Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient line search algorithm for unconstrained optimization

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new line search algorithm for smooth unconstrained optimization is presented that requires only one gradient evaluation with an inaccurate line search and at most two gradient evaluations with an accurate line search. It terminates in finitely many operations and shares the same theoretical properties as the standard line search rules like the Armijo-Goldstein-Wolfe-Powell rules. This algorithm is especially appropriate for the situation when gradient evaluations are very expensive relative to function evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dennis, J. E. andSchnabel, R. B.,Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fletcher, R.,Practical Methods of Optimization, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein, A. A.,On Steepest Descent, SIAM Journal on Control, Vol. 3, pp. 147–151, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein, A. A.,Constructive Real Analysis, Harpers and Row, New York, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Armijo, L.,Minimization of Functions Having Lipschitz Continuous First Partial Derivatives, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 16, pp. 1–3, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wolfe, P.,Convergence Conditions for Ascent Methods, SIAM Review, Vol. 11, pp. 226–235, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Powell, M. J. D.,Some Global Convergence Properties of a Variable-Metric Algorithm for Minimization without Exact Line Searches, SIAM-AMS Proceedings, SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vol. 9, pp. 53–72, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luenberger, D. G.,Linear and Nonlinear Programming, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boggs, P. T., andSchnabel, R. B.,Lecture Notes for a Short Course on Numerical Optimization, Manuscript, Houston, Texas, 1987.

  10. Gill, E. P., Murray, W., Saunders, A. M., andWright, H. M. A Note on a Sufficient-Decrease Criterion for a Nonderivative Steplength Procedure, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 23, pp. 349–352, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ortega, J. M., andRheinboldt, W. C.,Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables, Academic Press, London, England, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brent, R. P.,Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Byrd, R. H., Nocedal, andYuan, Y. X.,Global Convergence of a Class of Quasi-Newton Methods on Convex Problems, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 24, pp. 1171–1190, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moré, J. J., Garbow, B. S., andHillstrom, K. E.,Testing Unconstrained Optimization Software, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 7, pp. 17–41, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prapasri, A.,Application of Conjugate Directions and Quasi-Newton Methods in Parallel Unconstrained Optimization, PhD Thesis, University of Iowa, 1989.

  16. Prapasri, A., andPotra, F. A.,Parallel Line Search Algorithms for Solving Convex Unconstrained Minimization Problems, Libertas Mathematica, Vol. 8, pp. 31–46, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Margaret Wright and Jorge Moré for valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potra, F.A., Shi, Y. Efficient line search algorithm for unconstrained optimization. J Optim Theory Appl 85, 677–704 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02193062

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02193062

Key Words

Navigation