Skip to main content
Log in

An infeasible-interior-point algorithm using projections onto a convex set

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a new class of primal-dual infeasible-interior-point methods for solving linear programs. Unlike other infeasible-interior-point algorithms, the iterates generated by our methods lie in general position in the positive orthant of ℝ2 and are not restricted to some linear manifold. Our methods comprise the following features: At each step, a projection is used to “recenter” the variables to the domainx i s i ≥μ. The projections are separable into two-dimensional orthogonal projections on a convex set, and thus they are seasy to implement. The use of orthogonal projections allows that a full Newton step can be taken at each iteration, even if the result violates the nonnegativity condition. We prove that a short step version of our method converges in polynomial time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Freund, An infeasible-start algorithm for linear programming whose complexity depends on the distance from the starting point to the optimal solution, Working Paper 3559-93-MSA, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Karmarkar, A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming, Combinatorica 4 (1984)373–395.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Kojima, Basic lemmas in polynomial-time infeasible-interior-point methods for linear programs, Research Report B-268, Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Kojima, N. Megiddo and S. Mizuno, A primal-dual infeasible-interior-point algorithm for linear programming, Mathematical Programming 61(1993)261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Kojima, S. Mizuno and A. Yoshise, A primal-dual interior point algorithm for linear programming, in:Progress in Mathematical Programming, Interior-Point and Related Methods, ed. N. Megiddo (Springer, New York, 1989) pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Kojima, S. Mizuno and A. Yoshise, A polynomial-time algorithm for a class of linear complementary problems, Mathematical Programming 44(1989)1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Kojima, S. Mizuno and A. Yoshise, A little theorem of the bigM in interior point methods, Mathematical Programming 59(1993)361–375.

    Google Scholar 

  8. I.J. Lustig, Feasibility issues in a primal-dual interior-point method for linear programming, Mathematical Programming 49(1990/91)145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I.J. Lustig, R.E. Marsten and D.F. Shanno, Computational experience with a primal-dual interior point method for linear programming, Linear Algebra and Its Applications 152(1991)191–222.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Marsten, R. Subramanian, M. Saltzman, I.J. Lustig and D. Shanno, Interior point methods for linear programming: Just call Newton, Lagrange, and Fiacco and McCormick!, Interfaces 20 (1990)105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Megiddo, Pathways to the optimal set in linear programming, in:Progress in Mathematical Programming, Interior-Point and Related Methods, ed. N. Megiddo (Springer, New York, 1989) pp. 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Mizuno, Polynomiality of infeasible-interior-point algorithms for linear programming, Mathematical Programming 67(1994)109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mizuno, M. Kojima, and M.J. Todd Infeasible-interior-point primal-dual potential-reduction algorithms for linear programming, SIAM Journal on Optimization 5(1995)52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Mizuno, M.J. Todd and Y. Ye, A surface of analytic centers and primal-dual infeasible-interior-point algorithms for linear programming, Mathematics of Operations Research 20(1995) 135–162.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.D.C. Monteiro and I. Adler, Interior path following primal-dual algorithms. Part I: Linear programming, Mathematical Programming 44(1989)27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F.A. Potra, An infeasible interior-point predictor-corrector algorithm for linear programming, Report No. 26, Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, USA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. F.A. Potra, A quadratically convergent infeasible interior-point algorithm for linear programming, Report No. 28, Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, USA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Stoer, The complexity of an infeasible interior-point path-following method for the solution of linear programs, Optimization Methods and Software 3(1994)1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Tanabe, Centered Newton method for mathematical programming, in:System Modeling and Optimization, eds. M. Iri and K. Yajima (Springer, New York, 1988) pp. 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Tanabe, Centered Newton method for linear programming: Interior and “exterior” point method (in Japanese), in:New Methods for Linear Programming 3, ed. K. Tone (The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan, 1990) pp. 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Ye, M.J. Todd and S. Mizuno, An\(O(\sqrt {nL} )\)-iteration homogeneous and self-dual linear programming algorithm, Mathematics of Operations Research 19(1994)53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Zhang, On the convergence of a class of infeasible interior-point methods for the horizontal linear complementarity problem, SIAM Journal on Optimization 4 (1994)208–227.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Zhang and D. Zhang, Superlinear convergence of infeasible interior-point methods for linear programming, Mathematical Programming 66(1994)361–378.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research performed while visiting the Institut für Angewandte Mathematik, University of Würzburg, D-87074 Würzburg, Germany, as a Research Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mizuno, S., Jarre, F. An infeasible-interior-point algorithm using projections onto a convex set. Ann Oper Res 62, 59–80 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02206811

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02206811

Keywords

AMS(MOS) subject classification

Navigation