Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 165–178 | Cite as

“Getting even”: Clinical considerations of adaptive and maladaptive vengeance

  • Martha A. Gabriel
  • Gail W. Monaco
Articles

Abstract

This article is intended to acquaint the reader with the concept of vengeance. Conceptualized as the intense, compelling wish or intention to get even, right a wrong, or avenge an injury, vengeance is best understood on a continuum from innocuous retaliatory fantasies/actions on one end of the continuum to meeting out of death and destruction on the other end. This article identifies various manifestations of vengeance, discusses theoretical formulations related to affects in general and vengeance, in particular, and presents a series of case vignettes which highlight the adaptive and maladaptive function of this psychological phenomenon.

Keywords

Social Psychology Theoretical Formulation Clinical Consideration Psychological Phenomenon Case Vignette 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, K. (1924). The influence of oral erotism in character formulation.Selected Papers of Karl Abraham New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Arlow, J. (1980). The revenge motive in the primal scene.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 28, 519–541.Google Scholar
  3. Basch, M.F. (1992). The significance of a theory of affect in psychoanalytic technique. In T. Shapiro and R. Emde (Eds.),Affects: Psychoanalytic Perspective (pp. 291–303). Connecticut: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bluestone, H. & Travin, S. (1984). Murder: The ultimate conflict.American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 44(2), 147–167.Google Scholar
  5. Boris, J. (1990). Identification with a vengeance.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 127–140.Google Scholar
  6. Brenner, C. (1992). A psychoanalytic theory of affects. In T. Shapiro & R. Emde (Eds.),Affects: Psychoanalytic perspectives (pp. 305–314). Connecticut: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  7. Daniels, M. (1969). Pathological vindictiveness and the vindictive character.Psychoanalytic Review, 56(2), 169–196.Google Scholar
  8. Fenichel, O. (1945).The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York: Norton Books.Google Scholar
  9. Fromm, E. (1973).The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  10. Hackett, G. & Lerner, M. (1987, December 21). Settling a score.Newsweek. p. 43.Google Scholar
  11. Horney, K. (1948). The value of vindictiveness.American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 8, 3–12.Google Scholar
  12. Kernberg, O. (1992). The psychopathology of hatred. In T. Shapiro & R. Emde (Eds.),Affects: Psvchoanalytic Perspectives (p. 209–238). Connecticut: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Keyishian, J. (1982). Karen Horney on “the value of vindictiveness”.American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 42, 21–26.Google Scholar
  14. Kirman, W. (1989). Revenge and accommodation in the family.Modern Psychoanalysis, 14,(1), 89–95.Google Scholar
  15. Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27, 360–400.Google Scholar
  16. Marks, M. (1988). Remorse, revenge and forgiveness.Psychotherapy Patient, 5, 317–330.Google Scholar
  17. Marzuk, P., Tardiff, K., & Hirsch, C. (1992) The epidemiology of murder-suicide.The Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3179–3183.Google Scholar
  18. Nelson, M. (1973). On the utility of spite.Psychoanalytic Review, 60(1), 91–100.Google Scholar
  19. Searles, H. (1962). Scorn, disillusionment and adoration in the psychotherapy of schizophrenic.Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Review, 49(3), 142–150.Google Scholar
  20. — (1956). The psychodynamics of vengefulness.Psychiatry, 19, 31–39.Google Scholar
  21. Sims, C. (1992, March 1). A commissioner done in by a staff she offended.New York Times, 4, p. 6.Google Scholar
  22. Socarides, C. (1966). On vengeance.Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 14(2), 356–375.Google Scholar
  23. Stein, R. (1991).Psychoanalytic theories of affect. New York: Preaeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Tomkins, S.S. (1962–1963).Affect, Imagery, Consciousness. 2 vols. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Turow, S. (1987)Presumed Innocent. Farrar, Strauss & Geroux: New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha A. Gabriel
    • 1
  • Gail W. Monaco
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Social WorkNew York UniversityNew York
  2. 2.New York

Personalised recommendations