Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of novelty and choice materials on the intransitivity of preferences of children and adults

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors review existing color choice data concerning a decline through childhood in a bias for novelty and intransitive choice linked to novelty. They report a sex difference in which females, across age, are found to exceed males in novelty bias, but not in intransitivity. Results are reported for two new studies designed to assess the generality of the novelty-intransitivity relation by testing with choice materials other than colors. Responses of six-, eight-, and ten-year olds to line drawings were consistent with the model based on color choice, except that no differences between the sexes were found. In contrast to earlier findings adults responding to photographs of faces showed a marked aversion to novelty and much lower levels of intransitivity. Results are taken as supportive of Zajonc's case for a separation between cognitive and aesthetic aspects of mental organization and are related to the mere exposure effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.E. Berlyne,Aesthetics and Psychobiology (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Bradbury, Consistency of children's inconsistent preferences attributable to novelty, Develop. Psychol. 11(1975)9–866.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Bradbury and T.M. Nelson, Transitivity and the patterns of children's preferences, Develop. Psychol. 10(1974)55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Bradbury and M. Moscato, Development of transitivity of preference: Novelty and linear regularity, J. Genetic Psychol. 140(1982)265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Bradbury and C. Plichon, The relative weakness of novelty in children's choices, J. Genetic Psychol. 139(1981)233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Bradbury, L. Shewfelt and R. Gjerek, Intransitivity of preferences of four-year-old children, J. Genetic Psychol. 145(1984)145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.H. Coombs, On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement, J. Exp. Psychol. 55(1958)1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Tversky, Intransitivity of preferences, Psychol. Rev. 76(1969)31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.B. Zajonc, Attitudinal effects of mere exposure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 9(1968). (2, Part 2).

  10. R.B. Zajonc, Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences, Amer. Psychol. 15, 2(1980)151–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradbury, H., Ross, K. The effects of novelty and choice materials on the intransitivity of preferences of children and adults. Ann Oper Res 23, 141–159 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02204843

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02204843

Keywords

Navigation