Skip to main content
Log in

Gratification versus frustration: The legacy of the schism between Ferenczi and Freud

  • Articles
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tension between whether to gratify or frustrate a patient reappears countless times in the course of every therapeutic treatment. This tension, so dramatically encapsulated in the relationship between Ferenczi and Freud, and resurfaced repeatedly in the writings and teachings of such influential thinkers as Alexander, Greenson, Stone, Brenner, Winnicott, Kohut and Kernberg.

In this paper, we track how the general concepts of frustration and gratification continually re-emerge in one or another form, and are considered and debated by our most gifted psychoanalytic writers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, S. (1990). The psychoanalytic process: The developmental and the integrative.Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LIX: 650–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, G. (1986). Psychotherapy of the narcissistic personality disorder patient: Two contrasting approaches.American Journal of Psychiatry, April 143: 4:430–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F. (1935). The problem of psychoanalytic technique. InThe Scope of Psychoanalysis, 1921–1961, Selected Papers of Franz Alexander, New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F. (1954). Some qualitative aspects of psychoanalytic technique.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2: 685–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F. (1956). Two forms of regression and their therapeutic implications. InThe Scope of Psychoanalysis, 1921–1961, Selected Papers of Franz Alexander, New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F. (1958). Unexplored areas in psychoanalytic theory and treatment—Part II. InThe Scope of Psychoanalysis, 1921–1961, Selected Papers of Franz Alexander, New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F. (1960). Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. InThe Scope of Psychoanalysis, 1921–1961, Selected Papers of Franz Alexander, New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F. & French, T.M. (1946).Psychoanalytic therapy, principles and application. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacal, H.A. (1984). Optimal responsiveness and the therapeutic process. In A. Goldberg (Ed.),Progress in Self Psychology, 1: 202–227. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balint, M. (1968).The basic fault: Therapeutic aspects of regression. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balint, M. (1969). Trauma and object relationship,International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50: 429–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, C. (1979). Working alliance, therapeutic alliance, and transference. In Esman, A.H. (Ed.),Essential Papers on Transference, 172–187. New York: New York University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, M. (1974).The myth of the eternal return. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel, O. (1941). The ego and the affects. InCollected Papers, Second Series. New York: Norton, 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1928). The elasticity of psychoanalytic technique. In M. Balint (Ed.),The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi: Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psychoanalysis, 3, 87–101, New York Basic Books, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1929). The unwelcome child and his death instinct. In M. Balint (Ed.),The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi: Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psychoanalysis, 3, 102–107. New York Basic Books, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1930). The principles of relaxation and neocatharsis. In M. Balint (Ed.),The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi: Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psychoanalysis, 3, 108–125, New York Basic Books, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1931). Child-analysis in the analysis of adults. In M. Balint (Ed.),The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi: Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psychoanalysis, 3, 126–142, New York Basic Books, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child: The language of tenderness and of passion. In M. Balint (Ed.),The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi: Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psychoanalysis, 3, 156–167, New York Basic Books, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, R. (1990).The history of psychoanalysis. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1910). The future prospects of psychoanalytic therapy. In J. Riviere (Trans.),Collected Papers, Vol. 2: Clinical Papers, Papers on Technique, 285–296. New York: Basic Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations for physicians on the psychoanalytic method of treatment. In J. Riviere (Trans.),Collected Papers, Vol. 2: Clinical Papers, Papers on Technique, 323–333. New York: Basic Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1913). Further recommendations in the technique of psychoanalysis: The question of the first communication; the dynamics of the cure. In J. Riviere (Trans.),Collected Papers, Vol. 2: Clinical Papers, Papers on Technique, 342–365. New York: Basic Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1914). Further recommendations in the technique of psychoanalysis: Recollection, repetition and working through. In J. Riviere (Trans.),Collected Papers, Vol. 2: Clinical Papers, Papers on Technique, 366–376. New York: Basic Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1915). Further recommendations in the technique of psychoanalysis: Observations on transference-love. In J. Riviere (Trans.),Collected Papers, Vol. 2: Clinical Papers, Papers on Technique, 377–391. New York: Basic Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, P. (1988).Freud: A life for our time. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedo, J.E. (1986).Conceptual issues in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenson, R.R. (1965). The working alliance and the transference neurosis. In A.H. Esman (Ed.),Essential Papers on Transference, 150–171. New York: New York University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenson, R.R. (1967).The technique and practice of psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenson, R.R. (1971). The “real” relationship between the patient and the psychoanalyst. In M. Kanzer (Ed.),The Unconscious Today, New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1958).Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynal, A. (1989). Controversies in psychoanalytic method: From Freud and Ferenczi to Michael Balint. E. Holder (Trans.), Washington Square, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke, C. (1987). Kohut's concept of cure.Psychoanalytic Review, 74(4): 537–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (1957).The life and work of Sigmund Freud, the last phase: 1919–1939, vol. 3. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe, F. De, J. Rijnierse, & R. Janssen. (1992). The role of support on psychoanalysis.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 40(2): 475–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1975).Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1976). A psychoanalytic classification of character pathology. In R.F. Lax (Ed.),Essential Papers on Character Neurosis, 191–210. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1982). The theory of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In S. Slipp (Ed.),Curative Factors in Dynamic Psychotherapy, 21–43. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1984).Severe personality disorders. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971).The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1977).The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984).How does psychoanalysis cure? A. Goldberg (Ed.) in collaboration with P.E. Stepansky. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kris, E. (1952).Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewald, H. (1980).Papers on psychoanalysis. Westford, MA: Murray Printing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lum, W.B. (1988). Sandor Ferenczi (1873–1933)—The father of the empathic-interpersonal approach. Part two: Evolving techniques, final contributions and legacy.Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 16(3): 317–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, A. (1991). A confusion of tongues of whose reality is it?Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LX: 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, A. (1990).Other times, other realities Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, A. (1988). The rule of empathy: Sandor Ferenczi's pioneering contributions to the empathic method in psychoanalysis.Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 16(1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, A. (1980). Toward a critique of the psychology of the self.Psychoanalytic Quarterly, XLIX: 423–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64: 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. (1961).The psychoanalytic situation. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. (1967). The psychoanalytic situation and transference: Postscript to an earlier communication. In A.H. Esman (Ed.),Essential Papers on Transference, 280–330. New York: New York University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. (1981). Notes on the noninterpretive elements in the psychoanalytic situation and process.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 29: 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarachow, S. (1963).An introduction to psychotherapy. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, R.S. (1985). How does self psychology differ in practice?International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66: 391–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W. (1947). Hate in the countertransference. InCollected Papers, 194–203. London: Tavistock, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, B. (1984). The cost of compliance: A patient's response to the conditions of psychotherapy. In A. Goldberg (Ed.),Progress in Self Psychology, 1: 147–163. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmer, A.B., Meyer, W.S. Gratification versus frustration: The legacy of the schism between Ferenczi and Freud. Clin Soc Work J 23, 249–269 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191750

Keywords

Navigation