Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomical assessment of the bladder outlet and proximal urethra using ultrasound and videocystourethrography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a prospective blinded comparative clinical study 125 women underwent videocystourethrography and cystometry as well as transperineal ultrasound as part of their diagnostic work-up for urinary incontinence or after incontinence-correcting surgery. Comparisons between ultrasound and X-ray imaging were carried out on 117 women for whom complete data sets were available. Mean bladder neck descent was significantly greater with ultrasound compared to VCU (US: 2.1±1.2 cm vs. VCU: 1.8±0.9;P=0.003). Rotation of the proximal urethra was not always seen on X-ray, but when it was (44 patients) there was good correlation with US (US rotation 55±27° vs. VCU rotation 55°±29). There was also good agreement between both tests regarding visualization of funneling or opening of the proximal urethra, with both tests showing equivalent results in 95 out of 117 patients (Cohen's κ 0.58). On comparing extensive funneling to the midurethra on US with frank leakage on VCU the methods were in agreement for 90 out of 117 patients (κ 0.54). Overall a good correlation between ultrasound and radiological findings was observed. Both methods allow anatomic assessment of the bladder neck and have different strengths and weaknesses. Ultrasound imaging may be preferable as it is chaper, requires less technological back-up and avoids the risks of radiation exposure and allergic reactions to contrast medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson JD, Lamensdorf H, Hollander IN et al. Use of transvaginal endosonography in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence.J Urol 1992;147:421–425

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quinn MJ, Beynon J, Mortensen NJ McC et al. Transvaginal endosonography: a new method to study the anatomy of the lower urinary tract in urinary stress incontinence.Br J Urol 1988;62:414–418

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quinn MJ, Beynon J, Mortensen NJ McC et al. Vaginal endosonography in the postoperative assessment of colposuspension.Br J Urol 1989;63:295–300

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mouritsen L, Strandberg C. Vaginal ultrasonography versus colpocystourethrography in the evaluation of female urinary incontinence.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;68:338–342

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergman A, Ballard CA, Platt LD. Ultrasonic evaluation of urethrovesical junction in women with stress incontinence.J Clin Ultrasound 1988;16:295–300

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergman A, McKenzie CJ, Richmond J, Ballard CA, Platt LD. Transrectal ultrasound versus cystography in the evaluation of anatomical stress urinary incontinence.Br J Urol 1988;62:228–234

    Google Scholar 

  7. Braccini G, Pannocchia P, Alderigi L, Gigoni R, Calderazzi A. Comparison of colpocystourethrorectography and transrectal ultrasonography in the assessment of female urinary incontinence.Radiol Med Torino 1991;82:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz HP. Perineal Scan: eine neue Untersuchungsmethode in der Gynaekologie und Geburtshilfe. Thesis, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany, 1989:85–113

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grischke EM, Dietz HP, Jeanty P, Schmidt W. Eine neue Untersuchungsmethode: Perineal Scan in der Gynaekologie und der Geburtshilfe.Ultraschall 1986;7:154–161

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grischke EM. Perinealsonographie.Gynaekol Praxis 1989; 13:473–480

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grischke EM, Anton HW, Dietz HP, Schmidt W. Perinealsonographie und roentgenologische Verfahren im Rahmen der weiblichen Harninkontinenzdiagnostik.Geburtsch Frauenheilk 1989;49:733–736

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kohorn EI, Scioscia AL, Jeanty P, Hobins JC. Ultrasound cystourethrography by perineal scanning for the assessment of female stress urinary incontinence.Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:269–272

    Google Scholar 

  13. Enzelsberger H, Skodler WD, Wolf G, Reinhold E. Comparative study of introital sonography and the urethrocystogram in women before and after surgery for stress incontinence.Ultraschall Med 1991; 12: 149–152

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schaer G, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Simultaneous perineal ultrasound and urodynamic assessment of female urinary incontinence: initial observations.Int Urogynecol J 1995;6:168–174

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schaer GN, Koelbl H, Voigt R et al. Recommendations of the German Association of Urogynecology on functional sonography of the lower female urinary tract.Int Urogynecol J 1996;7:105–108

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bates CP, Corney C. Synchronous cine/pressure/flow cystography: a method of routine urodynamic investigation.Br J Radiol 1971;44:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence.Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:220–224

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schaer G, Kochli OR, Hutzli C, Fink D, Haller U. Value of the lateral urethrocystogram and perineal ultrasound: are there differences? A prospective study.Geburtsch Frauenheilk 1994;54:75–79

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Usefulness of ultrasound contrast medium in perineal sonography for visualization of bladder neck funneling-first observations.Urology 1996;47:452–453

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dietz HP, Ellin KE, Rades T, Wilson PD. The development of an ultrasound contrast medium for incontinence diagnostics.Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16:390–392

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quinn MJ. Vaginal ultrasound and urinary stress incontinence. In: Drife JO, Hilton P, Stanton SL (eds). London: Springer, 1990;129–141

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sacco E, Rigon G, Carbone A et al. Ultrasonographic and urodynamic evaluation in stress incontinence.Minerva Ginecol 1993;45:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gordon D, Pearce M, Norton P, Stanton SL. Comparison of ultrasound and lateral chain urethrocystography in the determination of bladder neck descent.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:182–185

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koelbl H, Bernaschek G, Wolf G. A comparative study of perineal ultrasound scanning and urethrocystography in patients with genuine stress incontinence.Arch Gynecol Obstet 1988;244:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  25. Voigt R, Halaska M, Michels W et al. Examination of the urethrovesical junction using perineal sonography compared to urethrocystography using a bead chain.Int Urogynecol J 1994;5:212–214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, H.P., Wilson, P.D. Anatomical assessment of the bladder outlet and proximal urethra using ultrasound and videocystourethrography. Int Urogynecol J 9, 365–369 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199565

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199565

Keywords

Navigation