Journal of Statistical Physics

, Volume 82, Issue 1–2, pp 183–265 | Cite as

Polymer diffusion in quenched disorder: A renormalization group approach

  • Ute Ebert
Articles

Abstract

We study the diffusion of polymers through quenched short-range correlated random media by renormalization group (RG) methods, which allow us to derive universal predictions in the limit of long chains and weak disorder. We take local quenched random potentials with second momentv and the excluded-volume interactionu of the chain segments into account. We show that our model contains the relevant features of polymer diffusion in random media in the RG sense if we focus on the local entropic effects rather than on the topological constraints of a quenched random medium. The dynamic generating functional and the general structure of its perturbation expansion inu andv are derived. The distribution functions for the center-of-mass motion and the internal modes of one chain and for the correlation of the center of mass motions of two chains are calculated to one-loop order. The results allow for sufficient cross-checks to have trust in the one-loop renormalizability of the model. The general structure as well as the one-loop results of the integrated RG flow of the parameters are discussed. Universal results can be found for the effective static interactionw≔u−v≥0 and for small effective disorder coupling\(\bar v(l)\) on the intermediate length scalel. As a first physical prediction from our analysis, we determine the general nonlinear scaling form of the chain diffusion constant and evaluate it explicitly as
for\(\bar v(l) \ll 1\).

Key Words

Polymer dynamics polymer diffusion quenched random media renormalizability universality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. des Cloizeaux and G. Jannink,Les Polymeres en Solution (Les Ulis-France, 1987, in English: Clarendon Press, Oxford 1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U. Ebert and L. Schäfer,Makromol. Chem./Macromol. Symp. 81:31 (1994).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Schäfer, Private communication.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Oono,Adv. Chem. Phys. 61:301 (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Schaub, D. B. Creamer, and H. Johannesson,J. Phys. A 21:1431 (1988) and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Doi and S. F. Edwards,The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Baumgärtner and M. Muthukumar,J. Chem. Phys. 87:3082 (1987); M. Muthukumar and A. Baumgärtner,Macromolecules 22:1937, 1941 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Machta,Phys. Rev. A 40:1720 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. P. Lodge, N. A. Rotstein, and S. Prager,Adv. Chem. Phys. 79:1 (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. C. Martinez-Mekler and M. A. Moore,J. Phys. Lett. (Paris)42:L 413 (1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U. Ebert and L. Schäfer,Europhys. Lett. 21:741 (1993); L. Schäfer and U. Ebert,Makromol. Chem./Macromol. Symp. 81:17 (1994).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    U. Ebert, A. Baumgärtner, and L. Schäfer,Phys. Rev. E [to appear].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Duplantier,Phys. Rev. A 38:364 (1988).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. B. Harris,Z. Phys. B 49:347 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Bausch, H. K. Janssen, and H. Wagner,Z. Phys. B 24:113 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. K. Janssen,Kritische Dynamik, Lecture notes, University of Düsseldorf (1985).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.-G. de Gennes,Physics 3:37 (1967).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. J. Berne and R. Pecora,Dynamic Light Scattering (Wiley, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. A. Vladimirov, D. I. Kazakov, and O. V. Tarasov,Sov. Phys. JETP 50:521 (1979).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. G. Chetyrkin, S. G. Gorischny, S. A. Larin, and F. V. Tkachov,Phys. Lett. B 132:351 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Kleinert, J. Neu, V. Schulte-Frohlinde, K. G. Chetyrkin, and S. A. Larin,Phys. Lett. B 272:39 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Schloms and V. Dohm,Nucl. Phys. B 328:639 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Krüger and L. Schäfer,J. Phys. I. France 4:757 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Schäfer, U. Lehr, and Ch. Kapeller,J. Phys. I France 1:211 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Schäfer and C. Kappeler,J. Chem. Phys. 99:6135 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ute Ebert
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich PhysikUniversität EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations