Skip to main content

The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providers

Abstract

A study of 449 cases administered by four major providers of ADR services showed that mediation was capable of settling 78 percent of cases, regardless of whether the parties had been sent to mediation by a court or had selected the process voluntarily. Mediation also cost far less than arbitration, took less time, and was judged a more satisfactory process than arbitration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Brett, J. M. 1986. Commentary on procedural justice papers.Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 1, edited by R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, and M. H. Bazerman. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M. and S. B. Goldberg. 1983. Grievance mediation in the coal industry: A field experiment.Industrial and Labor Relations Review 37: 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, T. and A. A. Vondra. 1994. Alternative dispute resolution: Why it doesn't work and why it does.Harvard Business Review (May–June): 120–130.

  • Goldberg, S. B. 1989. Grievance mediation: A successful alternative to labor arbitration.Negotiation Journal 5: 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. and T. R. Tyler. 1988.The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, C. 1992. Note on mediation research. InDispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation and other processes, 2nd ed., edited by S. B. Goldberg, F. E. A. Sander, and N. H. Rogers. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, F. E. A. and S. B. Goldberg. 1994. Fitting the forum to the fuss: A user-friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure.Negotiation Journal 10(1): 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. 1995. Law firm practices in ADR: 1994 survey findings. New York: Center for Public Resources Institute for Dispute Resolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scudder, E. 1995. Personal communication with Jeanne M. Brett.

  • Shapiro, D. and J. M. Brett. 1993. Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(6): 1167–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D., R. Drieghe, and J. M. Brett. 1985. Mediator behavior and the outcome of mediation.Journal of Social Issues 41(2): 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. and L. Walker. 1975.Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Jeanne M. Brett is the DeWitt W. Buchanan, Jr. Professor of Dispute Resolution and Organizations at the Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill. 60208

About this article

Cite this article

Brett, J.M., Barsness, Z.I. & Goldberg, S.B. The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providers. Negot J 12, 259–269 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187632

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187632