Abstract
We describe the construction and analysis of derivatives of the yeastTDH3 promoter in which the TATA box element has been replaced by a portion of the phage lambda operator containing a consensus TATA site flanked by binding sites for the cl repressor. Transcription of a reporter gene under the control of such a promoter is reduced in cells that express the cl repressor protein. Deletion of the native TATA element of theTDH3 promoter reduces transcription to the same extent. The cl repressor may act by “masking” the TATA element located between the repressor binding sites. Furthermore, the use of a temperature-sensitive cl repressor allowed temperature-dependent transcription of the reporter gene.
References
Bennetzen JL, Hall BD (1982) The primary structure of theSaccharomyces cerevisiae gene for alcohol-dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 257:3018–3025
Bitter GA, Chang KKH, Egan KM (1991) A multi-component upstream activation sequence of theSaccharomyces cerevisiae glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene promoter. Mol Gen Genet 231:22–32
Brent R, Ptashne M (1984) A bacterial repressor protein or a yeast transcriptional terminator can block upstream activation of a yeast gene. Nature 312:612–615
Brown M, Figge J, Wright C, Hansen U, Jeang KT, Khoury G, Livingston DM, Roberts TM (1987)lac repressor can regulate expression from a hybrid-SV40 early promoter containing alac operator in animal cells. Cell 49:603–612
Chevallier MR, Bloch JC, Lacroute F (1979) Qualitative detection of penicillinase produced by yeast strains carrying chimeric yeast-E. coli plasmids. FEBS Lett 180:179–180
Frohberg C, Heins L, Gatz C (1991) Characterization of the interaction of plant transcription factors using a bacterial repressor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:470–474
Hitzeman RA, Hagie FE, Hayflick IS, Chen CY, Seeburg CY, Seeburg PH (1982) The primary structure of theSaccharomyces cerevisiae gene for 3-phosphoglycerate kinase. Nucl Acids Res 10:7791–7808
Holland JP, Holland MJ (1980) Structural comparison of two non-tandemly related yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes. J Biol Chem 255:2596–2605
Holland JP, Labieniec L, Swimmer C, Holland MJ (1983) Homologous nucleotide sequences at the 5′ termini of messenger RNAs synthesized from the yeast enolase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene families: the primary structure of a third yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene. J Biol Chem 258: 5291–5299
Hu MC-T, Davidson N (1987) The induciblelac operator-repressor system is functional in mammalian cells. Cell 48: 555–566
Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murada K, Kimura A (1983) Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bact 153:163–168
Klenz G, Häfner B (1981) Comparing characterization of α-amylase preparations. Lebensmittelindustrie 28:71–74
Kunkel TA (1985) Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:488–492
Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
Musti AM, Zehner Z, Bostian KA, Paterson BM, Kramer RA (1983) Transcriptional mapping of two yeast genes coding for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase isolated by sequence homology with the chicken gene. Gene 25:133–143
Pardo JM, Ianez E, Zalacain M, Claros MG, Jimenez A (1988) Similar short elements in the 5′ regions of theSTA2 and SGA genes fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 239:179–184
Piper PW, Curran BPG (1990) When a glycolytic gene on a yeast 2μ on-STB plasmid is made essential for growth its expression level is a major determinant of plasmid copy number. Curr Genet 17:119–123
Rigby PW, Deickmann M, Rhodes C, Berg P (1977) Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerasel. J Mol Biol 113:237–251
Rose M, Winston F (1984) Identification of Ty insertion within the coding sequence of theSaccharomyces cerevisiae ura3 gene. Mol Gen Genet 193:557–560
Rose M, Grisafi P, Botstein D (1984) Structure and function of the yeastURA3 gene: expression inEscherichia coli. Gene 29:113–124
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467
Sanger F, Coulson AR, Hong GF, Hill DF, Petersen GB (1982) Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage lambda DNA. J Mol Biol 162:729–773
Smith GM, Mileham KA, Cooke SE, Woolston SJ, George HK, Charles AD, Brammar WJ (1988) TheEscherichia coli LexA repressor operator system works in mamalian cells. EMBO J 7:3975–3982
Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517
Struhl K (1985) Nucleotide sequence and transcriptional mapping of the yeastpet56-his3-ded1 gene region. Nucleic Acids Res 13:8587–8601
Thomas PS (1980) Hybridization of denatured RNA and small DNA fragments transferred to nitrocellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:5201–5202
Udaka S, Tsukagoshi N, Yamagata H (1986) Bacterial amylase genes and their expression. Denpun Kagaku 33:112–118
Wilde RJ, Shufflebottom D, Cooke S, Jasinska I, Merryweather A, Beri R, Brammar WJ, Bevan M, Schuch W (1992) Control of gene expression in tobacco cells using a bacterial operator repressor system. EMBO J 11: 1251–1259
Yamashita I, Suzuki K, Fukui S (1985) Nucleotide sequence of the extracellular glucoamylase geneSTA1 in the yeastSaccharomyces diastaticus. J Bacteriol 161:567–573
Yuuki T, Nomura T, Tezuka H, Tsuboi A, Yamagata H, Tsukagoshi N, Udaka S (1985) Complete nucleotide sequence of a gene coding for heat- and pH-stable alpha-amylase ofBacillus licheniformis: comparison of the amino acid sequences of three bacterial liquefying alpha-amylases deduced from the DNA sequence. J Biochem 98:1147–1156
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by C. P. Hollenberg
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wedler, H., Wambutt, R. A temperature-sensitive lambda cl repressor functions on a modified operator in yeast cells by masking the TATA element. Molec. Gen. Genet. 248, 499–505 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191651
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191651