Skip to main content
Log in

Event-related potentials in methamphetamine psychosis during an auditory discrimination task

A preliminary report

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) during a syllable discrimination task were recorded from 15 patients suffering from methamphetamine (MAP) psychosis after the remission of acute psychotic symptoms, and from 15 normal age-matched controls. Subjects were instructed to press a button in response to the target syllables applied to one designated ear. In MAP psychotics, the attention-related negative components (Nd) area was reduced and P300 latency was delayed compared with normal controls. MAP psychotics and controls did not differ significantly in P300 amplitude. These findings suggest that MAP psychotics show some impairment in the auditory information processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angrist B, Sudilovsky A (1978) Central nervous system stimulants. 3. Amphetamine and methamphetamine. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology Vol. 11. Plenum Press, New York, pp 111–123

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angrist B, van Kammen DP (1984) CNS stimulants as tools in the study of schizophrenia. Trends Neurosci 7:388–390

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baribeau-Braun J, Picton TW, Gosselin J (1983) Schizophrenia: A neuropsychological evaluation of abnormal information processing. Science 219:874–876

    Google Scholar 

  4. Connell PH (1958) Amphetamine psychosis. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis JM (1976) Comparative doses and costs of antipsychotic medication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33:858–861

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988) Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 11:357–374

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fujimori A, Nakatani Y, Sakaguchi M (1989) Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis klinischer Verläufe von chronischen Methamphetamin-Psychosen. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 57:383–394

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grinspoon L, Bakalar JB (1985) Drug dependence. Amphetamines. In: Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ (eds) Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. ed. 4. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1619–1621

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hillyard SA, Kutas M (1983) Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annu Rev Psychol 34:44–61

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iwanami A, Kato N, Nakatani Y (1991) P300 in methamphetamine psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 1991 30:726–730

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kameyama T, Niwa S, Hiramatsu K, Saitoh O, Fukuda M, Nakagome K, Itoh K (1987) Event-related potential correlates of psychotropic drug effects on attentional and hemispheric-dysfunction in schizophrenia. In: Takahashi R, Flor-Henry R, Gruzelier J, Niwa S (eds) Cerebral dynamics: Laterality and psychopathology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 221–230

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E (1977) Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197:792–795

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kutcher SP, Blackwood DHR, St Clair D, Gaskell DF, Muir WJ (1987) Auditory P300 in borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:645–650

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michie PT, Fox AM, Ward PB, Catts SV, McConaghy N (1991) Event-related indices of selective attention and cortical lateralization in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 27:209–227

    Google Scholar 

  15. Näätänen R (1982) Processing negativity. An evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull 192:605–640

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nakatani Y, Yoshizawa J, Yamada H, Iwanami A, Sakaguchi M, Kato N (1989) Methamphetamine psychosis in Japan: a survey. Br J Addict 84:1548–1549

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phefferbaum A, Ford JM, White PM, Roth WT (1989) P3 in schizophrenia is affected by stimulus modality, response requirements, medication status, and negative symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 6:1035–1044

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pritchard WS (1986) Cognitive event-related potentials in schizophrenics. Psychol Bull 100:43–66

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saitoh O, Niwa S, Hiramatsu K, Kameyama T, Rymar K, Itoh K (1984) Abnormalities in late positive components of eventrelated potentials may reflect a genetic predisposition to schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 19:293–303

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sato M, Chen CC, Akiyama K, Otsuki S (1983) Acute exacerbation of paranoid psychotic state after long-term abstinence in patients with previous methamphetamine psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 18:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  21. Snyder SH (1973) Amphetamine psychosis. A “Model” schizophrenia mediated by catecholamines. Am J Psychiatry 130: 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER (1965) Evoked potential correlates of uncertainty. Science 150:1187–1188

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tatetsu S (1963) Methamphetamine psychosis. Folia Psychiatr Neurol Japan Suppl 7:377–380

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iwanami, A., Suga, I., Kato, N. et al. Event-related potentials in methamphetamine psychosis during an auditory discrimination task. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 242, 203–208 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189964

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189964

Key words

Navigation