Abstract
Linear programming (LP) is widely used to select the manner in which forest lands are managed. Because of the nature of forestry, this application has several unique characteristics. For example, the models consider many different management actions that take place over many years, thus resulting in very large LP formulations with diverse data. In addition, almost none of the data are known with certainty. The most pervasive occurrence of stochastic information is in the production coefficients, which indicate the uncertain response of the managed forest ecosystem to various management options. A “chance-constrained” approach to handling this uncertainty would often be appropriate in forestry applications —managers and decision makers would like to specify a probability with which uncertain constraints are met. Unfortunately, chance-constrained procedures forA-matrix uncertainty produce nonlinear programming problems, which cannot currently be solved for large-scale forestry applications. This paper utilizes a Monte Carlo simulation approach (a linear program is repeatedly solved with randomly perturbedA-matrix coefficients) to describe the distribution of total output when the individual production coefficients are random. An iterative procedure for “chance-constraining” feasibility is developed and demonstrated with this sort of randomA-matrix. An iterative approach is required because the mean and variance of total output are unknown functions of the randomA-matrix coefficients and the level of output required. This approach may have applications in other fields as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints, Oper. Res. 11 (1963) 18–39.
IMSL. Library, Reference Manual (4 volumes) (IMSL Customer Relations, Houston, TX, 1982).
R. Jagannathan, Chance-constrained programming with joint constraints, Oper. Res. 22 (1974). 358–372.
K.N. Johnson and H.L. Scheurman, Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives — discussion and synthesis, Forest Science Monograph 18 (1977) 1–18.
B.L. Miller and H.M. Wagner, Chance constrained programming with joint constraints, Oper. Res. 13 (1965) 930–945.
D.C. Montgomery,Design and Analysis of Experiments, 2nd ed. (Wiley. 1984).
J.B. Pickens and P.E. Dress, Use of stochastic production coefficients in linear programming models: Objective function distribution, feasibility, and dual activities. Forest Science 34 (1988) 574–591.
SAS, SAS User's Guide: Basics (and Statistics) (Version 5, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 1985).
J.A. Sengupta, Stochastic linear programming with chance constraints, Int. Econ. Rev. 11 (1970) 101–116.
J.A. Sengupta,Stochastic Programming: Methods and Applications (American Elsevier, New York, 1972).
USDA Forest Service, RPA-79 assessment — book of procedures, framework for supply analysis (USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 1977).
H.M. Wagner,Principles of Operations Research with Applications to Managerial Decisions (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1975).
G.O. Ware and J.L. Clutter, A mathematical programming system for management of industrial forests. Forest Science 17 (1971) 428–445.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pickens, J.B., Hof, J.G. & Kent, B.M. Use of chance-constrained programming to account for stochastic variation in theA-matrix of large-scale linear programs: A forestry application. Ann Oper Res 31, 511–526 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02204867
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02204867
Key words
- Wildland allocation
- stochastic production estimates
- stochasticA-matrix
- chance-constrained programming