Abstract
This papers applies a multiconstitutency approach to assessing organizational performance in Canadian general hospital psychiatric units and provincial psychiatric hospitals. In the absence of reliable and valid outcome measures, researchers and administrators have increasingly considered the views of external constituencies as a means of both defining the criteria for effective performance and actually assessing organizational performance. Key constituencies included psychiatric unit staff, psychiatric hospital administrators, and directors of community agencies providing mental health and related services. Opinions about organizational roles were found to exist among constituencies and among professional groups. Perceptions of organizational performance were highest for primary roles and substantially lowest for roles of secondary importance to the constituency. Future analyses of this type could help to validate the use of both constitutency measures and more traditional performance measures. While constitutency views may be seen as subjective, they are nevertheless key to building effective mental health service delivery systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akinbode, I., Adefolu, & Clark, R.C. “A framework for analyzing interorganizational relationships.”Human Relations 29:101–14, 1976.
Bachrach, L.L. “The effects of deinstitutionalization on general hospital psychiatry.”Hospital and Community Psychiatry 32 (11):786–790, November 1981.
Bryson, J.M.Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988.
Camberg, L.C., & McGuire, T.G. “Inpatient psychiatric units in nonteaching general hospitals: Response to public mental health policy or hospital economics?”Medical Care 27(2):130–137, 1989.
Connolly, T., Colon, E.J., & Deutsch, S.J. “Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach.”Academy of Management Review 5(2):211–217, 1980.
Donabedian, A.The Criteria and Standards of Quality. Ann Arbor. MI: Health Administration Press, 1982.
Fried, B.J., Finlayson, R., & Worthington, C. “The general hospital psychiatric unit/provincial psychiatric hospital interface: economic implications.” In E. Persad, S.S. Kazarian, & L.W. Joseph (eds.),The Mental Hospital in the 21 st Century. Toronto: Wall & Emerson, 1992.
Friedlander, F., & Pickle, H. “Components of effectiveness in small organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly 13:289–304, 1968.
Goldberg, R.J., & Fogel, B.S. “Integration of general hospital psychiatric services with freestanding psychiatric hospitals.”Hospital and Community Psychiatry 40(10):1057–1061, 1989.
Goldman, H.H., Pincus, H.A., Taube, C.A., et al. “Prospective payment for psychiatric hospitalization: questions and issues.”Hospital and Community Psychiatry 35:460–464, 1984.
Graham Report: Building Community Support for People: A Plan for Mental Health in Ontario. The Provincial Community Mental Health Committee. Toronto: Government of Ontario, 1988.
Hall, R.H., Clark, J.P., Giordano, P.C., Johnson, P.V., Van Roekel, M. “Patterns of interorganizational relationships.”Administrative Science Quarterly 22:457–74, 1977.
Hooyman, N.R., “A case study in interorganizational coordination.”Journal of Social Welfare 3:27–34, 1976.
Jobson, J.D. & Schneck, R. “Constitutent views of organizational effectiveness: Evidence from police organizations.”Academy of Management Journal 25(1):25–46, 1982.
Mechanic, D., & Davis, D. “Patterns of care in general hospitals for patients with psychiatric diagnoses: Some findings and some cautions.”Medical Care 28(12):1153–1164, 1990.
Ministry of Health, Government of Ontario.Putting People First: The Reform of Mental Health Services in Ontario. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1993.
Morrissey, J.P.; Hall, R.H., & Lindsey, M.L.,Interorganizational Relations: A Sourcebook of Measures for Mental Health Programs. National Institute of Mental Health, Series BN No. 2. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)82-1187. Washington, D.C.: Supt, of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1982.
Olfson, M. “The changing organization of inpatient psychiatric care in general hospitals.”Hospital and Community Psychiatry 41 (4):443–445, April 1990.
Richman, A., & Harris, P. “General hospital psychiatry: Are its roles and functins adjunctive or pivotal?”General Hospital Psychiatry 7:258–266, 1986.
Rogers, D.L., & Glick, E. “Planning for interagency cooperation in rural development.”Case Report US. Ames, IA: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, 1973.
Rogers, D.L., & Molnar, J. “Organizational antecedents of role conflict and ambiguity in top level administrators.”Administrative Science Quarterly 21:598–610, 1976.
Wright, K.N. “An exchange strategy for the interface of community-based corrections into the service system.”Human Relations 30:879–97, 1977.
Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, S.E. “A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness.”American Sociological Review 32:891–903, 1967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr. Pierre Leichner, formerly of the Douglas Hospital (Verdun, Que.) and now at Kingston Psychiatric Hospital; and Michel Perrault, Ph.D. of the Douglas Hospital collaborated in the translation and adaptation of the questionnaire for the Quebec setting. Their participation is gratefully acknowledged. Funded in part by grants from the Canadian National Health and Welfare Research and Development Program, and by the Ontario Mental Health Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fried, B.J., Worthington, C. The multiconstitutency approach to organizational performance assessment: A Canadian mental health system application. Community Ment Health J 31, 11–24 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02188977
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02188977