Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 272–277 | Cite as

Dr. Douglas Taylor and half a century of musculoskeletal Kelvinism

  • N. Bellamy
  • W. W. Buchanan
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor, D. A Table for the degree of involvement in chronic arthritis. Can Med Assoc J, 1937, 36, 608–610.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirshner, B., Guyatt, G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis, 1985, 38 (1), 27–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C.H., Batterman, R.C. Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Med Assoc, 1949, 140, 659–662.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellamy, N. The clinical evaluation of osteoarthritis in the elderly. Clin Rheumatic Dis, 1986, 12, 131–153.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lequesne, M. European guidelines for clinical trials of new antirheumatic drugs. Eular Bulletin, 1980, 9 (Suppl 6), 171–175.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doyle, D.V., Dieppe, P.A., Scott, J., et al. An articular index for the assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheumatic Dis, 1981, 40, 75–78.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellamy, N., O'Leary, S., Grace, E., et al. Osteoarthritis: Evaluation of a multidimensional outcome measure for joint replacement surgery. Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Rheumatology, 1985, 51.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fries, J.F., Spitz, P., Kraines, R.G. et al. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 1980, 23, 137–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smythe, H.A., Helewa, A., and Goldsmith, C.H. “Independent Assessor” and “Pooled Index” as techniques for measuring treatment effects in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol, 1977, 4, 144–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forrester, D.M., Neison, J.W. Abnormalities of the Cartilage Space. In: The Radiology of Joint Disease. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co., 1973, 68–103.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buckland-Wright, J.C. X-ray assessment of activity in rheumatoid disease. Br J Rheumatol, 1981, 22, 3–10.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellamy, N., Newhook, L., Rooney, P.J., et al. Perception-A problem in the grading of sacro-iliac joint radiographs. Scand J Rheumatol 1984, 13, 113–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mewa, A.A.M., Pui, M., Cockshott, W.P., et al. Observer differences in detecting erosions in radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison of posteroanterior, Norgaard and Brewerton views. J Rheumatol, 1983, 10 (2), 216–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meenan, R.F., Gertman, P.M., Mason, J.H., et al. The arthritis impact measurement scales. Further investigations of a health status measure. Arthritis Rheum, 1982, 25 (2), 1048–1053.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huskisson, E.C. Measurement of pain. The Lancet. November 9, 1974, 1127–1130.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ward, J.R., Niethammer, T.A., Egger, M.J. Can we just measure signal joints? Should ring size and walking time be analyzed only in selected patients? Controversies in the Clinical Evaluation of Analgesic-Anti-Inflammatory-Antirheumatic Drugs. Edited by H.E. Paulus, G.E. Ehrlich, E. Lindenlaub, New York, F.K. Schattauer Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Acta Medica Belgica 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Bellamy
    • 1
  • W. W. Buchanan
    • 1
  1. 1.Suite 402 AVictoria Hospital (WT)LondonCanada

Personalised recommendations