Skip to main content
Log in

Possibilités et limites de l'imagerie pour l'appréciation des implants mammaires

  • 4. Hauptthema/quatrième thème principal 2. Teil/2ème partie ≪Silicongate≫ seulement un probleme de matériel?
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliographie

  1. Abbes M (1993) Les prothèses mammaires et le cancer du sein. Ann Chir Plast Esthét 38:791–800

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker JLJ (1975) Classification of spherical contractures. Aesthetic Breast Symposium. Scottdale, Arizona

  3. Barker J, Retsky M, Schultz S (1978) Bleeding of silicone from bag-gel breast implants, and its clinical relation to fibrous capsule reaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:836–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg WA, Anderson ND, Zerhouni EA, et al. (1994) MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone breast implants: normal postoperative variants and diagnostic pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol 163:575–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brem RF, Tempany CM, Zerhouni EA (1992) MR detection of breast implant rupture. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:157–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bricout N (1992) Chirurgie du sein. Springer: France, p 425

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chan TW, Schneider E, Foo T (1992) Selective MR imaging of silicone in breast implants with the three point Dixon technique. Radiology 1985:207–208

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeBruhl ND, Gorczyca DP, Ahn CY, et al. (1993) Silicone breast implants: US evaluation. Radiology 189:95–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS (1988) Improved imaging of the augmented breast. Am J Roentgenol 151:469–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Everson LI, Parantainen H, Detlie T, et al. (1994) Diagnosis of breast implant rupture: imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques. Am J Roentgenol 163:57–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabriel S, O'Fallon M, Kurland L, et al. (1994) Risk of connective-tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 330:1697–1702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganott MA, Harris KM, Ilkhanipour ZS, Costa-Greco MA (1992) Augmentation mammoplasty: normal and abnormal findings with mammography and US. Radiographics 12:281–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorczyca DP (1993) Bilateral surface coils in MR breast imaging: potential hazards [letter]. Radiology 186:906–907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gorczyca DP (1994) MR imaging of breast implants. Radiol Clin North Am 2:659–672

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorczyca DP, De Bruhl ND, Ahn CY, et al. (1994) Silicone breast implant ruptures in an animal model: comparison of mammography, MR imaging, US, and CT. Radiology 190:227–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gorczyca DP, Schneider E, De Bruhl ND, et al. (1994) Silicone breast implant rupture: comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 162:305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gorczyca DP, Sinha S, Ahn CY et al. (1992) Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology 185:407–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris KM, Ganott MA, Shestak KC, et al. (1993) Silicone implant rupture: detection with US. Radiology 187:761–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayes H Jr, Vandergrift J, Diner WC (1988) Mammography and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herzog P, Exner K, Lemperle G, et al. (1989) Sonographische Befunde bei silikoninduzierten Granulomen und Lymphadenopathie nach plastischer Mammachirurgie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 114:1157–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hester TR, Cukic J (1991) Use of stacked polyurethane-covered mammary implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hirmand H, Latrenta GS, Hoffman LA (1993) Autoimmune disease and silicone breast implants. Oncology 7:17–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Josset P, Sitbon E, Wlodarczik B, Nicoletis C (1993) L'histologie de l'environnement péri-prothétique. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 38:763–766

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mund DF, Farria DM, Gorczyca DP, et al. (1993) MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone-gel implants: spectrum of findings. Am J Roentgenol 161:773–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Palcheff-Wiemer M, Concannon MJ, Conn VS, Puckett CL (1993) The impact of the media on women with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:779–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petit JY, Le MG, Mouriesse H, et al. (1994) Can breast reconstruction with gel-filled silicone implants increase the risk of death and second primary cancer in patients treated by mastectomy for breast cancer? Plast Reconstr Surg 94:115–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pétoin S (1993) Les normes de fabrication des protheses mammaires implantables. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 38:680–686

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rosculet KA, Ikeda DM, Forrest ME, et al. (1992) Ruptured gel-filled silicone breast implants: sonographic findings in 19 cases. Am J Roentgenol 159:711–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sitbon E (1993) Le phénomène du sein dur. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 38:767–782

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tristant H, Benmussa M, Bokobsa J, Elbaz P (1991) Complications des prothèses mammaires: les épanchements tardifs intra et périprothétiques. J Le Sein 1:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tristant H, Serin D, Hazebroucq V, et al. (1994) Imagerie des prothèses et plasties mammaires. Paris: Médecine Sciences Flammarion

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tristant, H. Possibilités et limites de l'imagerie pour l'appréciation des implants mammaires. Arch Gynecol Obstet 256 (Suppl 1), S135–S147 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02201948

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02201948

Navigation