Skip to main content
Log in

The munich diagnostic checklist for the assessment of DSM-III-R Personality Disorders for use in routine clinical care and research

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Diagnostic checklists for the assessment of DSM-III-R Axis I diagnoses have proven to be a reliable and feasable instrument in research and routine clinical care. Therefore, a checklist for the assessment of the DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (MDCL-P) has been developed. An English version of the MDCL-P is available. The MDCL-P has been tested for reliability in a test-retest design. The average duration of the interview was 36 min. Of the patients, 48% received a diagnosis of at least one personality disorder. The Kappa value concerning the distinction personality disorder as opposed to no personality disorder was 0.62. The range of Kappa values of specific personality disorders, which were diagnosed at least five times, was from 0.35 to 0.79.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishop YMM, Feinberg SE, Holland PW (1975) Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bronisch T (1992) Diagnostik von Persönlichkeitsstörungen nach den Kriterien aktueller internationaler Klassifikations-systeme. Verhaltenstherapie 2:140–150

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bronisch T, Hiller W, Zaudig M, Mombour W (in press) MDCL-P Münchner Diagnose-Checklisten für die DSM-III-R/ICD-10 Persönlichkeitsstörungen (MDCL-P). Hans Huber, Bern

  4. Bronisch T, Klerman GL (1991) Personality functioning: change and stability in relationship to symptoms and psychopathology. J Pers Dis 5:307–317

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carey C, Gottesman II (1979) Reliability and validity in binary ratings. Areas of common misunderstanding in diagnosis and symptom ratings. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35:1454–1459

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grove WM, Andreasen NC, McDonald-Scott P, Keller MB, Shapiro RW (1981) Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis. Theory and practice. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38:408–413

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hiller W, Bose M von, Dichtl G, Agerer D (1990) Reliability of checklist-guided diagnoses for DSM-III-R affective and anxiety disorders. J Affect Dis 20:235–247

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hiller W, Zaudig M, Mombour W (1990) Development of diagnostic checklists for use in routine clinical care. A guideline designed to assess DSM-III-R diagnoses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 47:782–784

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hyler SE, Rieder RO, Spitzer RL (1978) Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ). New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hyler SE, Rieder RO, Williams JB, Spitzer RL, Hendler J, Lyons M (1988) The personality diagnostic questionnaire: development and preliminary results. J Pers Dis 2:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hyler SE, Skodol AE, Kellmann HD, Oldham JM, Rosnick L (1990) Validity of the personality diagnostic questionnaire—revised: comparison with two structured interviews. Am J Psychiatry 147:1043–1048

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hyler SE, Skodol AE, Oldham JM, Kellman DH, Doidge N (1992) Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire—Revised: A replication in an outpatient sample. Compr Psychiatry 33:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loranger AW (1988) Personality Disorder Examination (PDE) Manual. DV Communications, Yonkers, NY

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loranger AW, Lehmann Susman V, Oldham JM, Russakoff LM (1987) The personality disorder examination: a preliminary report. J Pers Dis 1:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  17. Millon T (1983) Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory—Manual (3rd ed). National Computer Systems, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  18. Millon T (1987) Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory—II (manual). National Computer Systems, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  19. O'Boyle M, Self D (1990) A comparison of two interviews for DSM-III-R personality disorder. Psychiatry Res 32:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pfohl B, Blum N, Zimmerman M, Stangl D (1989) Structured Interview for DSM-III-R Personality SIDP-R. Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pfohl B, Stangl D, Zimmermann M (1982) The Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders (SIDP). Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reich JH, Green AI (1991) Effect of personality disorders on outcome of treatment. J Nerv Ment Dis 179:74–82

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shrout PE, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL (1987) Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis revisited. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:172–177

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW (1986) Structured clinical interview for DSM-III personality disorders (SCID II, 2/1/86). Biometric Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First M (1990) User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. American Psychiatric Association Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spitznagel EL, Helzer JE (1985) A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:725–728

    Google Scholar 

  27. Standage K, Ladha N (1988) An examination of the reliability of the personality disorder examination and a comparison with other methods of identifying personality disorders in a clinical sample. J Pers Dis 2:267–271

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stangl D, Pfohl B, Zimmermann M, Bowers W, Corenthal C (1985) A structured interview for the DSM-III personality disorders. A preliminary report. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:591–596

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zerssen D von (1986) Clinical self-rating scales (CSR-S) of the Munich Psychiatric Information System (Psychis München). In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds) Assessment of Depression. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 270–303

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bronisch, T., Garcia-Borreguero, D., Flett, S. et al. The munich diagnostic checklist for the assessment of DSM-III-R Personality Disorders for use in routine clinical care and research. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 242, 77–81 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191550

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191550

Key words

Navigation