Skip to main content
Log in

Restricted recourse strategies for bounding the expected network recourse function

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents bounds for the expected recourse function for stochastic programs with network recourse. Cyclic recourse, a concept introduced by Wallace [18], allows the approximation of the recourse problem by restricting the optimal flows on a set of cycles and by augmenting the original network to induce separability. We introduce a new procedure that uses again a set of cycles but does not approximate the problem; instead it solves it heuristically without altering the original network or requiring separability. The method produces tighter bounds and is computationally feasible for large networks. Numerical experiments with selected networks illustrate the effectiveness of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Ben-Tal and E. Hochman, More bounds on the expectation of a convex function of a random variable, J. Applied Probability 9, 1972, 803–812.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.R. Birge and R.J-B Wets, Designing approximation schemes for stochastic optimization problems, in particular for stochastic programs with recourse, Mathematical Programming Study 27, 1986, 54–102.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.R. Birge and S.W. Wallace, Refining bounds for stochastic linear programs with linearly transformed independent random variables, Operations Research Letters 5, 1986, 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.R. Birge and S.W. Wallace, A separable piecewise linear upper bound for stochastic linear programs, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 26, 1988, 725–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L.F. Frantzeskakis and W. B. Powell, A successive linear approximation procedure for stochastic dynamic vehicle allocation problems, Transportation Science 24, 1990, 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L.F. Frantzeskakis and W. B. Powell, Bounding procedures for dynamic networks with random link capacities, with application to stochastic programming, submitted to Networks, 1989.

  7. K. Frauendorfer, Solving SLP recourse problems with arbitrary multivariate distributions — the dependent case, Mathematics of Operations Research 13, 1988, 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Gassmann and W.T. Ziemba, A tight upper bound for the expectation of a convex function of a multivariate random variable, Mathematical Programming Study 27, 1986, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.C. Huang, W.T. Ziemba and A. Ben-Tal, Bounds on the expectation of a convex function of a random variable: With applications to stochastic programming, Operations Research 25, 1977, 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W.C. Jordan and M. A. Turnquist, A stochastic, dynamic model for railroad car distribution, Transportation Science 17, 1983, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Kall and D. Stoyan, Solving stochastic programming problems with recourse including error bounds, Math. Operationsforsch. Statist., Ser. Optimization 13, 1982, 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Madansky, Bounds on the expectation of a convex function of a multivariate random variable, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30, 1959, 743–746.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.B. Powell, Y. Sheffi and S. Thiriez, The dynamic vehicle allocation problem with uncertain demands, inNinth International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, VNU Science Press, Utrecht, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W.B. Powell, A stochastic model of the dynamic vehicle allocation problem, Transportation Science 20, 1986, 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W.B. Powell, An operational planning model for the dynamic vehicle allocation problem with uncertain demands, Transportation Research 21B, 1987, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W.B. Powell, Y. Sheffi, K.S. Nickerson, K. Butterbaugh and S. Atherton, Maximizing profits for North American van lines' truckload division: A new framework for pricing and operations, Interfaces 18, 1988, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.T. Rockafellar,Network Flows and Monotropic Optimization, Wiley, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.W. Wallace, A piecewise linear upper bound on the network recourse function, Mathematical Programming 38, 1987, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frantzeskakis, L.F., Powell, W.B. Restricted recourse strategies for bounding the expected network recourse function. Ann Oper Res 64, 261–287 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187649

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187649

Keywords

Navigation