Plant and Soil

, Volume 109, Issue 1, pp 79–83 | Cite as

Long term delayed luminescence: A possible fast and convenient assay for nutrition deficiencies and environmental pollution damages in plants

  • Joachim Bürger
  • Werner Schmidt
Article

Abstract

Long Term Delayed Luminescence (LDL) of green plants ranging from 0.3 s up to several minutes after irradiation has been found to exhibit complex decay kinetics which are highly dependent on nutritional deficiencies and environmental pollutive components. As a model organism we utilized the unicellular green algaScenedesmus obliquus with fairly well understood properties ofLDL probably involving both photosynthetic reaction centers PS I and PS II. It is shown thatLDL is strongly affected both by depletion of the growth medium of various essential elements such as N, Fe, Ca, Mg or K, as well as by growth in the presence of environmental stress factors such as Cu, Hg, Cd or NO 2 . Therefore,LDL offers itself as a convenient, highly sensitive and specific assay for a number of stress factors in photosynthesizing plantsin vivo and in the field.

Key words

delayed fluorescence delayed luminescence (long term) nutrient deficiency pollutants (environmental) Scenedesmus obliquus spectrophotometryin vivo detection of ultra weak light 

Abbreviations

PS I, PS II

photosystem I or II

Chl a

chlorophyll a

LDL

long term delayed luminescence, including two components termed LDL1 and LDL2

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amesz J and Gorkom H J v 1978 Delayed fluorescence in photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29, 47–66.Google Scholar
  2. Bazzas F A, Rolfe G L and Carlson R W 1974 Effect of Cd on photosynthesis and transpiration of excised leaves of corn and sunflower. Plant Physiol. 32, 373–376.Google Scholar
  3. Björn L O 1971 Far-red induced, long-lived afterglow from photosynthetic cells. Size of afterglow unit and paths of energy accumulation and dissipation. Photochem. Photobiol. 13, 5–20.Google Scholar
  4. Butjas C and Cseh E 1981 Effect of heavy metals and chelating agents on potassium uptake of cereal roots. Plant and Soil 63, 97–100.Google Scholar
  5. Clayton R 1969 Characteristics of prompt and delayed fluorescence from spinach chloroplasts. Biophys. J. 9, 60–76.Google Scholar
  6. Goedheer J C 1963 A cooperation of two pigment systems and respiration in photosynthetic luminescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 66, 61–71.Google Scholar
  7. Jennet J C, Bolter E, Gale N, Tranter W and Hardie M 1974 The Viburnum Trend, Southeast Missouri: the largest lead mining district in the world—environmental effects and controls.In Intern. Symp. on minerals and the environment. Institution of mining and metallurgy, London.Google Scholar
  8. Kimimura M and Kato S 1972 Studies on electron transport associated with photosystem I. I. Functional site of plastocyanin; inhibitory effects of HgCl2 on electron transport and plastocyanin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 283, 279–292.Google Scholar
  9. Kratz W A and Myers J 1955 Nutrition and growth of several blue-green algae. Am. J. Bot. 42, 282–287.Google Scholar
  10. Lavorel J 1975 Luminescence.In Bioenergetics of Photosynthesis Ed. R Govindjee, pp 223–317. Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London.Google Scholar
  11. Malkin S 1977 Delayed Luminescence.In Primary Processes of Photosynthesis. Ed. J. Barber, pp 349–431, North Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ökotest Magazin 1986 Kommunale Abwasser-Satzungen, Grenzwerte für Schadstoffeinleitungen der Länderarbeits-gemeinschaft Wasser (LAWA), 9, 36–41.Google Scholar
  13. Sane P V, Desai T S and Tatake V G 1980 Luminescence from photosystem I at high temperatures. Z. Naturforsch. 35c, 289–292.Google Scholar
  14. Schmidt W 1985 Prompt and delayed fluorescence in mature tobacco leaves: a spectral comparison. Photobiochem. Photobiophys. 9, 89–97.Google Scholar
  15. Schmidt W and Senger H 1987a Long-term delayed luminescence inScenedesmus obliquus I. Spectral and kinetic properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 890, 15–22.Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt W and Senger H 1987b Long-term delayed luminescence inScenedesmus obliquus II. Influence of exogeneous factors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 891, 22–27.Google Scholar
  17. Senger H and Bishop N I 1972 Changes in fluorescence and absorbance during synchronous growth of Scenedesmus.In Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. on Photosynthesis Res., Vol. 1, Eds. G. Fortiet al., pp 678–687, W. Junk, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Strehler B L and Arnold W 1951 Light production by green plants. J. Gen. Physiol. 34, 809–820.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Bürger
    • 1
  • Werner Schmidt
    • 2
  1. 1.Fachbereich Biologie Botanik der Philipps-Universität MarburgMarburg/Lahn, LahnbergeFRG
  2. 2.Fakultät für BiologieUniversität KonstanzKonstanz 1FRG

Personalised recommendations