Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to criticisms of theB (3) field

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

The confusion and self-contradiction among recent critics of theB (3) (Evans-Vigier) field are analysed. Barron [17] and Buckingham [18] assert that the field is zero by symmetry. Grimes [21] asserts that the field isnon-zero butfortuitous. Lakhtakia in one paper [19] asserts thatB (3) isnon-zero butnot fundamental, and in a second paper that it isunknowlable and therefore may as well be zero. A rebuttal is given of each the individual papers, and it is shown that the Evans-Vigier field is the fundamental magnetizing field of electromagnetic radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. W. Evans,Physica B 182, 227, 237 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. W. Evans,Physica B 183, 103 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. W. Evans,Physica B 190, 310 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. W. Evans, in A. van der Merwe and A. Garuccio, eds.,Waves and Particles in Light and Matter (de Broglie centenial volume) (Plenum, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. W. Evans,The Photon's Magnetic Field (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. W. Evans, and S. Kielich, eds.,Modern Nonlinear Optics, Vols. 85(1), 85(2), 85(3) ofAdvances in Chemical Physics, I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice, eds. (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. W. Evans and J.-P. Vigier.The Enigmatic Photon, Volume One: The Field B (3) (Kluwer Academic, Dordrcht, 1994);The Enigmatic Photon, Volume Two: Non-Abelian Electrodynamics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995); M. W. Evans, J.-P. Vigier, S. Roy and S. Jeffers,The Enigmatic Photon, Volume Three: Theory and Practice ofB (3) (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996);Proceedings, The Present Status of the Quantum Theory of Light (a symposium in honor of Jean-Pierre Vigier), S. Jeffers, S. Roy and J.-P. Vigier, eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. Hasanein and M. W. Evans,The Photomagneton and Quantum Field Theory, part one ofQuantum Chemistry (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. W. Evans,Mod. Phys. Lett. 7, 1247 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. W. Evans,Found. Phys. Lett. 7, 67, 209 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. W. Evans,Found. Phys. Lett. 7, 379, 467, 577 (1994);Found. Phys. 24, 1519, 1671 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. W. Evans,Found. Phys. Lett. 8, 83, 187, 363, 385 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. c/o Prof. Stanley Jeffers, Department of Physics, York University, Toronto, Canada.

  14. S. Roy and M. Roy,Phys. Lett. A, in press.

  15. M. W. Evans, S. Jeffers and S. Roy,Il Nuovo Cim. D, in press.

  16. Including S. Jeffers and M. A. Novikov (experimentalists); M. W. Evans, S. Roy and J.-P. Vigier, theoreticians.

  17. L. D. Barron,Physica B 190, 307 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. D. Buckingham, Science,266, 665 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Lakhtakia,Physica B 191, 362 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Lakhtakia,Found. Phys. Lett.,8, 60 (1995); with reply by M. W. Evans,8, 63 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. H. Grimes,Physica B 191, 367 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.-P. Vigier, letter dated early 1993 from U.P.M.C., Paris.

  23. J. C. Huang, letter dated 1992 from Dept. of Physics, University of Missouri, Columbia. This describes Barron's argument as beingtotally wrong.

  24. J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. H. Ryder,Quantum Field Theory, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. D. Barron,Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. P. van der Ziel, P. S. Pershan, and L. D. Malmstrom,Phys. Rev. 143, 574 (1966); J. Deschamps, M. Fitaire, and M. Lagoutte,Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1330 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. L. de Broglie,Ondes Electromagnetiques et Photons (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Cornille, letter of Nov. 3rd, 1994, from Limeil, France.

  30. S. Kielich, in M. Davies (senior rep.),Dielectric and Related Molecular Processes, Vol. 1 (Chem. Soc., London, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Piekara and S. Kielich,Arch. Sci. 11, 304 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. S. Pershan,Phys. Rev. 130, 919 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. P. W. Atkins,Molecular Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Kielich,Molecular Nonlinear Optics (Nauka, Moscow, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Zawodny in Ref. 6, Vol. 85 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  36. W. K. H. Panofsky and M. Philips,Classical Electricty and Magnetism, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, M.W. Reply to criticisms of theB (3) field. Found Phys Lett 8, 563–573 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186247

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186247

Key words

Navigation