Skip to main content
Log in

Piroxicam and indometacin suppositories for painful coxarthrosis

  • Originals
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Six orthopaedic clinics in Sweden made a comparison of the effects and side effects of Piroxicam (20mg) and Indometacin (100mg) suppositories in 261 patients with painful coxarthrosis on the waiting list for total hip replacement (THR). The study was designed as a single blind study over 4 weeks. Amount of pain and range of motion was registered before the trial and compared with findings after 4 weeks, including reported side effects. Both drugs gave satisfactory pain relief without any appreciable variation on weightbearing or at rest. On the other hand, the trial showed a significant difference (p=0.0033, Student's-test) between the two drugs as regards the frequency of side effects from the lower gastrointestinal tract, where piroxicam had a lower rate compared with indometacin. No serious complications occurred; 16 patients dropped out, 8 in each group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hast, F.D. Osteoarthrosis. In: Drug Treatment of Rheumatic Diseases. Editor: Dudley Hart, F. International Medical Publishers, Lancaster, England 1978, 112–116.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hedner, T. Comparative Evaluation of NSAID and other Analgesics in Osteoarthrosis. In: Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoarthritis. National Board of Health and Welfare Drug Information Committee Sweden 1989, 2, ISSN 0281-4579.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heynen, G., Dessain, P. piroxicam suppositories for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: An open multicentre study in 116 patients. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm 1983, 6, 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schianterelli, P., Cadel, S. Piroxicam Pharmacologic Activity and Gastrointestinal Damage by Oral and Rectal Route. Arzneimittel-Forschung Drug Res 1981, 31, 1, 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Macca, F., Milani, L., Dal Follo, M., Corbetta, L., Zeni, G., Zuin, R. Attivita terapeutical del Piroxicam per via rettale nelle mallattie reumatiche. Minerva Medica 1984, 75, 811–819.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abruzzo, J.L., Gordon, G.V., Meyers, A.R. Double-blind study comparing piroxicam and aspirin in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Am J Med 1982, 72 (2A), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldie, I.F. Piroxicam and naproxen in osteoarthritis. A clinical comparison. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm 1981, 4, 342–35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alho, A., Jaer, O., Slungaard, U., Holme, I. Piroxicam and Naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip waiting for total hip replacement. Clin Rheumatol 1988, 208–213.

  9. Brogden, R.N., Heel, R.C., Speight, T.M., Avery, G.S. Piroxicam. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficiency. Drugs 1984, 28, 292–302.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldie, I.F. Piroxicam and naproxen in osteoarthritis. A clinical comparison. Am J Med 1982, 72 (2A), 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ersmark, H., Tjornstrand, B., Gudmundsson, G. et al. Piroxicam and indometacin suppositories for painful coxarthrosis. Clin Rheumatol 11, 37–40 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207081

Key words

Navigation