Skip to main content
Log in

A recursive linear programming analysis of the future of the pulp and paper industry in the United States: Changes in supplies and demands, and the effects of recycling

  • Game Theory and Market Games
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impacts of increased paper recycling on the U.S. pulp and paper sector are investigated, using the North American Pulp And Paper (NAPAP) model. This dynamic spatial equilibrium model forecasts the amount of pulp, paper and paperboard exchanged in a multi-region market, and the corresponding prices. The core of the model is a recursive price-endogenous linear programming system that simulates the behavior of a competitive industry. The model has been used to make forecasts of key variables describing the sector from 1986 to 2012, demand for paper would have the greatest impact on the amount of wood used. But the minimum recycled content policies envisaged currently would have no more effect than what will come about due to unregulated market forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.T. Alig, 1993 Overview of the States: State legislators focus on market development, Recycled Paper News 1 (1994) 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.T. Alig, D. Zhang and P.J. Ince, Impacts of minimum recycled content standards on paper recycling, Research Note, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA), News Release, American Forest & Paper Association, New York, Dec. 8, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Paper Institute (API),Statistics of Paper, Paperboard & Wood Pulp, American Paper Institute, New York, 1970–1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Paper Institute, News Release, American Paper Institute, New York, Feb. 13, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. American Paper Institute,Paper, Paperboard & Wood Pulp Capacity, American Paper Institute, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Baker, Demand elasticities fro pulp and paper products in Canada, Research Note, Policy and Economics Directorate, Forestry Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1991.

  8. B. Baker, Foreign demand elasticities fro Canadian pulp and paper products, Research Note, Policy and Economics Directorate, Forestry Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1991.

  9. Canadian Pulp and Paper Association,Canadian Pulp and Paper Capacity, Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, Montreal, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Cremonese, Newsprint capacities by region and process in the United States (1970–1992), Research Note, Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.H. Day, Recursive programming models: A brief introduction, in:Studies in Economic Planning over Space and Time: Contributions to Economic Analysis, G.G. Judge and T. Takayama, eds., American Elsevier, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Durbak, P.J. Ince and T. Manurung, Modeling U.S. trade in pulp and paper commodities: Demand and supply functions by commodity and world region, Research Note, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.B.R. Hazell and R.D. Norton,Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture, MacMillan, 1986.

  14. P.J. Ince, Recycling and long-range timber outlook: Background research report 1993 RPA assessment update, Research Paper, FPL-RP-534, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P.J. Ince, Recycling and long-range timber outlook. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-242, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Jacques, Inter-regional transportation costs of the Canadian pulp & paper industry, Research Note, Policy and Economics Directorate, Forestry Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1991.

  17. M. Kennedy, An economic model of the world oil market, Bell Journal of Economics 5 (1974) 540–577.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.C. Lu, J.T. Alig and P.J. Ince, Demand estimates for pulp, paper and paperboard, Research Note, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.A. McCarl and T.H. Spreen, Price endogenous mathematical programming as a tool for sector analysis, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 (1980) 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miller Freeman Publication, Inc.,Lockwood-Post Directory of the Paper and Allied Trades, Bulkley Dunton, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller Freeman Publication, Inc.,PULP & PAPER 1992 North American Factbook, Miller Freeman Publications, San Francisco, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.G. Roberts and R.G. Prins, Roundwood supply functions for the Canadian solid wood and pulp & paper industries, Research Note, Policy and Economics Directorate, Forestry Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1991.

  23. P.A. Samuelson, Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming, American Economic Review 42 (1952) 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Takayama and G.G. Judge, An interregional activity analysis model of the agricultural sector, Journal of Farm Economics 49 (1964) 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Tobin, A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1 (1969) 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  26. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census,Population Statistics, U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, DC, 1960–1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census,Pulp, Paper, and Board, Current Industrial Reports, U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, DC, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  28. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,Producer Prices and Price Indexes, U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, DC, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, The solid waste dilemma: An agenda for action, Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States: 1990 update, EPA/530-SW-90-042, Washington, DC, 1990.

  31. A.C. Veverka, Economics favor increased use of recycled fiber in most furnishes, Pulp & Paper 9 (1990) 97.

    Google Scholar 

  32. World Bank,World Tables 1991 Edition, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.L. Young, Fiber balance: the dynamics of recycling, inProceedings of Focus '95+: Landmark Paper Recycling Symposium, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1991.

  34. D. Zhang, Modeling the impact of increased wastepaper recycling on the North American pulp and paper industry, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. Zhang and J. Buongiorno, Capacity changes in the U.S. paper and paperboard industries:q theory and empirical models, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23 (1993) 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. Zhang, J. Buongiorno and P. J. Ince, PELPS III: A microcomputer price-endogenous linear programming system for economic modeling, Research Paper FPL-RP-526, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  37. D. Zhang and P.J. Ince, Transportation costs analysis of the U.S. pulp and paper industry, Research Note, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Buongiorno, J. & Ince, P.J. A recursive linear programming analysis of the future of the pulp and paper industry in the United States: Changes in supplies and demands, and the effects of recycling. Ann Oper Res 68, 109–139 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205451

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205451

Keywords

Navigation