Conclusion
It may appear that this paper poses a dilemma for an existing institution dependent for support upon other institutions, among which many of the most powerful are dedicated to the maintenance of privilege rather than to the equalization of educational opportunity. In major part this charge must be admitted. Nevertheless, there are in every institution degrees of freedom. Many individuals, occupying key roles in all of the most powerful institutions in the world, are deeply ambivalent. They recognize that the present struggle for power and privilege cannot long continue its present course and even that any such continuance is fraught with grave dangers for mankind.
Furthermore, the ideologies which most institutions propound already express the values which these institutions subvert in operation, and the proclamation of these ideologies is not wholly hypocritical. There is room for manoeuvre, therefore, and while not everything is possible, much can be done to free educational resources from their present shackles, and even to use them in weakening these shackles further.
Similar content being viewed by others
Additional information
Everett Reimer(born in the United States). Director of the Alternatives in Education Programme at the Centro Intercultural de Documentación (CIDOC), Cuernavaca, Mexico. Former consultant to the Secretariat of Education in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Author of An Essay on Alternatives in Education (with Ivan Illich) and other publications.
This article was written for a series of studies prepared for the International Commission on the Development of Education, at Unesco.
About this article
Cite this article
Reimer, E. Freeing educational resources. Prospects 2, 48–58 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02195652
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02195652