Abstract
This study examines admission decisions at a highly selective private university. A statistical analysis of 300 admission decisions is used to compare admissions officers' beliefs about how the admissions process works with their actual pattern of decisions. As a group, the officers underestimate the effect of applicant race, gender, alumni status, and athletic ability on their academic and personality ratings and final admission decisions. Individual officers place different weights on the decision-making criteria, with the model explaining less variation in the ratings of officers with more years of experience. The comparison of beliefs with practice has implications for evaluating the distributive and procedural fairness of the college admissions process.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Abelson, R., and Levy, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E. (eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., Random House, New York, pp. 231–309.
Bazerman, M. (1985). Norms of distributive justice in interest arbitration.Ind. Labor Rel. Rev. 38, 558–570.
Clayton, S., and Crosby, F. (1992).Justice, Gender, and Affirmative Action, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Conley, P. (1995a). The allocation of college admissions. In Elster, J. (ed.),Local Justice in America, Russell Sage, New York, pp. 16–53.
Conley, P. (1995b). Local justice in the allocation of college admissions. Paper presented at fifth international conference on social justice research, Reno, Nevada, June 26–29.
Coons, J. E. (1987). Consistency.Cal. Law Rew. 75, 59–113.
Dawes, R. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of decision making.Am. Psychol. 26, 180–188.
Dawes, R., and Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making.Psychol. Bull. 81, 95–109.
Einhorn, H. (1970). The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making.Psychol. Bull. 73, 221–230.
Einhorn, H. (1971). Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information.Org. Behav. Hum. Perf. 6, 1–27.
Elster, J. (1992).Local Justice, Russell Sage, New York.
Elster, J. (ed.) (1995).Local Justice in America, Russell Sage, New York.
Hoffman, P. (1960). The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment.Psychol. Bull. 57, 116–131.
Klitgaard, R. (1985).Choosing Elites, Basic Books, New York.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
Mellers, B., and Hartka, E. (1988). Fair selection decisions.J. Exp. Psychol. 14, 572–581.
Ross, S. D., Pinzler, I., Ellis, D., and Moss, K. (1993).The Rights of Women, 3rd ed., Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
Schmidt, V. (1994). Bounded justice.Soc. Sci. Inf. 33, 305–333.
Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment.Org. Behav. Hum. Perf. 6, 649–764.
Tyler, T. (1990).Why People Obey the Law, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conley, P. Local justice in the allocation of college admissions: A statistical study of beliefs versus practice. Soc Just Res 9, 239–258 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197250
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197250
Key Words
- college admission
- consistency
- discretion
- justice
- judgment