Negotiation Journal

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 259–269 | Cite as

The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providers

  • Jeanne M. Brett
  • Zoe I. Barsness
  • Stephen B. Goldberg
Research Report


A study of 449 cases administered by four major providers of ADR services showed that mediation was capable of settling 78 percent of cases, regardless of whether the parties had been sent to mediation by a court or had selected the process voluntarily. Mediation also cost far less than arbitration, took less time, and was judged a more satisfactory process than arbitration.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brett, J. M. 1986. Commentary on procedural justice papers.Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 1, edited by R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, and M. H. Bazerman. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brett, J. M. and S. B. Goldberg. 1983. Grievance mediation in the coal industry: A field experiment.Industrial and Labor Relations Review 37: 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carver, T. and A. A. Vondra. 1994. Alternative dispute resolution: Why it doesn't work and why it does.Harvard Business Review (May–June): 120–130.Google Scholar
  4. Goldberg, S. B. 1989. Grievance mediation: A successful alternative to labor arbitration.Negotiation Journal 5: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lind, E. A. and T. R. Tyler. 1988.The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McEwen, C. 1992. Note on mediation research. InDispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation and other processes, 2nd ed., edited by S. B. Goldberg, F. E. A. Sander, and N. H. Rogers. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  7. Sander, F. E. A. and S. B. Goldberg. 1994. Fitting the forum to the fuss: A user-friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure.Negotiation Journal 10(1): 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Scott, S. 1995. Law firm practices in ADR: 1994 survey findings. New York: Center for Public Resources Institute for Dispute Resolution.Google Scholar
  9. Scudder, E. 1995. Personal communication with Jeanne M. Brett.Google Scholar
  10. Shapiro, D. and J. M. Brett. 1993. Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(6): 1167–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shapiro, D., R. Drieghe, and J. M. Brett. 1985. Mediator behavior and the outcome of mediation.Journal of Social Issues 41(2): 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thibaut, J. and L. Walker. 1975.Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeanne M. Brett
  • Zoe I. Barsness
    • 1
  • Stephen B. Goldberg
    • 2
  1. 1.the Department of ManagementTexas A & M UniversityCollege Station
  2. 2.the Northwestern University School of LawChicago

Personalised recommendations