Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 129–146 | Cite as

The personal well-being of single-parent family heads rearing their children by themselves: A comparative study

  • Orna Cohen
Family Therapy in Israel Family Research with Clinical Implications

Abstract

This article summarizes a study comparing the sense of well-being of divorced maternal and paternal single parents rearing their children by themselves with that of two-parent family heads. There were differences between the family's sense of well-being only in terms of the two extremes of their economic situation. In a good economic situation, single-parent families have a higher sense of well-being than the two-parent families; in a poor economic situation, the reverse is true. When the economic situation is average, their sense of well-being is similar. The concept of an androgynous sex role and a croblem-focused coping style (in that order) were important. Recommendations for other studies and directions for future thought about therapy procedures are included.

Key Words

single-parent families personal well-being Israel childrearing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahrons, C. R. (1980). Divorce: a crisis of family transition and change.Family Relations, 29, 533–540.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976)Social indication of well-being: Americans' perception of life quality. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  3. Arkelin, D., & Simmons, R. (1985). The “good manager”: Sex typed, androgynous or likeable?Sex Roles, 12, 1183–1199.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155, 162.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, W. H. (1985). Continued attachment after legal divorce.Journal of Family Issues, 6, 375–392.Google Scholar
  6. Bradburn, N. (1969).The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Coan, R. W. (1977),Hero, artist, sage or saint. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, O. (1992).The single-parent family: Concept of sex role, ways of coping and sense of well-being of divorced fathers and mothers raising their children themselves. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel. (Habrew)Google Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1984). Personality as a life-long determinant of well being. In C. Malatesta, & C. Izard (Eds.)Affective processes in adult development and aging. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Deiner, E. (1984). Subjective well-being.Psychological Bulletin, 95, 245–275.Google Scholar
  11. Donovan, R. L., & Jackson, B. L. (1990). Deciding to divorce: A process guided by social exchange, attachment and cognitive dissonance theories.Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 13, 23–35.Google Scholar
  12. Dreman, S. O., & Aldor, R. (1989). Competence of dissonance: Divorcing mothers' perceptions of sense of competence and time perspective.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 405–415.Google Scholar
  13. Festinger, L. (1957).A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fishel, A. H., & Scanzoni, J. (1989). An exploratory study of the post-divorce coparental relationship.Journal of Divorce 13, 95–119.Google Scholar
  15. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170.Google Scholar
  16. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in middle-aged community samples.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21 219–239.Google Scholar
  17. Haring-Hodire, M., Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., & Witter, R. A. (1985). Marital status and subjective well-being: A research synthesis.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 947–953.Google Scholar
  18. Kaslow, F. W., & Schwartz, L. (1987).The dynamics of divorce: A life cycle perspective. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  19. O'Heron, C. A., & Orlofsky, J. L. (1990). Stereotypic and non-stereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientation, gender identity, and adjustment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 134–143.Google Scholar
  20. Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types and clinical applications.Family Process, 18, 3–28.Google Scholar
  21. Pennebaker, J. W., Colder, M., & Sharp, K. (1990). Accelerating the coping process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 528–537.Google Scholar
  22. Schlosser, B. (1990). The assessment of subjective well being and its relationship to the stress process.Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 128–140.Google Scholar
  23. Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life.Social Indicators Research, 5, 475–492.Google Scholar
  24. Teichman, J. D. (1990). Socioeconomic resources of parents and award of child support in the United States: Some exploratory models.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 689–699.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, L., & Spanier, G. B. (1983). The end of marriage and the acceptance of marital separation.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 103–114.Google Scholar
  26. Weitzman, L. J. (1985).The divorce revolution: The unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orna Cohen
    • 1
  1. 1.The Bob Shapell School of Social WorkTel-Aviv UniversityRamat AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations