Visual 3D illusion: A systems-theoretical approach to psychosis

  • U. Schmeider
  • F. M. Leweke
  • U. Sternemann
  • H. M. Emrich
  • M. M. Weber
Original Paper


Binocular depth inversion represents an illusion of visual perception. Such an inversion does not occur in all cases, especially when objects with a higher degree of familiarity (e.g. photographs of faces) are displayed. Cognitive factors are assumed to override the binocular disparity cues of stereopsis. We tested the hypothesis that during psychotic and similar states the human CNS is unable to correct the implausible perceptual hypothesis. Measurements of binocular depth inversion in perception of 3D objects were performed in schizophrenic patients (n=13), in patients with alcohol withdrawal (n=10), in sleep-deprived medical staff (n=10) and in healthy volunteers (n=41). The binocular depth inversion scores were highly elevated in the patient group and in the sleep-deprivated medical staff in comparison with healthy volunteers. The data demonstrate that impairment of binocular depth inversion reflects a common final pathway, characterized by an impairment of adaptive systems regulating perception.

Key words

Binocular depth inversion Schizophrenia Alcohol withdrawal Sleep deprivation Systems theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Broadbent D (1958) Perception and communication, Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carlsson A (1988) Speculations on the control of mental and motor functions by dopamine-modulated cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical feedback loops. M Sinai J MedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chapman LJ, Chapman JP (1973) Disordered thought in schizophrenia. Meredith, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emrich HM (1988) Zur Entwicklung einer Systemtheorie produktiver Psychosen. Nervenarzt 59:456–464Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emrich HM (1989) A three-component-system-hypothesis of psychosis. Impairment of binocular depth inversion as an indicator of functional dysequilibrium. Br J Psychiatry 155 (Suppl 5):37–39Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emrich HM, Weber MM, Wendl A, Zihl J, Meyer L von, Hanisch W (1991) Reduced binocular depth inversion as an indicator of cannabis-induced censorship impairment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 40:689Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frith CD, Done DJ (1989) Experiences of alien control in schizophrenia reflect a disorder in central monitoring of action. Psychol Med 19:356–363Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frith CD, Done DJ (1988) Towards a neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 153:437–443Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gray JA, Rawlins JNP (1986) Comparator and buffer memory: an attempt to integrate two models of hippocampal functions. In: Isaacson RL, Pribram KH (eds) The hippocampus, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 159–201Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinemann LG (1966) Der mehrtägige Schlafentzug in der experimentallen Psychoseforschung: Psychopathologie und EEG. Arch Psychiatr Z. Ges Neurologie 208:177–197Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huxley A (1954) The doors of perception. Chatto and Windus, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malenka RC, Angel RW, Hampton B, Berger PA (1982) Impaired central error-correcting behavior in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39:101–107Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGie A, Chapman J (1961) Disorders of attention and perception in early schizophrenia. Br J Med Psychol 34:103–117Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mumford D (1992) On the computational architecture of the neocortex. Biol Cybern 66:241–251Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olton DS (1989) Mnemonic functions of the hippocampus: single unit analyses in rats. In: Chan-Palay V, Köhler C (eds) The hippocampus: new vistas. Liss, New York, pp 411–424Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sullivan JT, Sykora K, Schneidermann J, Naranjo CA, Sellers EM (1989) Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale. Br J Addiction 84:1353–1357Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van den Enden A, Spekreijse H (1989) Binocular depth reversals despite familiarity cues. Science 244:959–961Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wagemans J, Kolinsky R (1994) Perceptual organisation and object recognition—POOR is the acronym, rich the notion. Perception 23(4):371–382Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Watzlawick P (1985) Wirklichkeitsanpassung oder die angepasste “Wirklichkeit”? In: Einführung in den Kontruktivismus (Schriften der Carl-Friedrich-von-Siemens-Stifung, Bd. 10) Oldenbourg, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    West L, Janszen HH, Lester B, Comelisoon FS (1962) The psychosis of sleep deprivation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 96:66–70Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wheatstone C (1838) Proc R Soc 128:371–394Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wheatstone C (1852) Philos Mag 4:504Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolf R (1985) Binokulares Sehen, Raumverrechnung und Raumwahrnehmung. Biologie unserer Zeit 15:161–178Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yellott JI (1981) Binocular depth inversion. Sci Am 245:118–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Schmeider
    • 1
  • F. M. Leweke
    • 1
  • U. Sternemann
    • 1
  • H. M. Emrich
    • 1
  • M. M. Weber
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Psychiatry and PsychotherapySchool of MedicineHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute of PsychiatryMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations