Abstract
Justice is an increasingly important concept to examine with regard to decisions about environmental conflicts. But justice can be defined in a number of ways. This paper argues that the perceived importance of different principles of justice to environmental decisions is affected by the position argued, by contextual manipulations, and by individual difference variables. Literature is reviewed in support of the first of these points, suggesting that environmentalism is more congenial than antienvironmentalism to macrojustice principles. Data are presented to show that the way in which a conflict is described, in general or specific terms, affects the perceived importance of some justice principles, and that subject gender and environmental ideology are also related.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berry, W. (1981).The Gift of Good Land, North Point, San Francisco.
Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., and Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 173–202.
Bullard, R. (1990).Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality, Westview, Boulder, CO.
Clayton, S. (1994). Appeals to justice in the environmental debate.J. Soc. Issues 50(3): 13–27.
Clayton, S. (1996). What is fair in the environmental debate. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. (eds.),Current Societal Concerns About Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
Cvetkovich, G., and Earle T. (1994). The construction of justice: A case study of public participation in land management.J. Soc. Issues 50(3): 161–178.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues 31(3): 137–149.
Foreman, D. (1991).Confessions of an Eco-Warrior, Harmony Books, New York.
Leopold, A. (1987).A Sand County Almanac, Oxford University Press, New York (Original work published 1949)
Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction.J. Soc. Issues 31(3): 1–19.
Major, B., and Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 43–76.
Martin, J., and Harder, J. (1991, July). Bread and roses: Justice and the distribution of financial and socio-emotional rewards in organizations. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Justice Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Merchant, C. (1980).The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, Harper Collins, New York.
Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An overview.J. Soc. Issues 46(1): 20.
Prentice, D. A., and Crosby, F. J. (1987). The importance of context for assessing deservingness. In Masters, J. C., and Smith, W. P. (eds.)Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 165–182.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. (1975). Who believes in a just world?J. Soc. Issues 31(3): 73–93.
Sinclair, R. C., and Mark, M. M. (1991). Mood and the endorsement of egalitarian macrojustice vs. equity-based microjustice.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17 369–375.
Stern, P., and Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern.J. Soc. Issues 50(3): 65–84.
Syme, G., and Nancarrow, B. (1992).Perceptions of faimess and social justice in the allocation of water resources in Australia, CSIRO Consultancy Report No. 92/38, Perth, Australia.
Thompson, S. G., and Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment.J. Environ. Psychol. 14: 149–157.
Tyler, T. (1987). Procedural justice research.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 41–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clayton, S. What is valued in resolving environmental dilemmas: Individual and contextual influences. Soc Just Res 9, 171–184 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198078
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198078