Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of the effects of natural and synthetic ligands on iron uptake by plants

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The uptake of iron by wheat seedlings was investigated using half-strength Hoagland's nutrient solution containing 2.0 μM ferric chloride labelled with59Fe. The iron content of root tissue, which includes adsorbed iron, was depressed by the presence in the solution of the synthetic ligands EDTA and polymaleic acid (PMA) and by the natural ligands, humate, fulvate and a water-extractable soil polycarboxylate. The patterns of change in iron content of the shoots were in all cases different from those of the roots and were of two types. EDTA and humate increased the iron content of the shoots to maximum values, at ligand concentrations of 5.0 μM and 2.5 mg l−1 respectively, and decreased it at higher concentrations. Fulvate, water-extractable soil polycarboxylate and PMA increased the iron content of the shoots up to the maximum ligand concentrations tested (25 mg l−1). These results are discussed in the light of the likely solution chemistry of iron and the various ligands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, H. A. and Russel, J. D. 1976 Possible relationship between soil fulvic acid and polymaleic acid. Nature, London260, 597.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barber, S. A., Elgawhary, S. M. and Malzer, G. L. 1972 Characterisation of nutrient supply mechanisms to plant roots using double labelling and the ratio of Ca/Sr absorbed, 11–20.In Proceedings of Symposium on the Use of Isotopes and Radiation in Research on Soil Plant Relationships. IAEA-FAO Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burk, D., Lineweaver, H. and Horner, C. K. 1932 Iron in relation to the stimulation of growth by humic acid. Soil Sci.33, 413–435.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaney, R. L., Brown J. C. and Tiffin, L. O. 1972 Obligatory reduction of ferric chelates in iron uptake by soybeans. Plant Physiol.50, 208–213.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DeKock, P. C. 1955 Influence of humic acids on plant growth. Science121, 473–474.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dormaar, J. F. 1975 Effects of humic substances from chernozemic Ah horizons on nutrient uptake byPhaseolus vulgaris andFestuca scabrella. Can. J. Soil Sci.55, 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giesy, J. P. 1976 Stimulation of growth inScenedesmus obliquus (Chlorophycea) by humic acids under iron limiting conditions. J. Phycol.12, 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glentworth, R. and Muir, J. W. 1963 The soils of the country round Aberdeen, Inverurie and Fraserburgh. Mem. Soil Surv. Gt. Br. (Scot). Edinburgh. H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hill-Cottingham, D. G. and Lloyd-Jones, C. P. 1965 The behaviour of iron chelating agents with plants. J. Exp. Bot.16, 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hodgson, J. F. 1969 Contribution of metal-organic complexing agents to the transporting of metals to roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.33, 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Linehan, D. J. 1977 A comparison of the polycarboxylic acids extracted by water from an agricultural top soil with those extracted by alkali. J. Soil Sci.28, 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Linehan, D. J. 1978 Humic acid and iron uptake by plants. Plant and Soil50, 663–670.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linehan, D. J. 1978 The uptake by plants of polymaleic acid: a polycarboxylic acid structurally related to those of soil. Plant and Soil50, 625–632.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norvell, W. A. 1972 Equilibria of metal chelates in soils p. 115–138.In Mortvedt, J. J., Giordano, G. M. and Lindsay, W. L. (eds) Micronutrients in Agriculture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oertili, J. J. and Opoku, A. A. 1974 Effect of macronutrient ions on the availability of iron from a chelated source. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.38, 597–602.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spiro, T. G., Allerton, S. E., Renner, J., Terzis, A., Bils, R. and Saltman, P. 1966 The hydrolytic polymerisation of Iron (III). J. Am. Chem. Soc.88, 2721–2726.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spiro, T. G. and Saltman, P. 1969 Polynuclear complexes of iron and their biological implications. Struct. Bonding Berlin6, 117–156.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stevenson, F. J. and Ardakani, M. S. 1972 Organic matter reactions involving micronutrients in soils p. 79–114.In Mortvedt, J. J., Giordano G. M. and Lindsay, W. L. (eds) Micronutrients in Agriculture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tiffin, L. O., Brown, J. C. and Krauss, R. W. 1960 Differential absorption of metal chelate components by plant roots. Plant Physiol.35, 362–367.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wallace, A., Mueller, T. and romney, E. M. 1976 Excess EDDHA in the nutrient solution on iron uptake by bush beans. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.7, 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linehan, D.J., Shepherd, H. A comparative study of the effects of natural and synthetic ligands on iron uptake by plants. Plant Soil 52, 281–289 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184566

Key Words

Navigation