Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Chapter 6 Multicriteria scheduling

  • Part II Multiple Category Resources
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. B. Benayoun, J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny and O. Larichėv, Linear programming with multiple objective functions: step method (STEM), Mathematical Programming 1(1971)366–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V.J. Bowman, Jr., On the relationship of the Chebyshev norm and the efficient frontier of multiple criteria objectives, in: Lecture Notes in Economics and Math. Systems, Vol. 130 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976)76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Emmons, A note on a scheduling problem with dual criteria, Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 22(1975)615–616.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.W. Evans, An overview of techniques for solving multi-objective mathematical programs, Management Sci. 30(1984)1268–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.M. Geoffrion, J.S. Dyer and A. Feinberg, An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department, Management Sci. 19(1972)357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Huckert, R. Rhode, O. Roglin and R. Weber, On the interactive solution to a multi-criteria scheduling problem, Zeitschrift für Operations Research 24(1980)47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C.L. Hwang and A.S.M. Masud,Multiple Objective Decision Making — Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.P. Ignizio,Goal Programming and Extension (Lexington Books, Massachusetts, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Iserman, The enumeration of the set of all efficient solutions for a linear multiple objective program, Operational Res. Quart. 28(1977)711–725.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Jacquet-Lagrèze, Concepts et modèles en analyse multicritère, Chap. 1 in: E. Jacquet-Lagrèze and J. Siskos (eds.), Méthode de décision multicritère (Editions Hommes et Techniques, Paris, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Jacquet-Lagrèze and J. Siskos, Assessing a set of additive ultility functions for multicriteria decision-making, European J. Opl. Res. 10(1982)151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Jacquet-Lagrèze, R. Meziani and R. Słowiński, MOLP with an interactive assessment of a piecewise — linear utility function, European J. Opl. Res. (to appear).

  13. R. Keeney and H. Raiffa,Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Nijkamp and J. Spronk, Interactive multiple goal programming — an evaluation and some results, in: G. Fandel and T. Gal (eds.),Multiple Criteria Decision Making — Theory and Applications (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.S. Panwalkar, R.A. Dudek and M.L. Smith, Sequencing research and the industrial scheduling problem, in: S.E. Elmaghraby (ed.),Symposium on the Theory of Scheduling and its Applications (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Roy,Méthodologie Multicritère d'Aide à la Décision (Economica, Paris, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Ruiz-Diaz and S. French, A survey on multi-objective combinatorial scheduling, in: S. French, R. Hartley, L.C. Thomas and D.J. White (eds.),Multi-Objective Decision Making (Academic Press, London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Słowiński, Allocation de ressources limitées parmi des tâches exécutées par un ensemble de machines indépendantes, in: M. Pelegrin and J. Delmas (eds.),Comparison of AC and OR Techniques Applied to Large Scale Systems Analysis and Control (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979)189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Słowiński, Multiobjective network scheduling with efficient use of renewable and non-renewable resources, European J. Opl. Res. 7(1981)265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Słowiński, Problèmes d'allocation de moyens limités en présence de critères multiples, Cahier du Lamsade, No. 36, Université de Paris Dauphine, Paris 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Słowiński, A new approach to multicriteria project scheduling under renewable and non-renewable resource constraints, in:Congrès Automatique 1983 — Productique et Robotique Intelligente (Editions Hommes et Techniques, Paris, 1983)63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Słowiński, Modelling of preferences in multicriteria decision problems (in Polish), ZN Pol. Sl⇂skiej 67(1983)95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Słowiński, Preemptive scheduling of independent jobs on parallel machines subject to financial constraints, European J. Opl. Res. 15(1984)366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Słowiński, Modelling and solving multicriteria project scheduling problems, in: A. Straszak (ed.),Large Scale Systems — Theory and Applications (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1983)483–488.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Słowiński, A review of multiobjective linear programming methods (in Polish), Przegl⇂d Statystyczny 31 (1984), Part I, 47–64, Part II, 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Słowiński and J. Warczyński, Application of the ellipsoid method in an interactive procedure for multicriteria linear programming, Zeitschrift für Operations Research 28(1984)89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Słowiński and J. Węglarz, An interactive algorithm for multiobjective precedence and resource constrained scheduling problems, in: V. Vriethoff, J. Visser and H.H. Boerma (eds.),Proc. 8th Internet Congress (Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985)866–873.

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Van de Panne,Linear Programming and Related Techniques, 2nd ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  29. L.N. Van Wassenhove and K.R. Baker, A bicriterion approach to time/cost trade-offs in sequencing, European J. Opl. Res. 11(1982)48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L.N. Van Wassenhove and L.F. Gelders, Solving a bicriterion scheduling problem, European J. Opl. Res. 4(1980)42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A.P. Wierzbicki, A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making, in: J.N. Morse (ed.),Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  32. P.L. Yu and M. Zeleny, Linear multiparametric programming by multicriteria simplex method, Management Sci. 23(1976)159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Zeleny, A concept of compromise solution and the method of the displaced ideal, Computers and Operations Res. 1(1974)479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. H.J. Zimmerman, Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(1978)45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Zionts, A survey of multiple criteria integer programming methods, Annals of Discrete Mathematics 5(1979)389–398.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. S. Zionts and J. Wallenius, An interactive programming for solving the multiple criteria problem, Management Sci. 22(1976)652–663.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapter 6 Multicriteria scheduling. Ann Oper Res 7, 177–196 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186438

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186438

Keywords

Search

Navigation