Skip to main content
Log in

Probability relations involving several subsystems

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

We consider the question of factorizability in tensor product spaces, and argue that the correlations associated with entangled states are even more problematic in the general case involving any tensor product of Hilbert spaces, than in the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen case with only two [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger consider the case of three subsystems inBell's Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, M. Kafatos, ed. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, ‘Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?’Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935). See also E. Schrödinger, ‘Discussion of probability relations between separated systems,’Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555–562 (1935); ‘Probability relations between separated systems,’Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 32, 446–452 (1936). D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1951), pp. 614–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932). See also S. Bergia, ‘Quantum mechanical correlations between subsystems as an aspect of tensor algebra,’Ann. Fond. Louis de Broglie 18, 53–79 (1993); A. Shimony. ‘Degree of entanglement,’ to appear inFundamental Problems in Quantum Theory, D. Greenberger, ed., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Bergia and F. Cannata, ‘Two-particle quantum mechanical correlations and local-realistic theories for non-binary observables,’ inBell's Theorem and the Foundations of Modern Physics, A. van der Merweet al., eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. H. Furry, ‘Note on the quantum-mechanical theory of measurement,’Phys. Rev. 49, 393–399 (1936); and ‘Remarks on measurement in quantum theory.’Phys. Rev. 49, 476 (1936). See also D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov, ‘Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Rosen and Podolsky.’Phys. Rev. 108, 1070–1076 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Capasso, D. Fortunato, F. Selleri, ‘Sensitive observables of quantum mechanics’,Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 7, 319–326 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Fortunato and F. Selleri, ‘Sensitive observables on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces,’Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 15, 333–338 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. S. Bell, ‘On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,’Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Afriat, A. Probability relations involving several subsystems. Found Phys Lett 8, 467–480 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186582

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186582

Key words

Navigation