Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness of minimax controllers to nonlinear perturbations

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the robustness of minimax controllers, originally designed for nominal linear or nonlinear systems, to unknown static nonlinear perturbations in the state dynamics, measurement equation, and performance index. When the nominal system is linear, we consider both perfect state measurements and general imperfect state measurements; in the case of nominally nonlinear systems, we consider perfect state measurements only. Using a differential game theoretic approach, we show for the former class that, as the perturbation parameter (say, ε>0) approaches zero, the optimal disturbance attenuation level for the overall system converges to the optimal disturbance attenuation level for the nominal system if the nonlinear structural uncertainties satisfy certain prescribed growth conditions. We also show that anH -controller, designed based on a chosen performance level for the nominal linear system, achieves the same performance level when the parameter ε is smaller than a computable threshold, except for the finite-horizon imperfect state measurements case. For that case, we show that the design of the nominal controller must be based on a decreased confidence level of the initial data, and a controller thus designed again achieves a desired performance level in the face of nonlinear perturbations satisfying a computable norm bound. In the case of nominally nonlinear systems, and assuming that the nominal system is solvable, we obtain sufficient conditions such that the nominal controller achieves a desired performance in the face of perturbations satisfying computable norm bounds. In this way, we provide a characterization of the class of uncertainties that are tolerable for a controller designed based on the nominal system. The paper also presents two numerical examples; in one of these, the nominal system is linear; in the other one, it is nonlinear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Isidori, A., andAstolfi, A.,Disturbance Attenuation and H -Control via Measurement Feedback in Nonlinear Systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 37, pp. 1283–1293, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Schaft, A. J.,On a State-Space Approach to Nonlinear H -Control, Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 16, pp. 1–8, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van der Schaft, A. J.,L 2-Gain Analysis of Nonlinear Systems and Nonlinear H -Control, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 37, pp. 770–784, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Isidori, A.,New Results on Nonlinear H -Control via Measurement Feedback, Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications, Edited by T. Başar and A. Haurie, Birkhäuser, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 56–69, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Isidori, A.,H -Control via Measurement Feedback for Affine Nonlinear Systems, Technical Report, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isidori, A.,Feedback Control of Nonlinear Systems, Proceedings of the 1st European Control Conference, Grenoble, France, pp. 1001–1012, 1991.

  7. Didinsky, G., Başar, T., andBernhard, P.,Structural Properties of Minimax Controllers for a Class of Differential Games Arising in Nonlinear H -Control, Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 21, pp. 433–441, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ball, J. A., andHelton, J. W.,H -Control for Nonlinear Plants: Connections with Differential Games, Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Decision and Control, Tampa, Florida, pp. 956–962, 1989.

  9. Ball, J. A., Helton, J. W., andWalker, M.,H -Control for Nonlinear Systems with Output Feedback, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 38, pp. 546–559, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xie, L., de Souza, C. E., andFragoso, M. D.,H -Filtering for Linear Periodic Systems with Parameter Uncertainty, Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 17, pp. 343–350, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khargonekar, P. P., Petersen, I. R., andZhou, K.,Robust Stabilization of Uncertain Linear Systems: Quadratic Stabilizability and H -Control Theory, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 35, pp. 356–361, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xie, L., de Souza, C. E., andFu, M.,H -Estimation for Linear Discrete-Time Uncertain Systems, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 2, pp. 111–123, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gahinet, P., andStoorvogel, A. A.,Continuity Properties of the H -Optimal Gain, Proceedings of the European Control Conference, Groningen, Netherlands, pp. 1171–1175, 1993.

  14. Garofalo, F., andLeitmann, G.,Nonlinear Composite Control of a Class of Nominally Linear Singularly Perturbed Uncertain Systems, Deterministic Control of Uncertain Systems, Edited by A. S. I. Zinober, IEE Press, London, England, pp. 269–288, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pan, Z., andBaşar, T.,H -Optimal Control for Singularly Perturbed Systems, Part 1: Perfect State Measurements, Automatica, Vol. 29, pp. 401–423, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pan, Z., andBaşar, T.,H -Optimal Control for Singularly Perturbed Systems, Part 2: Imperfect State Measurements, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 39, pp. 280–299, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Başar, T., andBernhard, P.,H -Optimal Control and Related Minimax Design Problems: A Dynamic Game Approach, Birkhäuser, Boston, Massachusetts, 1991; second edition 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Başar, T., andOlsder, G. J.,Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory, 2nd edition, Academic Press, London, England, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rudin, W.,Principles of Mathematical Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pan, Z., andBaşar, T.,Robustness of Minimax Controllers to Nonlinear Perturbations, CSL Report, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Willems, J. C.,Least Squares Stationary Optimal Control and the Algebraic Riccati Equation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 16, pp. 621–634, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khammash, M. H.,Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Robustness of Time-Varying Systems with Applications to Sampled-Data Systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 38, pp. 49–57, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khammash, M., andPearson, J. B.,Performance Robustness of Discrete-Time Systems with Structured Uncertainty, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 6, pp. 398–412, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khammash, M., andPearson, J. B.,Analysis and Design for Robust Performance with Structured Uncertainty, Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 20, pp. 179–187, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Whittle, P.,Likelihood and Cost as Path Integrals, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 53B, pp. 505–538, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pan, Z., andBaşar, T.,Model Simplification and Optimal Control of Stochastic Singularly Perturbed Systems under Exponentiated Quadratic Cost, Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, Florida, pp. 1700–1705, 1994.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Leitmann

This research was supported in part by the US Department of Energy, Grant DE-FG-02-88-ER-13939 and in part by the National Science Foundation, Grant ECS-91-13153.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, Z., Başar, T. Robustness of minimax controllers to nonlinear perturbations. J Optim Theory Appl 87, 631–678 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192138

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192138

Key Words

Navigation