Skip to main content
Log in

Primary and secondary reflection in existential family therapy

  • Clinical Issues
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author uses Gabriel Marcel's topology of primary and secondary thought to clarify and outline the process of reflection in Existential Family Therapy. Clinical material is used to illustrate the differences between primary and secondary reflection during the practice of Existential Family Therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, E. (1974).The emotionally disturbed family. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1958).I and thou. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1955).The doctor and the soul. New York: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1959).Man's search for meaning. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1967).Psychotherapy and existentialism. New York, Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1969).The will to meaning. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1975).The unconscious god. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1978).The unheard cry for meaning. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1985).The healing dialogue in psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, I., & Kessler, D. (1974).Marital and family therapy. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, D., & Haley, J. (1993).Conversations on therapy. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1974).Problem solving therapy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1974). Existential treatment and the Vietnam veteran family. InOhio Department of Mental Health Yearly Report (pp. 33–36). Columbus: Ohio Department of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1978).Family and marital therapy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1979). Extreme itching treated by a family systems approach.International Journal of Family Therapy, 1, 244–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1982). Dereflection in family therapy with schizophrenic clients.International Forum of Logotherapy, 5, 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1985). Never trust a family therapist who is younger than forty.Voices, 21, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1986). Family logotherapy.Contemporary Family Therapy, 8, 124–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1987). Franklian family therapy.International Forum of Logotherapy, 10, 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1989). Family logotherapy with an overweight family.Contemporary Family Therapy, 11, 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1990). Existential reflection in marital therapy with Vietnam veterans.Journal of Couples Therapy, 1, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1991). Franklian treatment with Vietnam veteran couples.Journal of Religion and Health, 30, 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1992). Meaning, nerves and the urban-Appalachian family.Journal of Religion and Health, 31, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1993).Existential family therapy: Using the concepts of Viktor Frankl. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J. (1994). Mystery in Family Therapy.Contemporary Family Therapy, 16, 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J., & Harper, K. (1990). Anomic depression and the migrating family.Contemporary Family Therapy, 12, 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, J., & Lantz, J. (1991). Franklian treatment with the traumatized family.Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 2, 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, G. (1949).Mystery of being: Reflection and mystery. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, G. (1950).Mystery of being: Faith and reality. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, G. (1951).Homo viator, Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, G. (1956).The philosophy of existentialism. New York: The Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, G. (1962).Man against mass society. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, G. (1963).The existential background of human dignity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, G. (1967).Being and having. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, H., & Sangiulanno, I. (1964).The therapist's contribution to the treatment process. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1967).Conjoint family therapy. Palo Alto: Science & Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (1954).Nature of sympathy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles, H. (1958). The schizophrenic's vulnerability to the therapist's unconscious processes,Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 127, 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usandivaras, R., Grimson, W., Hammond, H., Issaharoff, E., & Romanos, D. (1967). The marbles test.Archives of General Psychiatry, 17, 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (1966). A structured family interview.Family Process, 5, 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lantz, J. Primary and secondary reflection in existential family therapy. Contemp Fam Ther 16, 315–327 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196883

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196883

Key words

Navigation