Skip to main content
Log in

Different populations of bacteria associated with sheathed and bare regions of roots of field-grown maize

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been previously shown that soil sheaths cling tightly to some portions of all axile roots and cover all but the growing tips of the young roots of field-grown maize. These sheaths overlie immature regions of the roots which have intact epidermal cells with root hairs, and living, thus non-conducting, late metaxylem elements. Loss of the soil sheath in the proximal region coincides with the opening of these large metaxylem vessels. Now, total, and viable counts have been recorded of bacteria associated with the root surface and adhering soil of sheathed and bare regions. These showed some common features, in that populations of similar size were associated with the two root regions in plants beginning to flower. Each population included about the same numbers of bacteria that were viable on each of three selective media (nitrogen-free, Pseudomonas F or MacConkey). However, more spore-formers capable of growth on nitrogen-free media and more fluorescent bacteria were isolated from the sheathed regions. Actinomycetes were absent from sheathed but plentiful on bare regions.

The high numbers of diverse types of bacteria associated with both root surfaces can be related to the previously demonstrated similarity in amounts of organic carbon released from each region. The proliferation of actionomycetes on the bare roots and their exclusion from sheathed roots may in part be due to the lower water status of the bare region, which is related to its greater axial conducting capacity. Thus the distribution of the two types of root surface within an individual root system has important implications for the choice of root and rhizosphere sampling techniques and for root bacterization work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balandreau J 1983 Microbiology of the association. Can. J. Microbiol. 29, 851–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen G D 1980 Misconceptions, concepts and approaches in rhizosphere biology.In Contemporary Microbial Ecology. Eds D C Ellwood, J N Hedger, M J Lathane, J M Lynch and J H Slater. Academic Press. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen G D and Rovira A D 1976 Microbial colonization of plants roots. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R 1985 Plant Microbiology, Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duell R W and Peacock G R 1985 Rhizosheaths on mesophytic grasses. Crop Sci. 25, 880–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallik E, Okon Y and Fischer M 1988 Growth response of maize roots to Azospirillum inoculation: effect of soil organic matter content, number of rhizosphere bacteria and timing of inoculation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20, 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusseder A 1987 The longevity and activity of the primary root of maize. Plant and Soil 101, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyson A and Oaks A 1987 Physical factors involved in the formation of soil sheaths on corn seedling roots. Can. J. Soil Sci. 67, 591–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardson B and Clarholm M 1986 Microbial communities on plant roots.In Microbial Communities in Soil. Eds V Jensen, A Kjoller and L H Sorensen. pp 19–34. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers. London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenberg H 1955 The ‘rhizosphere effect’ of graminaceous plants in virgin soils. Physiol. Plant. 8, 644–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe D C, McCully M E and Wenzel C L 1986 The nodal roots of Zea: their development in relation to structural features of the stem. Can. J. Bot. 64, 2524–2537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleeberger A, Castroph H and Klingmuller W 1983 The rhizosphere microflora of wheat and barley with special reference to gram-negative bacteria. Arch. Microbial. 136, 306–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J M 1983 Soil Biotechnology. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford. 191 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCully M E 1987 Selected aspects of the structure and development of field-grown roots with special reference to maize.In Root Development and Function. Eds P J Gregory, J V Lake and D A Rose, pp 53–70. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCully M E and Canny M J 1985 Localization of translocated14C in roots and root exudates of field-grown maize. Physiol. Plant. 65, 380–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCully M E and Canny M J 1989 Pathways and processes of water and nutrient movement in roots. Plant and Soil.In Press.

  • O'Brein T P and McCully M E 1981 The Study of Plant Structure. Termarcarphi Pty. Ltd. Melbourne, Australia. 350 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie R J 1981 A single medium for the isolation of acetylene-reducing (dinitrogen-fixing) bacteria from soils. Can. J. Microb. 27, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie R J, DeFreitas J R, Ruschel A P and Vose P B 1982 Isolation and identification of N2-fixing bacteria associated with sugar cane (Saccharum sp.). Can. J. Microb. 28, 462–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouatt J W and Katznelson H 1961 A study of the bacteria on the root surface and in the rhizosphere soil of crop plants. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 24, 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira A 1965 Interactions between plant roots and soil microorganisms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 241–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St. Aubin G, Canny M J and McCully M E 1986 Living vessel elements in the late metaxylem of sheathed maize roots. Ann. Bot. 58, 577–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivasithamparam K and Parker C A 1979 Rhizosphere microorganisms of seminal and nodal roots of wheat grown in pots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 11, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuurde J W L and Schippers B 1980 Bacterial colonization of seminal wheat roots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 12, 559–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer J and McCully M E 1982 The rhizosphere in Zea: new insight into its structure and development. Planta 156, 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson E T and Williams S T 1974 Studies on the ecology of actinomycetes in soil. — VII. Actinomycetes in a coastal sand belt. Soil Biol. Biochem. 6, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel C A, McCully M E and Canny M J 1989 Development of water conducting capacity in the root systems of young plants of corn and some other C-4 grasses. Plant Physiol.In press.

  • Williams S T and Davies F L 1965 Use of antibiotics for selective isolation and enumeration of actinomycetes in soil. J. Gen. Microbiol. 38, 251–261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams S T, Shameemullah M, Watson E T and Mayfield C I 1972 Studies on the ecology of actinomycetes in the soil. VI. The influence of moisture tension on growth and survival. Soil Biol. Biochem. 4, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wullstein L H, Bruening M L and Bollen W B 1979 Nitrogen fixation associated with sand grain root sheaths (rhizosheaths) of certain xeric grasses. Physiol. Plant. 46, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wullstein L H and Pratt S A 1981 Scanning electron microscopy ofOryzopsis hymenoides. Am. J. Bot. 68, 408–419.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gochnauer, M.B., McCully, M.E. & Labbé, H. Different populations of bacteria associated with sheathed and bare regions of roots of field-grown maize. Plant Soil 114, 107–120 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02203088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02203088

Key words

Navigation