Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 219–237 | Cite as

An interactive approach to work motivation: The effects of competition, rewards, and goal difficulty on task performance

  • Steven P. Allscheid
  • Douglas F. Cellar
Full Articles

Abstract

This study examined the interactive effects of competition, rewards, and goal difficulty on task performance and goal commitment. Students were assigned to one of eight experimental conditions and participated in a computerized anagram solution task. Rewards significantly increased performance, especially along with difficult goals. Competition was not found to have an effect on goal commitment or task performance, and goal difficulty increased performance although the results did not reach statistical significance. Goal commitment was shown to have a direct effect on task performance as opposed to a moderating role in the goal level-task performance relationship. A discussion of the findings and suggestions for further research are included.

Keywords

Direct Effect Interactive Effect Social Psychology Task Performance Social Issue 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, P.L. (1987). Individual Differences in Skill Learning: An Integration of Psychometric and Information Processing Perspectives.Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3–27.Google Scholar
  2. Cellar, D.F., & Barrett, G.V. (1987). Script processing and intrinsic motivation: The cognitive sets underlying cognitive labels.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 115–135.Google Scholar
  3. Earley, P.C. (1985). Influence of information, choice, and task complexity upon goal acceptance, performance, and personal goals.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 481–491.Google Scholar
  4. Erez, M., & Zidon, I. (1984). Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 69–78.Google Scholar
  5. Hollenbeck, J.R., & Klein, H.J. (1987). Goal commitment and the goal setting process: Problems, prospects and proposals for future research.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 212–220.Google Scholar
  6. Hollenbeck, J.R., Williams, C.R., & Klein, H.J. (1989). An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 18–23.Google Scholar
  7. Huber, V.L. (1985). Effects of task difficulty, goal setting, and strategy on performance of a heuristic task.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 492–504.Google Scholar
  8. Kanfer, R. & Kanfer, F.H. (1991). Goals and self-regulation: Applications of theory to work setting. InAdvances in Motivation and Achievement, JAI Press.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, H.J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation,Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 150–172.Google Scholar
  10. Komaki, J., Barwick, K.D., & Scott, L.R. (1978). A behavioral approach to occupational safety: pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 434–445.Google Scholar
  11. Latham, G.P., & Baldes, J.J. (1975). The “practical significance” of Locke's theory of goal setting.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 122–124.Google Scholar
  12. Leifer, R., & McGannon, K. (1986). Goal acceptance and goal commitment: Their differential impact on goal setting theory. Presented at Academy of Management meeting.Google Scholar
  13. Locke, E.A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157–189.Google Scholar
  14. Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990).A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment.Academy of Management Review, 13, 23–39.Google Scholar
  16. Locke, E.A., & Shaw, K.N. (1984). Atkinson's inverse-U curve and the missing cognitive variables.Psychological Reports, 55, 403–412.Google Scholar
  17. Mento, A.J., Steel, R.P., & Karen, R.J. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966–1984.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 52–83.Google Scholar
  18. Mitchell, T.R., Rothman, M., & Linden, R.C. (1985). Effects of normative information on task performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 48–55.Google Scholar
  19. Mowen, J.C., Middlemist, R.D., & Luther, D. (1981). Joint effects of assigned goal level and incentive structure on task performance: A laboratory study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 598–603.Google Scholar
  20. Mueller, M.E. (1983). The effects of goal setting and competition on performance: A laboratory study. University of Minnesota, Unpublished master's thesis.Google Scholar
  21. Nordstrom, R., Rucker, G., & Hall, R.J. (1988). Performance management in city government: A case study.Public Personnel Management, 17, 159–165.Google Scholar
  22. Porter, L.W. & Miles, R.E. (1974). Motivation and management. In J.W. McGuire (Ed.),Contemporary Management: Issues and Viewpoints Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Sales, S.M. (1970). Some effects of role overload and role underload.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 592–608.Google Scholar
  24. Shalley, C.E., Oldham, G.R., & Porac, J.F. (1987). Effects of goal difficulty, goal-setting method, and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation.Academy of Management Journal, 30, 553–563.Google Scholar
  25. Somers, R.L., Locke, E.A., & Tuttle, T.C. (1985–86). Adding competition to the management basics: An application in the defense department.National Productivity Review, Winter, 7–21.Google Scholar
  26. Steers, R.M. & Porter, L.W. (1987).Motivation and Work Behavior.Fourth Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. White, S.E., Mitchell, T.P. & Bell, Jr., C.H. (1977). Goal setting, evaluation apprehension, and social cues as determinants of job performance and job satisfaction in a simulated organization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 665–673.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven P. Allscheid
    • 1
  • Douglas F. Cellar
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanard & Associates, Inc.Chicago

Personalised recommendations