Research in Higher Education

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 41–72 | Cite as

Individual and campus characteristics associated with student loan default

  • J. Fredericks Volkwein
  • Bruce P. Szelest
Article

Abstract

This research addresses the question of whether student loan repayment and default behaviors are more highly related to the characteristics of the college attended or to the characteristics of the individual student aid recipient. Our model development and variable selection is guided by theories of human capital and public subsidy, ability to pay perspectives, organizational structural/functional approaches, and student-institution fit models. To conduct the study, three national databases were merged: the NPSAS study of individual recipients of federal financial aid, IPEDS data containing campus financial and enrollment characteristics, and a third containing College Board Survey data. Our findings erode the basis for current national policies and proposed SPRE legislation that hold institutions accountable for the loan defaults of former students. Loan repayment and default behavior can be substantially predicted by the precollege, college, and postcollege characteristics of individual borrowers. Majoring in a scientific or technological discipline, earning good grades, persisting to degree completion, getting and staying married, and not having dependent children are all actions that substantially increase the likelihood of repayment and lower the likelihood of default. In both populations (all borrowers and nonproprietary), we find virtually no evidence of a direct link between default behavior and type of institution or highest degree offered.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich, J. H., and F. D. Nelson (1986). Linear probability, logit and probit models (3rd edition). Beverly Hills, CA. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. American Bankers Association (1994).Consumer Credit Delinquency Bulletin. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W. (1982).Minorities in American Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Bean, J. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition.Research in Higher Education 12(2): 155–187.Google Scholar
  5. Bean, J. (1985). Interaction effects based on class level in an explanatory model of college student dropout syndrome.American Educational Research Journal 22(1): 35–64.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G. (1964).Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special References to Education. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195–203.Google Scholar
  8. Biglan, A. (1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments.Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 204–213.Google Scholar
  9. Blau, F. D., and J. W. Graham (1990). Black-white differences in wealth and asset composition.Quarterly Journal of Economics, May: pp. 321–339.Google Scholar
  10. Cabrera, A. F. (1994). Logistic regression analysis in higher education: An applied perspective. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, X. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cabrera, A. F., A. Nora, and M. B. Castaneda (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process: A structural model.Research in Higher Education 33(5): 571–593.Google Scholar
  12. Cabrera, A. F., A. Nora, and M. B. Casta¯neda (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention.The Journal of Higher Education 64(2): 123–139.Google Scholar
  13. Cabrera, A. F., J. O. Stampen, and W. L. Hansen (1990). Exploring the effects of ability to pay on persistence in college.Review of Higher Education 13(3): 303–336.Google Scholar
  14. Cabrera, A. F., M. B. Casta¯neda, A. Nora, and D. Hengstler (1992). The convergence between two theories of college persistence.The Journal of Higher Education 63(2): 143–164.Google Scholar
  15. College Board (1992).Washington Research Report, No. 2. Washington, DC: The College Board.Google Scholar
  16. College Board (1993).Trends in Student Aid 1983 to 1993. Washington, DC: The College Board.Google Scholar
  17. Dynarski, M. (1991). Analysis of factors related to default.Mathematica Policy Research. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. Feinberg, S. E. (1983).The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, R. (1976).The Over-Educated American. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Greene, L. L. (1989). An Economic analysis of student loan default.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11: 61–68.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, R. H. (1991).Organizations: Structures, Processes and Outcomes (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Hanusheck, E. K., and J. E. Jackson (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Knapp, L. G., and T. G. Seaks (1992). An analysis of the probability of default on federally guaranteed student loans.The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(3): 404–411.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, G. L. (1989). Trends in student aid: 1963–64 to 1988–89.Research in Higher Education 30(6): 547–561.Google Scholar
  25. Mallette, B. I., and A. F. Cabrera (1991). Determinants of withdrawal behavior: An exploratory study.Research in Higher Education 32(1): 179–194.Google Scholar
  26. Manski, C. F., and D. A. Wise (1983).College Choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mortgage Bankers Association of America (1994).National Delinquency Survey. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Mow, S. L., and M. T. Nettles (1990). Minority student access to, and persistence and performance in college: A review of the trends and research literature. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research, VI (pp. 35–105). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  29. National Center for Education Statistics (1989).1987 National Postsecondary Study: Data File User's Manual. Washington, DC: Westat, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Nettles, M. T., A. R. Thoeny, and E. J. Gosman (1986). Comparative and predictive analyses of black and white students' college achievement and experiences.Journal of Higher Education 57(3): 289–318.Google Scholar
  31. Nora, A. (1987). Determinants of retention among Chicano students: A structural model.Research in Higher Education 26(1): 31–59.Google Scholar
  32. Nora, A., L. C. Attinasi, and A. Matonack (1990). Testing qualitative indicators of college factors in Tinto's attrition model: A community college student population.Review of Higher Education 13(3): 337–356.Google Scholar
  33. Pascarella, E. T., and P. T. Terenzini (1982). Contextual analysis as a method for assessing residence group effects.Journal of College Student Personnel 23: 108–114.Google Scholar
  34. Pascarella, E. T., and P. T. Terenzini (1991).How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Peterson's Guides (1990). Princeton, NJ: Peterson's Guides.Google Scholar
  36. Press, S. J., and W. Wilson (1978). Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association 73: 699–705.Google Scholar
  37. Regan, C., and J. F. Volkwein (1993). The influence of organizational variables on disparities between male and female faculty salaries. A paper presented for the 18th Annual Conference, Association for the Study of Higher Education, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  38. Stage, F. K. (1990). LISREL: An introduction and applications in higher education. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, VI (pp. 427–466). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Stampen, J. O., and A. F. Cabrera (1986). Exploring the effects of student aid on attrition.Journal of Financial Aid 2: 28–39.Google Scholar
  40. Stoecker, Judith L. (1993). The Biglan classification revisited.Research in Higher Education 34(4): 451–464.Google Scholar
  41. Terenzini, P. T., C. Theophildes, and W. G. Lorang (1984). Influences on students' perceptions of their academic skill development during college.Journal of Higher Education 55(5): 621–636.Google Scholar
  42. Terenzini, P. T., and T. M. Wright (1987). Influences on students' academic growth during four years of college.Research in Higher Education 26(2): 161–170.Google Scholar
  43. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research.Review of Educational Research 45: 89–125.Google Scholar
  44. Tinto, V. (1987).Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. U. S. News and World Report (1990).America's Best Colleges. Washington. DC.Google Scholar
  46. Volkwein, J. F. (1986). Campus autonomy and its relationship to measures of university quality.Journal of Higher Education 57(5): 510–528.Google Scholar
  47. Volkwein, J. F. (1991). Improved measures of academic and social integration and their association with measures of student growth. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  48. Volkwein, J. F., M. C. King, and P. T. Terenzini (1986). Student-faculty relationships and intellectual growth among transfer students.The Journal of Higher Education 57(4): 413–430.Google Scholar
  49. Volkwein, J. F., B. Szelest, and A. J. Lizotte (1993). The relationship of campus crime to campus and community characteristics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  50. Wilcox, L. (1991). Evaluating the impact of financial aid on student recruitment and retention. In D. Hossler (ed.),New Directions for Institutional Research No. 70. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Wilms, W. W., R. W. Moore, and R. E. Bolus (1987). Whose fault is default?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9(1): 41–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Fredericks Volkwein
    • 1
  • Bruce P. Szelest
    • 1
  1. 1.University at AlbanyAlbany

Personalised recommendations