero plan. Ecologist (UK) 20(6):214–220.Google Scholar
  109. Ritchie, M. (1990). Trading away our environment. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. May.Google Scholar
  110. Robbins, L.C. (1972). An autobiography of an economist.Google Scholar
  111. Robertson, D. (1992). Trade and the environment: harmonization and technical standards. (423–444)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment. Washington D.C., The World Bank.Google Scholar
  112. Robinson, H. (1988). Industrial pollution abatement: The impact on the balance of trade. Canadian Journal of Economics. 21(1): 187–199.Google Scholar
  113. Rubin, S. and Graham, T. (eds.) (1982). Environment and trade: the relationship of international trade and environmental policy. Allanheld Osman.Google Scholar
  114. Runge, C. (1990). Environmental risk and the world economy. The American Prospect. 1(1): (March). 114–118.Google Scholar
  115. Runge, C. F. and Nolan, R. (1990). Trade in disservices: environmental regulation and agricultural trade. Food Policy (UK) 15:3–7.Google Scholar
  116. Runge, C.F. (1990). Trade protectionism and environmental regulations: new non-tariff barriers. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business. SP. 2(1):47–61.Google Scholar
  117. Safadi, R. and Low, P. (1992). International policy coordination and environmental quality (397–418)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment. Washington D.C. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  118. Sahai, S. (1992). The Dunkel draft: highly dangerous for the Indian farmer. Development Alternatives 2(6):1–2; 8–9.Google Scholar
  119. Sarcevic, P. and van Houtte, H. (1990). Legal issues in international trade.Google Scholar
  120. Schneider, G. et. al. (1989). Task force: environment and the internal market. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  121. Schmidt-Bleek, F. and Wohlmeyer, H. (1991). Trade and environment. Laxenberg, Austria. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
  122. Shrybman, S. (1990). International trade and the environment: an environmental assessment of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. The Ecologist 20(1): (Jan–Feb). 30–34.Google Scholar
  123. or]Shrybman, S. (1991–1992). Trading away the environment. World Policy Journal 9:93–110.Google Scholar
  124. Siebert, C. H., Eichberger, J., Gronych, R. and Pethig, R. (1980). Trade and environment: a theoretical enquiry. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  125. Singh, J. and Lackan, V. (1990). Business ethics and the international trade in hazardous wastes. Journal of Business Ethics (Netherlands), 8(11):889–899.Google Scholar
  126. Snape, R. (1991). Environment, international trade, and GATT. Monash University, Dept of Economics, Seminar Papers 8:1–42.Google Scholar
  127. Snape, R. (1991). International regulation of subsidies. World Economy. June: 14(2):139–164.Google Scholar
  128. Smith, C. and Beckmann, S. L. (1991). Exports of pesticides from U.S. ports in (1990): focus on restricted pesticide exports. Los Angeles, Foundation for Advancements in Science and Education.Google Scholar
  129. Sorsa, P. (1992). GATT and environment: basic issues and some developing country concerns. (447–472)in Low, P. (ed.) International Trade and the Environment. Washington, D.C., The World Bank.Google Scholar
  130. Summers, L. (1992). Foreword (iii–v)in Low, P. (ed.) International trade and the environment. Washington, DC. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  131. Thomas, V. & Nash, J. (1991). Best practices in trade policy. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Tietenberg, T. (1990). The poverty connection to environmental policy. Challenge 33(5):6–32.Google Scholar
  133. Tobey, J. (1991). Effects of environmental policy towards agriculture on trade: some considerations. Food Policy. (UK). 16:90–94.Google Scholar
  134. Tobey, J. (1990). The effects of domestic environmental policies on patterns of world trade: an empirical test. Kyklos. 43(2):191–209.Google Scholar
  135. Tully, S. (1989). What the greens mean for business. Fortune 120(9):159–164.Google Scholar
  136. Ulph, A. (1990). Choice of environmental policy instruments and strategic international trade. University of Southampton. Dept of Economics. Discussion Papers in Economics and Econometrics. (UK). 9012.Google Scholar
  137. UN, (1992). Multilateral treaties deposited with the Secretary-General. New York, United Nations E.92.V.4,92-1-133423-3.Google Scholar
  138. UN, (1992). World Investment Report 1992: Transnational corporations as engines of growth. New York, United Nations E.92.ll.A.19.Google Scholar
  139. UNCTAD. (1991). Environment and international trade. Report by the Secretary General of UNCTAD. Geneva.Google Scholar
  140. UNDP, (1992). Human development report. New York, UNDP.Google Scholar
  141. U.S. Congress, (1991). Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Economic and environmental implications of the proposed trade agreement with Mexico. Joint Hearing, 102nd Congress, 1st session 23 Apr. and 8 May, U.S., Govt Printing Office.Google Scholar
  142. Utne Reader. (1991). Trading our way to devastation. March–April.Google Scholar
  143. Veenendaal and J. Opschoor, (1986). Botswana's beef exports to the EEC: Economic develop- ment at the expense of a deteriorating environment. Free University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  144. Verbruggen, H. (1991). Contours of a sustainable international trade system. Internationale Spectator (Netherlands) 45:686–691.Google Scholar
  145. Wallach, L. (1991). The Dec. 20, 1991 Uruguay Round “Final Act” text is worse than expected on environmental, health, and consumer issues. Public Citizen, Memorandum. December 26.Google Scholar
  146. Weiss, E. B. (1992). Environment and trade as partners in sustainable development: a commentary. American Journal of International Law 86(4): 728–735.Google Scholar
  147. Whalley, J. (1991). Interface between environmental and trade policies. Economic Journal of the Royal Economic Society (UK) 101:180–189.Google Scholar
  148. World Bank News. (1992). Free trade can benefit all countries, Bank official says. February 20.Google Scholar
  149. World Bank (1989). World Bank support for the environment: a progress report. Development Committee paper 22:41.Google Scholar
  150. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). WCED (The Brundtland Commission) Our common future. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  151. World Commission on Environment and Development, (1992). Our Common Future reconvened. London.Google Scholar
  152. Young, M. (1992). Sustainable investment and resource use: equity, environmental integrity, economic efficiency. Man and Biosphere MAB/UNESCO. Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herman Daly
    • 1
  • Robert Goodland
    • 2
  1. 1.The School of Public-AffairsUniversity of MarylandCollege Park
  2. 2.The Environmental DivisionThe World BankN.W.

Personalised recommendations