Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal variations in the spatial distribution of root tips in teak (Tectonia grandis Linn. f.) plantations in the Varanasi Forest Division, India

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Seasonal variations in the spatial distribution of root tips were studied in 19 and 29 year old teak plantations, located on red and alluvial soils respectively. The pattern was essentially similar at both sites, but generally the alluvial soil site exhibited a greater number of root tips. Root tips decreased with increasing distance from the tree base. Through-out most of the year the relative distribution of root tips decreased with depth; the difference between 0–10 and 10–20 cm depths was marginal, but 20–40 cm depth contained distinctly fewer root tips. At all distances a similar seasonal trend was noticed, a mid rainy season peak being followed by a steady decline until the dry summer except for an abrupt rise to a smaller peak in February after the winter rains.

The root tip density was positively correlated with the ≤2 mm root biomass and both showed a similar bimodal annual cycle. Of three environmental variables studied, soil moisture and rainfall were significantly positively correlated with root tip densityl the relationship between soil temperature and root tip density was negative and non-significant. The combined effect of soil moisture and temperature on root tip density, evaluated by a multiple regression model, accounted for 80–95% of the variation in root tip density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Böhm W 1979 Methods of studying root systems. Ecological studies 33, 188 p., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daubenmire R F 1947 Plants and Environment. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, London, Sydney and Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farrel E P and Leaf A L 1974 Effects of fertilization and irrigation on root numbers in a red pine plantation. Can. J. For. Res. 4, 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ford E D and Deans J D 1977 Growth of a Sitka Spruce plantation: Spatial distribution and seasonal fluctuations of lengths, weight and carbohydrate concentrations of fine roots. Plant and Soil 47, 463–485.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harris W F, Kinerson R S and Edwards N T 1977 Comparison of belowground biomass in natural deciduous forests and loblolly pine plantations. Pedobiologia 17, 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson M L 1958 Soil Chemical Analysis. 488 p. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen P and Pettersson S 1977 Effects of some internal and environmental factors on ion uptake efficiency in roots of pine seedlings. Swed. Conif. For. Proj. Tech. Rep. 6, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kimmins J P and Hawkes B C 1978 Distribution and chemistry of fine roots in British Columbia: implication for management. Can. J. For. Res. 8, 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolesnikow V A 1968 Cyclic renewal of roots on fruit plants.In Methods of Productivity Studies in Root Systems and Rhizosphere Organisms. Eds M S Ghilarovet al. Nauka, Leningrad, 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kolesnikow V A 1971 The Root Systems lf Fruit Plants. Mir Publishers, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kummerow J, Kummerow M and Souza Da Silva W 1982 Fine-root growth dynamics in cacao (Theobroma cacao). Plant and Soil 65, 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lyford W H 1980 Development of the root system of Northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.). Harvard Forest Paper No. 21, pp. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McQueen D R 1968 The quantitative distribution of absorbing roots ofPinus silvestris andFagus sylvestica in a forest succession. Oecol. Plant 3,83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer von F H 1967 Feinwurzelverteilung bei Waldbaumen in Abhangigkeit vom Substrat. Rorstarch. 38, 286–290.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer F H and Gottsche D 1971 Distribution of root tips and tender roots of beech.In Ecological Studies. Analysis and Synthesis, Vol. 2. Ed. H. Ellenberg. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Persson H 1978 Root dynamics in a young scots pine stand in central Sweden. Oikos 30, 508–519.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Persson H 1980 Spatial distribution of fine-root growth, mortality and decomposition in a young scots pine stand in Central Sweden. Oikos 34, 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Piper C S 1942 Soil and Plant Analysis. Interscience Publ. Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds E R C 1970 Root distribution and the cause of its spatial variability inPseudotsuga taxifolia (Poir.) Britt. Plant and Soil 32, 501–517.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts J 1976 A study of root distribution and grwoth in aPinus sylvestris L. (scots Pine) plantation in East Anglia. Plant and Soil 44, 607–621.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh K P and Singh R P 1981 Seasonal variation in biomass and energy of small roots in tropical dry deciduous forest, Varanasi, India, Oikos 37, 88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh K P and Srivastava S K 1984 Spatial distribution of fine root mass in young teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) trees of varying girth sizes. Pedobiologia 27, 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sutton R F 1969 Form and development of conifer root systems. Tech. Commun. 7. Commonw. For. Bur. Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, K.P., Srivastava, S.K. Seasonal variations in the spatial distribution of root tips in teak (Tectonia grandis Linn. f.) plantations in the Varanasi Forest Division, India. Plant Soil 84, 93–104 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197870

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197870

Key words

Navigation