Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative relationships for the dependence of growth rate of arable crops on their nitrogen content, dry weight and aerial environment

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Quantitative relationships for growth rate and its dependence on plant nitrogen concentration are developed from the results of experiments on potatoes, cereals and vegetables. The relationships appear to be of general applicability and most coefficients in them are similar for widely different crops.

It is argued that during the main growing period (May–August inclusive) in Western Europe growth of crop dry matter may be limited by self regulatory mechanisms within the plant and is little affected by variations in the aerial environment when there is ample water and nutrients. Under these conditions both growth rate and the critical % N in the dry matter (the minimum % N at which growth rate is maximum) are simple functions of plant dry weight.

It is deduced that when account is taken of the effect of plant weight on % N in the dry matter, growth rate is, as a close approximation, linearly related to % N until this reaches the critical value and constant at higher values.

A computer simulation model based on these relationships enabled estimates to be made of the influence of measured plant-N concentrations on the increase, throughout the season, in the dry weight of potatoes and cereals grown with different levels of N fertilizer. There was good agreement between the estimates made in this way and the results of numerous field experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrol Y P 1986 Nitrogen redistribution and its loss in wheat.In Fundamental, Ecological and Agricultural Aspects of Nitrogen Metabolism in Higher Plants. Eds. H. Lambers, J J Neeteson and I Stulen. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht. pp 399–401.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biscoe P V, Scott R K and Monteith J L 1975 Barley and its environment III Carbon budget of the stand. J. Appl. Ecol. 12, 269–293.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broeshart H and Van Schouwenburg J Ch 1961 Early diagnosis of mineral deficiencies by means of plants analysis. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 9, 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown R H 1978 A difference in N use efficiency in C3 and C4 plants and its implications in adaptation and evolution. Crop Science, 18, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cook M G and Evans L T 1983 Some physiological aspects of the domestication and improvement of rice (Oryza spp.). Field Crops Res. 6, 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper J P 1975 Control of photosynthetic production in terrestrial systems.In Photosynthesis and Productivity in different Environments. Ed. J P Cooper. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp 593–621.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Costigan P A 1985 A survey of nutrient concentrations and early shoot and root growth of drilled lettuce in 21 commercial sowings in one year. J. Hortic. Sci. 60, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeJong T M 1982 Leaf nitrogen content and CO2 assimilation capacity in peach. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107, 955–959.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeJong T M 1986 Distribution of leaf nitrogen concentration in relation to leaf light exposure in peach (Prunus persica) tree canopies.In Fundamental, Ecological and Agricultural Aspects of Nitrogen Metabolism in Higher Plants. Eds. H. Lambers, J J Neetseon and I Stulen. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht. pp 319–321.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyson P W and Watson D J 1971 An analysis of the effects of nutrient supply on the growth of the potato crops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 69 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  11. French R J and Schultz J E 1984 Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. 1 The relation between yield, water use and climate. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 35, 743–764.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gallagher J N and Biscoe P V 1978 Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 91, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gray D and Morris G E L 1978 Seasonal effects on the growth and time to maturity of lettuce. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 91, 523–529.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenwood D J 1981 Fertilizer use and food production: world scene. Fertilizer Research. 2, 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greenwood D J 1985 Prediction of nitrogen fertilizer needs of arable crops. Advances in Plant Nutrition, 2.In press.

  16. Greenwood D J, Barnes A, Liu K, Hunt J, Cleaver T J and Loquens S M H 1980 Relationships between the critical concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in 17 different vegetable crops and duration of growth. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 31, 1343–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenwood D J, Cleaver T J, Loquens S M H and Niendorf K B 1977 Relationship between plant weight and growing period for vegetable crops in the United Kingdom. Ann. Bot. 41, 987–997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Greenwood D J, Cleaver T J, Turner M K, Hunt J, Niendorf K B and Loquens S M H 1980 Comparison of the effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield, nitrogen content and quality of 21 different vegetable and agricultural crops. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 95, 471–485.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenwood D J, Neeteson J J and Draycott A 1985 Response of potatoes to N fertilizer; Quantitative relations for components of growth. Plant and Soil 85, 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gregory P J, Marshall B and Biscoe P V 1981 Nutrient relations of winter wheat 3. Nitrogen uptake, photosynthesis of flag leaves and translocation of nitrogen to grain. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 96, 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halse N J, Greenwood E A N, Lapins P and Boundy C A P 1969 An analysis of the effects of nitrogen deficiency on the growth and yield of a Western Australian wheat crop. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 20, 987–998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hawkins R C and Cooper P J M 1981 Growth development and grain yield of maize. Expl. Agric. 17, 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hood A E M 1982 Fertilizer trends in relation to biological productivity within the UK. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, 296B, 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huffaker R C 1981 Biochemistry of leaf proteins.In Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology 14A Nucleic acids and proteins in plants. 1. Proteins. Eds. D Boulter and B Partheir. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 370–400.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ishihara K, Iida O, Hirasawa T and Ogura T 1979 Relationship between nitrogen content in leaf blades and photosynthetic rate of rice plants with reference to stomatal aperture and conductance. Japan Crop Sci. 48, 543–550.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ishihara K, Kuroda E, Ishi R and Ogura T 1979 Relationship between nitrogen content in leaf blades and photosynthetic rate in rice plants measured with an infrared gas analyzer and an oxygen electrode. Japan Crop Sci. 48 551–556.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leach J E 1980 Photosynthesis and growth of spring barley: some effects of drought. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 94, 623–635.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Legg B J, Day W, Lawlor D W and Parkinson K J 1979 The effects of drought on barley growth models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 92, 703–716.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCree K J 1982 Maintenance requirements of white clover a high and low growth rates. Crop Sci. 22, 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Milford G F J, Biscoe P V, Jaggard K W, Scott R K and Draycott A P 1980 Physiological potential for increasing yields of sugar beet.In Opportunities for increasing crop yields. Eds. R G Hurd, P V Biscoe, C Dennis, Pitman, London, pp 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Monteith J L 1977 Climate.In Ecophysiology of tropical crops. Eds. P de T Alvim and T T Kozlowski. Academic Press, London. pp 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Monteith J L 1981 Does light limit crop production.In Physiological processes limiting plant productivity. Ed. C B Johnson. Butterworths, London. pp 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moorby J 1977 Integration and regulation of translocation within the whole plant.In Integration of activity in the higher plant. Ed. D H Jennings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp 425–454.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moorby J 1978 The physiology of growth and tuber yield.In The Potato Crop. The scientific basis for improvement. Ed. P M Harris. Chapman and Hall, London. pp 153–194.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Natr L 1975 Influence of mineral nutrition of photosynthesis and the use of assimilates.In Photosynthesis and Productivity in Different Environments. Ed. J P Cooper. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp 537–555.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ris J 1969 IB-Werkgroep Invloed van het weer op de bodemvruchtbaarheid (project 139). Eerste mededeling. Tussentijdse samenvattende bewerking van waarnemingen in de eerste zeven proefjaren (1961 t/m 1967). Inst. Soil Fertility, Haren, The Netherlands. Rapport 10–69.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Siman G 1974 Nitrogen status in growing cereals with special attention to the use of plant analysis as a guide to supplemental fertilization. Royal Agricultural College. Uppsala. 93 p.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Spratt E D and Gasser J K R 1976 Effects of fertilizer-N and water supply on distribution of dry matter and nitrogen between the different parts of wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50, 613–625.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stoddart J L and Thomas H 1981 Leaf senescence.In Nucleic Acids and Proteins in Plants. Structure Biochemistry and Physiology of Proteins, Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology. New Series Volume 14A. Eds. D Boulter and B Parthier. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp 529–636.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tinker P B and Widdowson F V 1982 Maximizing wheat yields and some causes of yield variation. Proc. Fert. Soc. 211, 149–184.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Trewavas A 1981 How do plant growth substances work. Plant Cell Environment 4, 203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Van Keulen H, Louwerse W, Sibma L and Alberda Th 1975 Crop simulation and experimental evaluation — a case study.In Photosynthesis and Productivity in Different Environments. Ed. J P Cooper. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp 623–643.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wareing P F, Khalifa M M and Treharne K J 1968 Rate-limiting process in photosynthesis at saturating light intensities. Nature, London. 220, 453–457.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Watson D J 1947 Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. 1. Variation — in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties and between years. Ann. Bot. 11, 41–76.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Welbank P J, Gibb M J, Taylor P J and Williams E D 1974 Root growth of cereal crop. Ann. Rep. Rothamsted Exp. Stn. 1973 Part 2, pp 26–66.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Weir A H, Braggs P L, Porter J R and Rayner J H 1984 A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 102, 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  47. de Wit C T 1958 Transpiration and crop yields. Versl. Landbouwk Onderz. No. 64.6, 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  48. de Wit C T, Goudriaan J, van Laar H H, Penning de Vries F W T, Rabbinge R, van Keulen H, Louwerse W, Sibma L and Jonge C de 1978 Simulation of assimilation, respiration and transpiration of crops. Pudoc. Wageningen. 141 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenwood, D.J., Neeteson, J.J. & Draycott, A. Quantitative relationships for the dependence of growth rate of arable crops on their nitrogen content, dry weight and aerial environment. Plant Soil 91, 281–301 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198111

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198111

Key words

Navigation