Skip to main content
Log in

Factors influencing the probability of employee promotions: A comparative analysis of human capital, organization screening and gender/race discrimination theories

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the effects that a manager's formal education, on-the-job training, race and gender had on the probability of being promoted from different jobs during his or her career in a company. Having a bachelor's degree with a major in business or engineering had significant screening effects on the probability of being promoted. The education screening was much stronger for low performing managers than for high performers. There was no evidence of gender or race or race discrimination effects. The importance of determining screening variables is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beehr, T., Taber, T.D., & Walsh, J.T., (1980). Perceived mobility channels: Criteria for intra-organizational mobility.Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 26, 250–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. (1972). Regressions models and life tables.Journal of Royal Statistical Society, B(34), 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P., & Piore, M. (1971).Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: Heath-Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, F.E. (1990).Survival and Risk Analysis. American Statistical Association Continuing Education Program, Durham, NC: Duke University Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintze, J.L. (1989).SOLO Statistical system: Version 3.0 Survival Analysis [Computer program]. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, W.T., Harlan, S.L., & Hackett, E.J. (1987). Promotion opportunity in organizations: Causes and consequences. In K.M. Rowland and G.R. Ferris (Eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (pp. 223–287). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L.H., & Sheridan, J.E. (1988). Turnover research methodology: A critique of traditional designs and a suggested survival model alternative. In K.M. Rowland & G.R. Ferris (Eds.),Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 6). (pp. 231–262). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J.E. (1984).Career Mobility in a Corporate Hierarchy. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, J.E., Slocum, J.W., Jr., Buda, R., & Thompson, R. (1990). Effects of corporate sponsorship and departmental power on career tournaments.Academy of Management Journal, 33, 578–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, M.H. (1990). Human capital theory: Implications for HR managers.Industrial Relations, 29(2), 214–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L.C. (1972). Education and economic equality.The Public Interest, 28, 66–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Support for this research was provided by the participating company and the Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University. The authors acknowledge the helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript by Professors Joan Brett, Jack Brittain, Ellen Jackofsky, Barbara Lawrence, and Robin Pinkley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheridan, J.E., Slocum, J.W. & Buda, R. Factors influencing the probability of employee promotions: A comparative analysis of human capital, organization screening and gender/race discrimination theories. J Bus Psychol 11, 373–380 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02195900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02195900

Keywords

Navigation