Advertisement

Prospects

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 289–298 | Cite as

Politics of knowledge, models of development and literacy

  • Pramod Parajuli
Viewpoints/Controversies

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altbach, P. 1987.The Knowledge Context: Comparative Perspectives on Distribution of Knowledge, Albany, N.Y., State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arnove, R. 1980.Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad. Boston, Mass., G. K. Hall & Co.Google Scholar
  3. Bahuguna, S. 1988. Chipko: The People's Movement with a Hope for the Survival of Mankind.IFDA Dossier 63, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  4. Bandyopadhyay, J.;Shiva, V. 1988. Political Economy of Ecology Movements.Economic and Political Weekly, 11 June, pp. 1223–32.Google Scholar
  5. Carnoy, M. 1984.The State and the Political Theory. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dharampal, A. 1971.Indian Science and Technology in the Eighteenth Century. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  7. Dharampal, A.. 1984.The Beautiful Tree. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  8. Ellsworth, E. 1989. Why Does This Not Feel Empowering? Working Through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy.Harvard Education Review, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 297–324.Google Scholar
  9. Esteva, G. 1987. Regenerating Peoples' Space.Alternatives, Vol. XII, No. 1, pp. 125–52.Google Scholar
  10. Fals-Borda, O. 1985.Knowledge and People's Power. New Delhi, Indian Social Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Fortman, L.; Fairfax, S. 1989. American Forestry Professionalism in the Third World.Economic and Political Weekly, 12 August.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. 1980.Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings (1972–1977). New York, Pantheon.Google Scholar
  13. Franco, J. 1988. Beyond Ethnocentrism: Gender, Power and the Third World Intelligentsia. In: C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds.),Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, pp. 503–18. Chicago, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  14. Freire, P. 1972.Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London, Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1985.The Politics of Education. Culture, Power and Liberation. S. Hadley, Mass., Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  16. George, S. 1988.The Fate Worse Than Debt: The World Financial Crisis and the Poor. New York, Grove Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gramsci, A. 1971.Prison Notebooks. New York, International Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1985.Selections from Cultural Writings. (Trans. by William Boelhower.) Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Guha, R. C. 1988. The Alternative Science Movement: An Interim Assessment.Lokayan Bulletin, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 7–25.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, B. 1984. Research, Commitment and Action: The Role of Participatory Research.International Review of Education.Google Scholar
  21. Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 575–99.Google Scholar
  22. Mouffe, C. 1988. Hegemony and New Political Subjects: Toward a New Concept of Democracy. In: C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds.),Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, pp. 89–104. Chicago, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nandy, A. 1987.Traditions, Tyranny and Utopia. New Delhi, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nun, J. 1986. Elements for a Theory of Democracy: Gramsci and Common Sense.Boundary, Vol. II, pp. 197–230.Google Scholar
  25. Omvedt, G. 1987. India's Green Movements.Race and Class, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 29–38.Google Scholar
  26. Parajuli, P. 1990. Power and Knowledge in Development Discourse: New Social Movements and the State in India.International Social Science Journal (Paris, Unesco), No. 125.Google Scholar
  27. Parajuli, P.;Enslin, E. 1990. From Learning Literacy to Regenerating Women's Space: A Story of Women's Empowerment in Nepal.Convergence, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 44–56.Google Scholar
  28. Patnaik, A. 1988. Gramsci's Concept of Common Sense: Towards a Theory of Subaltern Consciousness in Hegemonic Process.Economic and Political Weekly, 30 January, pp. 2–10.Google Scholar
  29. Rahnema, M. 1988. A New Variety of Aids and its Pathogens:Homo Economicus, Development and Aid.Alternatives, Vol. XIII, pp. 117–36.Google Scholar
  30. —. 1990. Participatory Action Research: ‘The Last Temptation of Saint Development’.Alternatives, Vol. XV, pp. 199–226.Google Scholar
  31. Ramdas, L. 1989. Women and Literacy: A Quest for Justice.Prospects, Vol. XIX, No. 4, pp. 519–30.Google Scholar
  32. Sasson, A. S. 1986. The People, Intellectuals and Specialised Knowledge.Boundary, Vol. II, pp. 122–36.Google Scholar
  33. Scott, J. 1985.Weapon of the Weak. New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sengupta, N. 1985. Irrigation: Traditional Vs. Modern.Economic and Political Weekly (special number), November, pp. 1919–38.Google Scholar
  35. Shiva, V. 1988.Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London, Zed.Google Scholar
  36. Stromquist, N. 1990. Women and Illiteracy: The Interplay of Gender Subordination and Poverty.Comparative Education Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 95–111.Google Scholar
  37. Tandon, R. 1988. Social Transformation and Participatory Research.Convergence, Vol. 21, No. 2/3, pp. 5–18.Google Scholar
  38. Thompson, E. P. 1979. Eighteenth-century English Society: Class Struggle Without Class.Social History, Vol. 4, pp. 133–60.Google Scholar
  39. Touraine, A. 1988.Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society. Minneapolis, Minn., University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  40. Weiler, H. 1989.The Knowledge Base of Policy Choices in Education: Mediating Knowledge and Action in the Age of Philosophical and Political Turmoil. Stanford, Calif., SIDEC/Stanford University. (Mimeo.)Google Scholar
  41. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987.Our Common Future. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pramod Parajuli
    • 1
  1. 1.(Nepal)

Personalised recommendations