Limb movement, intensity of integral afferent impulses from limb receptors, and level of primary afferent terminal polarization during locomotion in cats decerebrated at high level
- 16 Downloads
The relationship between parameters of electrical muscle activity, changes at hindlimb joint angles, intensity of integral afferent flow, and dorsal root potential during real-life locomotion was investigated in cats decerebrated at high level. Characteristics of rear limb movements before and after deafferentation were described. It was found that afferent activity during locomotion motion consists, of two components — a tonic and a periodic phasic stage. Three main waves may be distinguished in the latter, each of which gives rise to associated changes in the level of primary afferent terminal polarization. These changes in turn are summated with the effects produced by the central generator. Correlations, between the parameters of these processes were investigated and the mechanisms underlying afferent control of locomotion generator function discussed.
KeywordsGenerator Function Muscle Activity Dorsal Root Joint Angle Limb Movement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.K. V. Baev, “Depolarization of terminals of different groups of afferent fibers of the lumbar section of the spinal cord during ficitive scratching,” Neirofiziologiya,11, No. 6, 569–577 (1979).Google Scholar
- 2.K. V. Baev, “Polarization, of primary afferent terminals of the lumbar section of the spinal cord during fictive locomotion,” Neirofiziologiya,12, No. 5, 481–489 (1980).Google Scholar
- 3.K. V. Baev and V. B. Esipenko, “Changes in the intensity of integral afferent inflow from limb receptors and in primary afferent terminal polarization during scratching in the decerebrate cat,” Neirofiziologiya,20, No. 1, 49–57 (1988).Google Scholar
- 4.P. P. Gambaryan, G. N. Orlovskii, T. G. Protopopova, et al., “Operation, of muscles during different types of locomotion in the cat and adaptive changes in the organs of movement in the Felidae family,” Tr. Zool. Inst., Akad. Nauk. SSSR,48, No. 2, 220–239 (1971).Google Scholar
- 5.P. P. Gambaryan, Running in Mammals [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1972).Google Scholar
- 6.V. B. Esipenko, “Interconnection between kinematics, of rear limb movement and efferent activity during scratching in the decerebrate cat,” Neirofiziologiya,19, No. 1, 525–533 (1987).Google Scholar
- 7.Yu. P. Shimanskii and K. V. Baev, “Relationship between parameters of efferent activity and limb position during fictive scratching in the decerebrate cat,” Neirofiziologiya,18, No. 5, 636–645 (1986).Google Scholar
- 8.M. L. Shik, F. V. Severin, and G. N. Orlovskii, “Controlling locomotion and running by means of electrical stimulation of the midbrain,” Biofizika,11, No. 4, 659–666 (1966).Google Scholar
- 9.K. V. Baev and P. G. Kostyuk, “Polarization of primary afferent terminals of lumbosacral cord elicited by the activity of spinal locomotor generator,” Neuroscience,7, No. 6, 1401–1409 (1982).Google Scholar
- 10.H. Forssberg, S. Grillner, and S. Rossignol, “Phase dependent reflex reversal during walking in chronic spinal cats,” Brain Res.,85, No. 1, 103–107 (1975).Google Scholar
- 11.G. E. Gaslow, Jr., R. M. Reinking, and D. G. Stuart, “The cat step cycle: hind limb joint angles and muscles lengths during unrestrained locomotion,” J. Morphol.,141, No. 1 1–41 (1973).Google Scholar