Skip to main content
Log in

Psychosocial aspects in the treatment of children with myelomeningocele: An assessment after a decade

  • Living Pediatrics Symposium in Honour of the 80th Birthday of Professor E. Rossi, Berne, Switzerland
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to recognize the possible psychological advantages when children with a severe CNS disorder like myelomeningocele (MMC) are given very early rehabilitation treatment. One hundred and seven newborns with MMC seen between 1971–1992 were prospectively analysed with respect to two different therapeutic approaches. The children born during the period 1971–1980 did not receive very early therapeutic rehabilitation treatment, whereas those born during the period 1981–1992, received this treatment. In the latter group, special attention was paid to support an improvement in the difficult relationship between the parents and the child with MMC as well as between parents and caregivers. The following statistically significant differences between the two treatment programmes were found: (1) all children achieved independent locomotion at 5 years, in the very early intervention group, compared to only 35% (P<0.001) in the group without this programme. Orthopaedic operations in the first-mentioned group were markedly reduced; (2) urological surgery decreased drastically in the group with very early urodynamic rehabilitation. Thus, there were 0.6 operations per patient in the older group, but only 0.06 operations per patient in the younger one (P<0.001); (3) normal schooling was reached by 76% (22/29) and social continence by 80% (23/29) of the children with very early interventional therapy. In the older group only 54% reached normal schooling (P<0.05) and 29% social continence (P<0.001). The very early co-ordinated medical and physiotherapeutic rehabilitation treatment of children with MMC usually reduces the psychosocial stress and improves the quality of life of these children and of their families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MMC :

myelomeningocele

References

  1. Bettex M (1979) Indikationen und Kontraindikationen in der Behandlung der Myelomeningozele und des Hydrozephalus. Z Kinderchir 27: 120–124

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bobath K, Bobath B (1967) The very early treatment of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 9: 373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. D'Avignon M, Norén L, Arman T (1981) Early physiotherapy ad modum Vojta or Bobath in infants with suspected neuromotor disturbance. Neuropediatrics 12: 232–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guiney EG, Surana R (1994) Presidential Address to the Society for Research Into Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus, at Hartford, Conn., USA. Eur J Pediatr Surg [Suppl]: I: 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hunt GM (1990) Open spina bifida: outcome for a complete cohort treated unselectively and followed into adulthood. Dev Med Child Neurol 32: 108–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaiser G, Rüdeberg A (1986) Comments on the management of newborn with spina bifida cystica — active treatment or no treatment. Z Kinderchir 41: 141–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Köng E (1972) Die Früherfassung zerebraler Bewegungsstörungen. In: Zurbrügg RP (ed) Früherfassung von Kinderkrankheiten. Pädiatrische Fortbildungskurse für die Praxis. S Karger, Basel, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS (1972) Clean, intermittent selfcatheterisation in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol 107: 458–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorber J (1971) Results of treatment of myelomeningocele. An analysis of 524 unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment. Dev Med Child Neurol 13: 279–303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lorber J, Salfield AW (1981) Results of selective treatment of spina bifida. Arch Dis Child 56: 822–830

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EH (1990) Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 336: 1217–1218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malone PS, Wheeler RA, Williams JE (1994) Continence in patients with spina bifida: long term results. Arch Dis Child 70: 107–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norén L, Franzén G (1981) An evaluation of seven postural reactions (Lagereflexe selected by Vojta) in twentyfive healthy infants. Neuropediatrics 12: 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  14. O'Brien J, Austen M, Sethi P, O'Boyle P (1991) Urinary incontinence: prevalence, need for treatment, and effectiveness of intervention by nurse. BMJ 303: 1308–1312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ryan KD, Ploski Ch, Emans JB (1991) Myodysplasia—the musculoskeletal problem: habilitation from infancy to adulthood. Phys Ther 7: 935–945

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shandling B, Gilmour RF (1987) The enema continence catheter in spina bifida: successful bowel management. J Pediatr Surg 22: 271–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Surana RH, Quinn FMJ, Guiney EJ, Fitzgerald RJ (1991) Are the selection criteria for the conservative management of spina bifida still applicable? Eur J Pediatr Surg [Suppl] I: 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wyndaele JJ, Maes D (1990) Clean intermittent catheterisation: 12 follow up. J Urol 143: 906–908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rüdeberg, A., Donati, F. & Kaiser, G. Psychosocial aspects in the treatment of children with myelomeningocele: An assessment after a decade. Eur J Pediatr 154 (Suppl 4), S85–S89 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191514

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191514

Key words

Navigation