Plant and Soil

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 97–105 | Cite as

Germination and emergence of soybean under crusted soil conditions

I. Effect of crust impedance to seedling emergence
  • T. R. Rathore
  • B. P. Ghildyal
  • R. S. Sachan


Attempts were made to work out the effect of crust impedance to seedling emergence under natural field conditions by photographing a series of positions taken by the emerging hypocotyls. Being epigeal in germination, the seedling had to work through a large volume of soil to pull the cotyledons out of the ground. Since the hypocotyl was brittle, it often collapsed at the stress point between the emerging hypocotyl and the buried cotyledons. A number of seedlings subjected to severe impedance stresses often broke off at the hypocotyl hook when the soil surface ruptured. The emergence force of the varieties tested was closely related to their seed weight. The large seeded variety ‘Bragg’ exerted the greatest emergence force (1.86×105 dynes) and the small seeded variety ‘Type-1’ exerted the least (1.24×105 dynes). The variety ‘UPSS-38’ was intermediate both in hundred seed weight and the force that it exerted (1.49×105 dynes). The time taken to develop the steady maximum force was 78, 67 and 60 hours for Bragg, UPSS-38 and Type-1 respectively.

Key Words

Seedling emergence Soil crusting Soybean 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bennett, O. L., Ashley, D. A. and Doss, B. D. 1964 Methods of reducing soil crusting to increase cotton seedling emergence. Agron. J.56, 162–165.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowen, H. D. 1960 Some physical impedance and aeration effects on planted seeds. ASAE paper60, 626.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drew, L. O., Thomas, H. G. and Dickson, D. G. 1971 Seedling thrust versus soil strength. Transactions ASAE14, 315–318.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garner, T. H. and Bowen, H. D. 1963 Mechanics of seedling emergence. Paper presented at the Southest Section meeting of the ASAE, Menphis, Tennessee, Feb. 4–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanks, R. J. and Thorp, F. C. 1957 Seedling emergence of wheat, grain sorghum and soybeans as influenced by soil crust strength and moisture content. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.21, 357–359.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morton, C. T. and Buchele, W. F. 1961 Emergence energy of plant seedlings. Agric. Eng.47, 428–431.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor, H. M. 1972 Compaction of Agricultural Soils (ed.). ASAE monograph. pp 292–312.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vanden Berg, G. E. 1966 New test for vigour. Agric. Res. USDA, AES.14, 14.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams, W. A. 1956 Evaluation of the emergence force exerted by seedlings of small seeded legumes using probit analysis. Agron. J.48, 273–274.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. Rathore
    • 1
  • B. P. Ghildyal
    • 1
  • R. S. Sachan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil ScienceGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and TechnologyPantnagarIndia

Personalised recommendations