Skip to main content
Log in

What is valued in resolving environmental dilemmas: Individual and contextual influences

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Justice is an increasingly important concept to examine with regard to decisions about environmental conflicts. But justice can be defined in a number of ways. This paper argues that the perceived importance of different principles of justice to environmental decisions is affected by the position argued, by contextual manipulations, and by individual difference variables. Literature is reviewed in support of the first of these points, suggesting that environmentalism is more congenial than antienvironmentalism to macrojustice principles. Data are presented to show that the way in which a conflict is described, in general or specific terms, affects the perceived importance of some justice principles, and that subject gender and environmental ideology are also related.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, W. (1981).The Gift of Good Land, North Point, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., and Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. (1990).Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality, Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S. (1994). Appeals to justice in the environmental debate.J. Soc. Issues 50(3): 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S. (1996). What is fair in the environmental debate. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. (eds.),Current Societal Concerns About Justice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, G., and Earle T. (1994). The construction of justice: A case study of public participation in land management.J. Soc. Issues 50(3): 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues 31(3): 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, D. (1991).Confessions of an Eco-Warrior, Harmony Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1987).A Sand County Almanac, Oxford University Press, New York (Original work published 1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction.J. Soc. Issues 31(3): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., and Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., and Harder, J. (1991, July). Bread and roses: Justice and the distribution of financial and socio-emotional rewards in organizations. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Justice Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

  • Merchant, C. (1980).The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, Harper Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An overview.J. Soc. Issues 46(1): 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., and Crosby, F. J. (1987). The importance of context for assessing deservingness. In Masters, J. C., and Smith, W. P. (eds.)Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. (1975). Who believes in a just world?J. Soc. Issues 31(3): 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, R. C., and Mark, M. M. (1991). Mood and the endorsement of egalitarian macrojustice vs. equity-based microjustice.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P., and Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern.J. Soc. Issues 50(3): 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, G., and Nancarrow, B. (1992).Perceptions of faimess and social justice in the allocation of water resources in Australia, CSIRO Consultancy Report No. 92/38, Perth, Australia.

  • Thompson, S. G., and Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment.J. Environ. Psychol. 14: 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (1987). Procedural justice research.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clayton, S. What is valued in resolving environmental dilemmas: Individual and contextual influences. Soc Just Res 9, 171–184 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198078

Key Words

Navigation